Annapolis (Map, News) - People charged with a long list of crimes of violence, including breaking and entering a car, will have their DNA samples taken by authorities under legislation finally enacted by the Maryland House of Delegates and Senate on Monday.

Gov. Martin O’Malley called the legislation “our top public safety priority,” but the bill was significantly changed to quell the objections of the Legislative Black Caucus.

The bill had been debated in committees and on the floor of both chambers as civil libertarians and black lawmakers tried to kill the bill or heavily amend it.

“The legislative process is a process of consensus,” O’Malley said.

The governor was directly involved in the negotiations with lawmakers.

Under the amended bill, the DNA evidence will be automatically removed from the database if those charged are not convicted of the crime, and the law will sunset in five years, a requirement insisted on by House negotiators.

The genetic profiles collected also may not be used to identify a relative of the person charged in connection with another crime.

As introduced by O’Malley, the DNA samples would have been taken from all those arrested of the crimes.

The final Senate vote was 33-10, and some of the same objections to the bill were raised in debate.

“We’re taking DNA from people who are innocent,” said Sen. Alex Mooney, R-Frederick, who had concerns about security and privacy issues for the evidence.

“We have not looked at the uses DNA might have.”

Sen. Delores Kelley, D-Baltimore County, again complained that O’Malley had not funded the accreditation commission for the state forensic labs.

“We know we’ve had problems in the past based on poor lab work,” she said.

Sen. Lisa Gladden, D-Baltimore City and Judicial Proceeding Committee vice chairwoman who served on the conference committee but still voted against the measure, said, “It made a bad bill better and a bit more palatable.”

llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com

Comments from Examiner Readers

1:38 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008 re: "Md. House OKs DNA measure"

Examiner Reader said:
Even if one or two more crimes are solved due to this constitutional violation, which is highly doubtful, the end does not justify the means. Just curious to know why the black caucus was refered to as black crows by previous commentor. I could easily refer to the democrat caucus as democrat dummies, or republican caucus as the whiney republicans, or the women's caucus as worthless women. In this instance the black caucus was correct.

5 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:20 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008 re: "Black lawmakers don�t support expanding DNA collection bill"

Examiner Reader said:
5:05, The ability to use DNA to potentially free innocent people is precisely what the black caucus fought for. The initial bill did not provide for that. Sandy "scumbag" Rosenberg chaired an effort to prevent those types of amendments that could help exonerate the innocent. Had it not been for Jill Carter who pushed amendments for exoneration and expungment for the innocent, on behalf of the black caucus, they would have not been included in the bill. 995 of cold cases solved have been through DNA taken from convicted criminals, not an accused person that is presumed innocent. This bill is bad policy that will not reduce crime.

8 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

5:05 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 8, 2008 re: "Md. House OKs DNA measure"

EXAMINER READER said:
You know, DNA cuts both ways. DNA has also been the key to freeing innocent people who have served years for crimes they did not commit. I don't have a problem with my prints or DNA being on file, but I'm not planning on breaking into anyone's car today or taking someone's life. In principle, we should not have to have a national record of these things, but crime has reached epidemic proportions and our borders remain open to criminals of every kind. Extreme circumstances require extreme measures to achieve a solution. The Black Caucus (Black Crows) should focus on "in community" crime reduction measures. The majority of violent and property crimes are committed by blacks and against blacks. They should focus too on equality of sentencing guidelines where they'll find considerable support.

0 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:25 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008 re: "Senate OKs DNA plan, but black lawmakers split"

Reader said:
I protest DNA testing after todays news, darn canibals this state of MD we are in.

9 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

8:14 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008 re: "Black lawmakers don�t support expanding DNA collection bill"

Examiner Reader said:
Everyone that voted for this bill is guilty of a far worse crime than anyone they hope to target, and each legislator that voted "yes", as well as the governor should be forced to submit their DNA into CODIS and every other DNA database!

17 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

5:19 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008 re: "Senate OKs DNA plan, but black lawmakers split"

BLACKMAN said:
Here we go again lets see what we can do about crime lets put people Human Prints on file, lets keep an eye on them by placing people who are innicent first and worring about them fixing it later but in the mean time lets file them,and watch them, it's gonna be a train wreck, and it's gonna prove again that this state is a police state

11 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

6:25 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

Martin said:
Martinee, clue Please.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

6:14 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

Ernest P. McGee said:
I said it before and I'll say it again. The State Police ignored this problem for years. The Division of Parole and Probation has fixed this problem by collecting thousands of DNA samples over the past 12 months. Get a clue Martin! Thanks for the 2% raise!

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

5:33 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

Keep It Civil said:
It should not be inferred that O'Malley is like Hitler. Hitler had a higher approval rating.

12 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

4:34 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

Examiner Reader said:
The bill was introduced on behalf of O'Malley's administration. He will not be vetoing it. Although, to point out how hypocritical O'Malley is, the republican governor of South Carolina did veto this same legislation on the basis that is called for unconstitutional, privacy violations and would result in unreasonable searches. Why is O'Malley so-afraid to fight crime the legal and constitutional way? He should have learned after all those illegal arrests he caused in Baltimore, that cheating at the expense of the citizens doesn't work.

8 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

4:27 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

Examiner Reader said:
D, are you equating O'Malley with Hitler?

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

3:02 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

4 O'Malley said:
An oversight occurs on these DNA test all the time, and its all thrown out of court. Too much for some idiot judges with no power to understand? How many drugs will be found if they DNA test everyone. Call it what it is, a violation of your constitutional rights. Get over it. Take a chill pill.

10 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:02 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

D said:
Only O'Malley can no longer give support on DNA, a governor has the right to veto. Call it Hitler or the only arse of the State.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

12:31 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

Nicole said:
I agree, the DNA bill is a lousy bill. The General Assembly will pass this lousy bill for the lousy reason that lousy O'Malley has pressured them to pass it. There is ONE non-lousy member that fought against this bill and did not vote for this lousy bill. The only democrat in the MD General Assembly that does not take her marching orders from a rogue governor, or a run-away assembly. Thank you, my delegate, Delegate Jill P. Carter, Dist 41, for standing up for democracy, the constitution, your constituents, and for America. Delegate Carter was the ONLY "NO" vote on the House Judidicary Committee on this lousy DNA bill!

13 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

11:20 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "Black lawmakers don�t support expanding DNA collection bill"

Examiner Reader said:
The People's Republic of Maryalnd is at it again. This bill removes the presumption of innocense from everyone. If passed, you may as well collect DNA samples from every citizen, because there would be no distiction. This is a lousy bill, crafted and considered by a lousy general assembly.

8 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:41 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 15, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

Examiner Reader said:
No innocent person should be forced to give a DNA sample. Convicted criminals are a different story.

5 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:09 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 15, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

Examiner Reader said:
This DNA bill is bad. Black lawmakers are correct to oppose it. WHAT IS WRONG WITH WHITE LAWMAKERS THAT THEY WOULD BE FOR IT? O'Malley is a fascist and a hypocrite of the worst order. He got caught having thousands of innocent people locked up in Baltimore. And now, he wants to lock people up and take their DNA. Does anyone truly trust this guy's motives? Even Sheila Dixon is smarter on crime than O'Malley simply because she has focused on arresting people that are actually committing crimes. Bad bill. Bad governor.

9 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

8:52 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "O�Malley pushes for DNA expansion"

Examiner Reader said:
As long as it cost the taxpayers more money, Omalley supports it. It will give him another excuse to raise taxes again.

15 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

5:43 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "O�Malley pushes for DNA expansion"

avid reader said:
O'Malleys DNA will prove that he is a true Jerk.

23 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:46 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Some decry forced DNA tests in violent-crime arrests"

Duh. said:
Violent criminals should not have DNA put into a database, they should be executed and thrown into a pit.

19 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

12:35 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 12, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

Ernest P. McGee said:
The State Police ignored this problem for years. The Division of Parole and Probation has fixed this problem by collecting thousands of DNA samples over the past 12 months. Get a clue Martin!

19 agree | 24 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

4:23 AM MST on Fri., Jan. 11, 2008 re: "O�Malley calls for more DNA samples"

The Undertaker said:
O'Malley is a fascist who supports the IRA so it doesn't surprise me that he supports this.

29 agree | 19 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate