
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - San Francisco government could have a lot more eyes and ears on its business — in real time on the Internet.
The City provides live audio and video broadcast on its Web site for 14 boards, committees and commissions that hold public meetings at City Hall. Archives of the meetings — which include the Board of Supervisors and its six committees along with the Municipal Transportation Agency, which oversees Muni — are also provided on the site for up to one year.
But about 100 boards, committees and commmissions that meet at City Hall escape that kind of scrutiny, with public access limited to meeting minutes posted online or by requesting an audio cassette.
The Entertainment Commission, Department of Environment, Recreation and Park Commission, Animal Welfare and Control Commission and the Ethics Commission are among those that escape the live and archived broadcast.
Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi has introduced legislation that would require The City to stream live audio and video of public meetings at City Hall as well as establish an archive, with footage held for two years. The bill would require posting the meetings’ footage within 72 hours.
Mirkarimi said the law would enhance The City’s sunshine ordinance, which requires public access to certain city government information, and uses advancements in technology to move toward “complete transparency.”
The proposal is estimated to cost about $76,000 annually in labor costs, according to city officials. The City would also spend $55,000 from its Cable Franchise Capital Fund to purchase necessary equipment for startup.
Open-government advocate Kimo Crossman praised the proposed law, but advocated for same-day posting of the archived footage.
“The real value of the recording is to be able to read the story in the newspaper and then go listen to it,” Crossman said. “You really want to encourage same-day postage so people can listen to and participate in the government, because a few days later people forget about it and move on to different things.”
SFGTV Station Manager Jack Chin said that “No other city in the country provides this much meeting coverage.”
The Board of Supervisors Rules Committee voted Thursday to send the bill to the full board with recommendation for its approval. The full board is expected to vote on it on April 15.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
9:11 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Proposal for 'culture coupons' chided"
Report as inappropriate
12:50 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008
re: "Cola coup in process on the Peninsula"
Report as inappropriate
12:44 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008
re: "Cola coup in process on the Peninsula"
Report as inappropriate
1:36 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Smile, city government, you’re on webcast camera"
Report as inappropriate
7:46 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Smile, city government, you’re on webcast camera"
Report as inappropriate
3:57 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 11, 2008
re: "Outgoing supervisors vie for sway"
Report as inappropriate
3:46 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 9, 2008
re: "S.F. eateries may start counting calories"
Report as inappropriate
3:04 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 19, 2008
re: "Modicum of moderation on the way?"
Report as inappropriate
6:39 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 18, 2008
re: "Modicum of moderation on the way?"
Report as inappropriate
1:46 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 7, 2008
re: "S.F. eateries may start counting calories"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
""Supervisor Jake McGoldrick, the chair of the budget committee, was critical of the proposal. “There are much greater needs than culture coupons,” McGoldrick told The Examiner. “Young people who already exist here from babies on up to 18-year-olds are in dire need of help right now.” “They sound more like public-relations sizzle than actual substance,” he said. " There he goes again...is this guy for real?? Giving a kid an opportunity to take an art class certainly cannot hurt and likely would open some kids to a whole new way of seeing the world! Kids need to enjoy life and art is a beautiful way to regain self esteem and a sense wonder. Its hard enough to walk down the streets and not become a hard person in this City, so different then when I was a kid growing up here in the 50s and 60s.
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Obesity is a JUGE problem in our country. I am not sure the San Mateo County program will be particularly effective at reducing weight, but it is certainly worth a try: I know of no public campaigns that have been very effective. The campaign is aimed at creating AWARENESS of the harmful effects of sodas. It is the first step in getting people to limit their calorie intake.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Bay Area Taxpayer said:
The San Mateo County Stuper-visors should be ashamed of themselves and their $100,000 salaries and benefit packages for coming up with the idea ... geez. Why not use the money saved on this stupid campaign and use the money to finance Measure O the one that lost yesterday to clean up SM County Parks ... I guess this is just reason # 3,589 why SM county is in the red with a bunch of incompetant , mismanagers at the top. I wonder if they did a study to determine if they needed a study for an environmental report to decide if the cola study should include Pepsi or Coke vs. the store brands ? God almighty !!! What a waaste of time and money in San Amteo County.
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
$131k per year to implement...how about if the Supervisors kick in portions of their own salaries to cover the cost?
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Kimo Crossman said:
The ordinance only requires digital recording. SFGTV on it's own initiative is expanding that to audio webcasting in August 2008.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mayor Newsom is hardly a stranger to political power plays.
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
turtle head said:
How in the world would it help make people healthy? If you don't know deep fried food makes you fat, you are likely fat because you are too stupid too be able to read.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
King of the Dynasty said:
Chris Daly endorses David Chiu in D#3. Voters need to remember that connection when they vote. Do we want more of the same political dysfunction?
65 agree | 56 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
CRS said:
Sabatini states: "Moderates are looking to break the current progressive majority on the Board of Supervisors to give Mayor Gavin Newsom the four allies needed on the 11-member board to assure veto power on legislation." This is not particularly so. The mayor already has his veto power. Moderates are running with no reference to the mayor. They're running because they feel the need to bring some sanity and responsibility to the supes' side of the second floor, that's why. Andrew Ferguson
52 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Native San Franciscan said:
I sometimes wonder if Tom Ammiano isn't going to be happy until every restaurant in San Francisco is closed and either turned into a homeless shelter or crack house. So now were going to turn every restaurant menu into a document the size of the Tokyo phone book putting yet another cost on San Francisco restaurants in order to inform people of something they should take the individual responsibility to learn themselves. Why anybody whould want to own a restaurant in San Francisco with the current pinhead on the Board of Supervisors is beyone me.
90 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree