
We will consider publishing letters containing fewer than 150 words.
Submit your letter to the editor
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Re: “Metro operators told to get trains on track,” April 3
» Metro’s latest half-baked answer to the mechanical breakdowns, door jams and inadequate numbers of trains that keep it from running on schedule? Skip station stops! Skipping your stop to get you there on time is no way to run a railroad.
When will working commuters in this region rise up and get rid of the incompetents running Metro — and the boneheaded elected officials who appoint them?
» Lets see — Metro skips a stop, so I have to get off the train, wait for the next one (hope it comes quickly and I get my seat back) — now I’m late and Metro is on time. What a great solution to Metro’s on-time scheduling issues.
It’s so wonderful how they are making an effort to run their organization so efficiently. Not to mention the addition of the new cars that have the huge open space in the middle with nothing to hold on to. This way, they can cram a lot more people on the train and these people can just moosh together for stability — voila — tons of money saved, more riders, more money taken in.
Oh, and I can’t forget how concerned they are for our safety. When I see a couple of the big guys who monitor the stations, standing all together, joking and laughing and discussing the latest Redskins game, I am so relieved. I know that just their very presence will keep the bad guys from trying anything funny, so that’s one less worry for the day. Seems to me whoever is making these decisions deserves a big raise.
» The size of Metro’s mega fare increase may be indirectly putting pressure on the Metro board to improve service such as by expressing through stations on occasion to restore schedule adherence. But as rush hour backups have become commonplace. The board should be looking at running only eight-car trains during rush hour at six-minute headways instead of six-car trains at four-minute headways, so trains would be less likely to back up waiting for the trains ahead of them to leave the next station.
Ridership would not drop for a six-minute rush-hour headway, especially if it meant not sitting around because trains back up in the equivalent of a subway traffic jam. Although a few more switchyard staff would be needed to couple and uncouple train sets between eight-car to six-car before and after rush hour, fewer operators would be needed so Metro could on net save salary costs.
Tax-and-spend liberals
uncontrolled in Annapolis
In the special legislative session in 2007, the tax- and spend-happy liberal Democrats in Annapolis managed to push through the largest tax increases in the history of Maryland. Now in the 2008 session, the Democrats have found even more ways to take hard-earned money from the working families in Maryland.
If they are successful, the government will start taxing a multitude of services, including eye laser surgery, teeth whitening and several other similar services. Consumers in Maryland would be required to pay yet more for heating and cooling systems in their homes, for automobile tires and premiums on health insurance, all due to new taxes.
With fuel and gasoline prices on the continued rise, another increase in electric prices can be expected this summer, and, with the continued cost of consumer goods at an all-time high, working families need some tax relief and not more taxes.
Wheaton
Barack Obama says pledge just like the rest of us
Re: “Obama flaps could increase in weight in general election,” April 2
Bill Sammmon’s article about Republican strategies to attack Sen. [Barack] Obama in the fall quotes Republican strategist Jason Roe repeating the false Internet rumor that Obama “wouldn’t put his hand over his heart for the pledge of allegiance.”
If a falsehood is repeated without correction by the reporter, people might believe it.
The reporter should have corrected Mr. Roe. It has been well-documented that Obama says the pledge like anyone else, hand over heart. The Internet photo was taken during the national anthem and none of us were raised to put our hand over our heart for the anthem, although some choose to do so.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY
Comments from Examiner Readers
8:38 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "Letters: July 25, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:40 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: July 21, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:03 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: July 22, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
9:51 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: July 22, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
9:13 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008
re: "Letters: July 14, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:25 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 13, 2008
re: "Introducing the home-delivered Sunday Examiner newspaper"
Report as inappropriate
11:08 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 13, 2008
re: "Introducing the home-delivered Sunday Examiner newspaper"
Report as inappropriate
11:53 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 12, 2008
re: "Letters: July 10, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:26 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008
re: "Letters: July 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
3:18 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 10, 2008
re: "Letters: July 10, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
3:18 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: July 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:25 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: July 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:14 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: July 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:41 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: July 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
9:50 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: July 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:44 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008
re: "Letters: July 1, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:48 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 24, 2008
re: "Letters: June 24, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:37 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008
re: "Letters: June 18, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
1:48 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: May 30, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:33 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008
re: "Letters: June 6, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:11 PM MST on Tue., May. 27, 2008
re: "Letters: May 27, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:02 AM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: May 21, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
1:43 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: May 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:27 AM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: May 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
5:53 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Letters: May 6, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
6:28 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Letters: May 5, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:33 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "Letters: May 2, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:20 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: April 22, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:07 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: April 22, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
1:41 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 21, 2008
re: "Letters: April 21, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
6:54 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008
re: "Letters: April 17, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
1:05 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 15, 2008
re: "Letters: April 15, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:17 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Letters: April 10, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
8:15 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Letters: April 10, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
9:06 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008
re: "Letters: April 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:56 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: April 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:46 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: April 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
6:56 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 31, 2008
re: "Letters: March 31, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
4:50 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 24, 2008
re: "Letters: March 24, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:12 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 21, 2008
re: "Letters: March 21, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
5:58 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008
re: "Letters: March 18, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
5:54 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008
re: "Letters: March 18, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:34 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008
re: "Letters: March 13, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:53 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 17, 2008
re: "Letters: March 17, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
5:16 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 15, 2008
re: "Letters: March 13, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:07 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: March 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
9:43 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: March 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:07 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 5, 2008
re: "Letters: March 5, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:02 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "Letters: March 3, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:48 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Letters: February 28, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
Nick Beddoes said:
Why didn't the Examiner report on Robert Novak's recent hit-and-run incident in D.C.? And why didn't the police cite him for leaving the scene of an accident? Is he too sacred a conservative icon to be held accountable for his actions?
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Angela McIntosh is confused about many things.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Angela, when does life begin? From the moment of conception? What happens if the fertilized egg deosn't implant itself in the womb? What if some other miscarriage occurs? How far do we want to go with this line of thinking?
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Erica Backus said:
Angela McIntosh seems confused about what the word "person" means. The US 14th Amendment defines person as someone born or naturalized in the US. The Bible assigns personhood at birth, and modern science shows that what makes us persons occurs late in gestation, in the third trimester. Francois Quinson is out of line in calling pro-choice people "fanatics". We who are pro-choice hold that each and every woman should be free to follow her own conscience in cases of problem pregnancies. Those who oppose freedom of conscience and who would impose their theology on everyone are the real fanatics.
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Julia Banscoft said:
As the parent of a daughter and a granddaughter, I resent Richard Retta's presumptuous assertions about reproductive choice (7/15 letter). According to him a fetus has the same rights as a woman. That is equivalent to saying that an egg is a chicken or that an acorn is an oak tree. If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament. He should know a little more about science and the Bible before he spouts nonsense.
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Where is "Find a news rack icon" on your website? Need locations for 21050 zip.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Received the new Examiner this morning, and, after looking at the revised design, I'd like to say, "BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!" Man, this paper stinks.
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Erica Backus said:
G. Kaukaulas (July 10 letter) claims that abortion breaches divine law. He may believe that, but nowhere does the Bible say so. Genesis 2:7 says: "Then the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul". That means that something becomes a human person AT BIRTH. Exodus 21:22-25 shows that the life of a fetus is much inferior to that of a woman. Male dominated legislators should just butt out of women's decisions of conscience. And Nancy Wells' letter (same day) diaplays a similar ignorance of the Bible. She has no right to dictate what other women should decide under their particukar circumstances.
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Kendall Stevenson said:
Quin Hillyer is right that this election will determine the makeup of the Supreme Court. As Justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts have already done considerable damage to our basic liberties, I'm sure I'm not alone in hoping that a President Obama will appoint justices who will uphold church-state separation, civil liberties abd civil rights.
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Lakeforest Apt Resident said:
Why is Brad Botwin once again attributing violent criminal behavior to immigration status. The tragedy at Lakeforest Mall was the result of a robber who became a murderer. If convicted, he should be treated like any other 2nd-degree murderer. His immigration status is far less important to me. Would Mr. Botwin has been less offended if the murderer were a legal immigrant, or a native-born citizen, with gang ties? Would he feel less sympathy for the waiter victim, if he were an illegal immigrant?
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I wonder if any of Mr. Tunes clients have read his letter? If so, they should take another look at their last tax return!!
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Libe said:
The Examiner Reader defending the South Dakota law designed in inhibit free choice on abortion obviously knows little about neurobiology, law, or the Bible. As neurobiology shows, the most important component of human personhood is consciousness, and brain development does not allow that until some time after 28-32 weeks. As for the Judeo-Christian scriptures, they use the word "nefesh" for person and that refers to something that breathes, in other words, that is born. South Dakota's law is simply another attempt to gum up a woman's constitutional right to follow her own conscience.
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Libe said:
Lawrence Marsh (letter, July 8) is wrong in assuming that the US Constitution's religious freedom guarantees give government (i.e., the US Navy) authority to impose one-size-fits-all religious devotions on military cadets. In doing so the Naval Academy is running afoul of the First Amendment's establishment clause. Flaunting the Constitution is not showing a good example to future officers. The Navy should cease and desist.
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's wrong to describe South Dakota's law as anti-choice. It merely assures that women follow informed consent and that they know all aspects of what they choose to do. Mr. Doerr's definitions of "personhood" are nothing short of bizarre, as are his references to various Constitutional amendments. Liberals apparently believe that nothing exists until at least 28 weeks of gestation. In the vast majority of cases, once conceived, a human baby, if not aborted, develops systematically. It is folly to argue that until a baby can survive outside the womb, "personhood" does not exist. What are liberals afraid of, that if women understand all aspects of what they are considering, they will choose not to have abortions, and that industry will die?
3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Libe said:
Two letters on July 3 seeking to discredit evolution missed their target completely. So-called "Intelligent Design" creationism has no cradibility whatever in the science community and was found by a federal court in Pennsylvania to be thinly disguised religion and therefore unconstitutional in public schools. As for so-called "missing links", that term was obsolete generations ago as Mendelian genetics and now molecular biology have filled in the gaps that Darwin missed 150 years ago. Natural selection evolution is the only scientific explanation for the diversity of life still standing.
8 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
William Burt's argument against windmills raised some interesting points. "It would be shameful to destroy part of our 200-year heritage for the sake of building another symbol of our overconsumption" How about a trade? We close down some coal-fired power plants, reforest them and reclaim them as parks (like Theodore Roosevelt National Park), then build some wind turbines to replace the lost energy generation?
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Re. Letters June 24/08. Obama wants to be President so bad that he has accepted illegal money from the Chinese, which explains the current flood of Chinese and Far East immigrants in the U.S., taking American jobs, ruining our economy, and don't be surprised if they already vote!
3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
to 12:11, how come your not gripping about the taxpayer bailouts for wallstreet and the huge amounts of money being stolen daily in the wars. crawl into your hole and the hell with your fellow man.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: Standing up against the rhetoric Good for Fields! Glad to see there are young people in Chevy Chase of all places who don't pick up pom-poms for a candidate just because of being a "D" or "R" without really investigating where they come from and what they stand for. Kudos to you Mr. Fields!
7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Comrade David Edwards has decided that there should be a limit on the number of SUVS allowed per household. Should we expect searches of homes for illegal SUVs (exceeding the proper quota) and what should be the punishment for transgressors?
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
D.C. needs to "fully fund year-round pre-K and kindergarten, after-school and full-time summer programs..." Classic liberal cradle-to-grave coverage. Let's add fulltime nannies, free babysitting, and whatever else taxpayers can fund to take responsibility off the "parents" who create the children.
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hats off to Mrs. Peterson for telling the truth because these people are devious, will lie to get what they want and are operating from the "dark side". Our children have nothing to do with their nebulous agenda. This is most unfortunate. The author will certainly be supported by thousands of teachers! Please carry on!
5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How anyone could conclude allowing illegal immigrants to help US companies meet their labor needs is a "high-minded and noble" effort in the face out an out of control situation is delusional and part of the problem.
10 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Matt Nerzig, Spokesman SEIU Local 32BJ said:
Thanks Jerome for your letter. Never mind my so-called "illusions," we can discuss that off-line. More importantkly, anyone who feels our immigration system is not broken is suffering from delusions. Denying this universally-accepted view, and its impact on our struggling economy, flies in the face of reality. Sticking our heads in the sand rather facing up to the problems this immigration crisis creates for our economy get us no closer to a solution. If its "high-minded and noble" to help US companies meet their demands for labor that at the same time safeguards the men and women willing to work these jobs, I'll take that (union) label.
7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The point people miss the most is that Reverand Wright calls himself a preacher of Gods word, Is this the sort of surmon that you want your pastor discussing. Obama called him a friend, mentor, "Spiritual Advisor" and my pastor. Suppose Obama did not personally attend a surmon while this sort of preaching took place. As publically well know Wright appears to have been in the Chicago area it's hard to believe any member of his church with such a close relationship to his pastor would not have at a minimum been aware of his ranting. Somethings in life you have no choice but the church you attend does not fall into that catagory. By tolerating these views it demonstrates the poor judgement and character Obama owns.
7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Don’t judge Obama by Rev. Wright’s words - No I won't judge Obama by Mr. Wright's words. I judge Obama by his judgement to stick to his pastor for such a long time. Why did Obama associate himself with Jeremiah Wright? By associating himself with Wright Obama did damage. If my pastor said something like that, I would walk away. All he had to do was walk away but nooooo... Obama was clapping and dancing inside the church! So I don’t judge Obama by Rev. Wright’s words, I judge Obama by his own conduct and that is sticking by his man.
7 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
From someone who shot someone with their sons gun...check your facts Carl.Good thing he was FBI.
10 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's around 22 million not billion.
17 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The USA uses 22 Billion barrels of oil a day, The Alaskan oil reserve would last 1/2 of a day.
13 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re "Obama’s remark was more nuanced than skin color", 21 April - Wow, what an angry writer. Here's a news flash - There is no such thing as "a typical WASP".
13 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jason Durda said:
This is a great piece. I agree wholeheartedly. Amit Singh is really a fresh face into the Republican Party of Northern Virginia.
15 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr said:
What Mandy Stoltzfus and others seems to overlook is that people in small town America who have seen their jobs evaporate or get shipped overseas have good reason to be bitter, especially when their national government does little or nothing to help them. Sen. Obama has admitted that his choice of words might not have been the best, but he was right in pointing to the bitterness of those whose very survival is in jeopardy.
15 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Prince William absolutely did the right thing. Illegal aliens are a social and economic drain on America and they must be encouraged to leave and go back to their home countries. If they want to come back legally, then great, we will welocme you back! But our society simply cannot abide the MILLIONS of people coming here un-checked and then violating our laws and cultural norms. That is not how American society is run, and our labor and uimmigration laws are designed to protect Americans from this unjust, and inhumane foreign invasion. HELP SAVE MARYLAND everybody!
16 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Paul said:
Mr. Botwin is absolutely correct when he says that Prince William citizens will be better off in the long run should all the illegal aliens leave. The people who profit from illegal aliens -- greedy businesses, corrupt real estate developers and poverty pimps like NCIC -- are picking the pockets of ordinary tax-payers. Illegal immigration has facilitated the greatest wealth-redistribution event in US history, enriching the upper class at the expense of lower and middle class workers.
16 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr said:
Re my April 7 "Six years of war in Iraq must end" letter, I wrote that the war has injured 30,000 young American service members. Former Sen. John Edwards, however, has noted that the actual figure is 60,645 and rising. Further, I left out the large number of returned Iraq veterans who are jobless, homeless, and not getting adequate medical care. Let's "support our troops" by giving them a new G.I. Bill and adequate health care and by bringing them home.
13 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: "Tax credit won't cover steep rise in prices" We don't just need another Boston Tea Party. We need a general revolution. Won't happen, though. Voters are so lazy or self-centered, they keep putting the same losers/crooks back in office.
12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: six years of war in Iraq must end The comparisons are totally skewed. And please, stop parroting Obama's total lie about the "100 years". Enough already.
11 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Metro system (while maintenance was done and no eating was still enforced) was good by U.S. standards. The fact is that all U.S. transportation systems are pathetic compared with those in other parts of the world.One small example - a high speed train from DC to Boston would relieve much air congestion. Why are so many way ahead of us?
12 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Robin Ficker Broker Robin Realty said:
I said in the 2008 campaign for County Executive that, "A Vote for Ike Leggett is a Vote to Raise Your Own Taxes." How true! Now he is giving us the largest property tax increase in 20 years and he will not commit to sticking to the charter property tax limit in the two years after this one either.
12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re term limits Unfortunately, terms limits may be necessary, because our politicians have subverted our constitutional system to their own benefit and greed.
14 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re hypocritical Edwards letter, 18 March Whom a politician endorses has nothing to do with past statements and everything to do with self-serving interests. If H.Clinton offers Edwards the attorney generalship,he'll be with her. Edwards a hypocrite? What a shock!
13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: "Only states are entitled to an armed militia" This is a complete misreading of the 2d amendment. The right to bear arms has nothing to do with living in a state, and the 2d amendment says nothing like "only states are entitled to an armed militia".
13 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Home prices rose ridiclously in Prince William and were dropping long before the Resolution was first enforced on Mar 3, 2008. So to think that the Illegal Resolution was the catalyst is patently absurd and downright apologistic. Chris Cummings
11 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: no immunity for snooping telecoms The boogy man is not coming to get anyone, unless you have a connection to a jihadist. If we don't get the information and warnings we need to stay ahead of these people, there will be no remaining years to live out.
13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I saw abandoned houses in Prince William County trading at 50 cents on the dollar, while surrounding jurisdictions — which are not driving out immigrants — were selling in the range of 25 to 30 percent off peak price. Nobody is "driving out immigrants". There's one word missing in your remark.. It's always left out in the lefty argument. The word.....come on, you know it.....that's right....ILLEGAL. Illegal Immigrants.
13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Using Change from Welfare Tax Dollars said:
"I find it incomprehensible why my tax dollars should help someone who has the money to buy drugs."... If a welfare recipient uses tax dollars to buy food, shelter and medicine, what do they do with the "change"? In other words, tax dollars can be used to handle basic needs, but we cannot reasonably expect those same welfare recipients to not buy a one-dollar lottery ticket, candy bar, or beer bottle. Our focus should be on ensuring the poor's basic needs, not scolding them for occassionally indulging themselves with pocket change. If drug treatment is needed, then help them fight it. Maybe they'll switch to a less expensive habit, like alcohol and other junk food.
11 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: "no more taxes to fix county's shortfall" - The fault lies with voters, who keep electing these spendthrifts. The way to say “no” is to boot them out of office.
11 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Isn't it ironic, the New York Times, which seeks to coddle illegal immigrants, finds something wrong with McCain's legal status. Oh, and by the way, NYT endorsed McCain! The true test of whether a newspaper means it about papers not being important is to try to get into their office building without identification. Good luck.
11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re:"Required drug tests would undermine welfare program" I am very willing to help someone with food and shelter. I find it incomprehensible why my tax dollars should help someone who has the money to buy drugs.
29 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Trying to accomplish something, is better than not trying at all.
42 agree | 54 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree