Examiner.com // 9 mins ago
Examiner.com // 23 mins ago
KTLA.com // 28 mins ago
KTLA.com // 31 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 2 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 23 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 23 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 30 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 56 mins ago
Examiner.com // 3 hrs ago
 
   
Taxi drivers protest exclusive contracts
Article History
There are updates to this article.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Being a cab driver in Baltimore is far from easy, says taxi driver Hassan Bouh.

Sky-rocketing gas prices, bumpy city streets, and the threat of robbery always lurking around the next corner all make driving a cab a tough job.

“You never know who you are going to pick up,” he said.

But Bouh said Yellow Cab’s recently inked exclusive agreement with the Renaissance Hotel at the Inner Harbor — one of 26 such deals across the city — is making driving a taxi for a living in Baltimore an even more difficult proposition.

“They’re killing us,” said Bouh, standing on the sidewalk outside Penn Station during an impromptu protest organized by cab drivers Thursday afternoon.

“They have a monopoly on the business, and it’s not fair,” Hassan said.

Joined by roughly 50 other taxi drivers, Hassan was one of many who said Yellow Cab’s tightening grip on the city’s prime tourist spots including Baltimore’s Penn Station, roughly a dozen prime hotels and several major hospitals, has made earning a living increasingly difficult.

“We all pay the same fees and have the same license, but we can’t pick up passengers at the train station,” said Florain Folawiya, another driver for Diamond Cab who joined the protest.

But officials for Yellow Cab said exclusive contracts are awarded based on the quality of service.

“We have high standards for our drivers, and our customers want us to be accountable to them,” said Mark Joseph, president of Yellow Transportation, which manages Yellow Cab.

Some drivers blamed the Public Service Commission, which regulates cab drivers.

“We all have a public service badge,” said Toya Fogg, another Diamond driver.

“So we should all have the same opportunity. They need to do more to make it fair.”

Calls to the Public Service Commission were not returned by press time.

sjanis@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:10 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 2, 2008 re: "Taxi meter enforcement under way in the District"

Examiner Reader said:
"Metered cab fares start at $3, plus a $1 gas surcharge, and increase 25 cents for each one-sixth of a mile traveled, or for every minute stopped in traffic or moving under 10 mph." That is a $4 drop charge. Seems like it is way too much. Lower it.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:55 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "Few D.C. cabs ready as meter deadline looms"

Karl Rudder said:
On November 6, 1931 the DC Public Utilities Commission issued order no. 956 and listed 20 reasons to, "deny any version of the zone system to replace meters in DC taxicabs." (Free copy of PUC order no. 956 available by calling the Public Service Commission) Congress passed insulting legislation that forced the use of the zone system ("The Taxicab Rider" Wash. Post editorial 11/13/71) regardless of the fact that Judge Adkins completely upheld PUC order no. 956 (PUR 1932C pg 1) and the Appeals Court upheld Judge Adkins decision. The DC City Council has wasted hundreds of millions of dollars in maintaining the DC Taxicab Commission since 1987 just as Congress had created the DCTC and now the installation of meters in DC cabs is being persistently presented as merely an element of liking of Mayor Fenty. I have testified before the DC City Council since 1975 to make issue of the still standing court decisions to expose the fact that the DC taxicab zone system had not ever been approved!

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:57 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Few D.C. cabs ready as meter deadline looms"

Karl Rudder said:
My address to the unique DC Taxicab Zone System has always been based on the basic, undeniable yet little known facts. Fact 1 - Meters were the original means that were used to compute taxicab fares in the District of Columbia. Fact 2 - The "zone system" was denied by the DC Public Utilities Commission for 20 reasons when they issued PUC order no. 956 on 11/6/31. (Free copy of PUC order no. 956 is available by calling the DC Public Service Commission) Fact 3 - The decision by the DC Public Utilities Commission was completely upheld by Judge Adkins (1932 PUR volC page 1) and Judge Adkins decision was upheld by the DC Appeals Court. (1932 75 F2d 1005) Fact 4 - The District of Columbia is the only major city in this country that does not use a meter to equitably compute taxicab fares as well as serve as a reliable means to record the income and compute the taxes due from local taxicab companies and drivers. Fact 5 - Reason no. 9 on PUC order no. 956 stated: "That proper account

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:02 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Judge backs taxis’ switch to meters"

Examiner Reader said:
As a D.C. resident who is excited to be able to economically ride taxis again, I say "hallelujah." The taxi industry's attempts to convince people that time-and-distance meters will result in higher prices are laughable.

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:53 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 8, 2008 re: "Group: More cabbie strikes ahead"

Billy Ray Edwards said:
I know why you censored my comment on the DC taxicab issue,all one has to do is check Mayor Fenty,Campain finance you will find out the Mayor took money from VA and MD taxicab CO.

79 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:59 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 5, 2008 re: "Group: More cabbie strikes ahead"

hurricanewarningdc said:
I feel no sympathy for the cab drivers. None at all. The problem isn't that they'll make less money on the meter system than the zone system. Rather, the problem is that since most cabbies are crooks (in my experience and the experience of every person I know who lives in or visits DC), the meter system will reduce the extra money that they were pocketing illegally. They'll likely make more money with more rides via meter... but if you tack on what they were getting for the false charges for extra zones, baggage fees, etc, some will definitely lose out. As a consumer, all I can say is "bravo."

65 agree | 80 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Fenty announces cuts to cab fares"

Steve said:
Thank you, Mayor, not only for the meters but making sure that they are reasonable. How DC cabs think they deserve higher than New York ones is beyond me. And do they really think the strike will cripple the city? Guess what. We consumers can strike, too. No tips until this is resolved.

111 agree | 97 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:44 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "D.C. cabdrivers want residency exemption extended further"

Billy Ray Edwards said:
It should not be a decission of the mayor on meters in this unique histrocal taxicabs system in DC and the residents should have right to make this decission though referedum with the vote.

136 agree | 153 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:34 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 28, 2007 re: "New maps for cabs but eye is on meters"

recyclist said:
Let's switch to meters already!!! It's simply ridiculous that we are still clinging to this unfair and arbitrary zone system. And while we're at it, let's get rid of the fuel surcharge and replace it with a per-mile or per-minute fuel rate increase. Why should a person taking a 1-mile trip pay the same fuel surcharge as someone traveling from NW to SE? Let the users pay the actual costs of their cab rides.

219 agree | 211 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)