Jury acquits corrections officers accused of beating inmate
Article History
There are updates to this article.

Anne Arundel County (Map, News) - An Anne Arundel jury deliberated late into Tuesday evening and acquitted five corrections officers charged with second-degree assault against an inmate at the former Maryland House of Correction, according to the State’s Attorney’s Office.

The officers had been accused of using excessive force against inmate Bradford Matthews who was resistant during a strip search at the prison chapel in July 2006.

But the officers maintained throughout the weeklong trial that they used necessary force to control Matthews who refused to leave his cell, swung and kicked at officers and reached into his pants for something.

Matthews was one of about 50 inmates who were searched and transported from the Jessup facility the day after Corrections Officer David McGuinn was fatally stabbed on July 25, 2006.

The prosecutor alleged the officers— Manuel Williams, Naron Dyer, Antoine Fordham, Berkley Ghee and Keith Randolph— beat Matthews when he refused to give them a wristband that he was wearing.

Assistant State's Attorney Anne Colt Leitess pointed to photographs of Matthews’ bruised and swollen face during closing arguments Tuesday, saying the officers caused “profound hearing loss” when they stomped and kicked him.

“Their story doesn’t even come close to justifying Mr. Matthews’ beating or explaining the injuries,” she said.

“Their brother officer had just been stabbed and they were venting. Matthews was a convenient target and this was their way of releasing a little anger.”

Defense attorneys said the officers were not friends with McGuinn and there was no medical evidence to support that Matthews was stomped or kicked.

Leitess also alleged Officer Fordham planted a homemade knife on Matthews and claimed it was hidden inside the wristband to justify the beating. She said Matthews could not have had the knife because it was found the day before near the location where McGuinn was killed.

But defense attorneys said three knives were found that day, and a captain admitted he mixed them up in his pocket and was unable to identify which one was allegedly taken from Matthews.

“The entire theory of the state is a red herring because nobody is using the knife as a reason to take him down,” said defense attorney Paul Kramer in closing arguments.

“What the state is trying to do is fit a square peg in a round hole and it isn’t going to fit.”

The defense also attacked Matthews’ credibility, saying he’s an armed robber who admitted to making knives and fighting in prison.

cpeirce@baltimoreexaminer.com

People who read this also read:

Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

4:23 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Jury acquits five officers accused of beating inmate"

Re Ms. Nakia said:
Nakia, does the name Brian Nichols mean anything to you? Look into the ATL Courthouse murders and see what happens when prisoners aren't supervised properly, smuggle homemade weapons in their clothing or shoes, and overpower their corrections officers. What a debacle! We must stop just warehousing people who are incarcerated while we protect their lives and rights along with the corrections officers who work with them. Prisoners must focus on getting fit for life with a HIGH SCHOOL eq. DIPLOMA AND A JOB SKILL. We NEED them to have these things before they return to society and they owe it to us to return ready to live a productive life.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

9:40 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Jury acquits five officers accused of beating inmate"

Examiner Reader said:
Will this excessive constant abuse never stop? A man in a cage requires 5 people to take him down? I don't trust Corrections Officers who leave out the knife in their jusitification for the assault. Let inmates do their time without beating them.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:07 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Jury acquits five officers accused of beating inmate"

Examiner Reader said:
wow ...I would like to say that I am surprised by these posts but once again you have proven that you do not get it. Everyone who works in and is housed in our facilities has the right to be there safely. How we treat people behind the walls determines how they come home when they are released (and make no mistake 95% are coming home) and when they come home after a shift. This is not about being soft on crime or being felon friendly. It is about how we must be smarter in how we do corrections. It is about how we protect everyone involved in the system so that they can do their jobs and their time so when they return to OUR communities, we are safer and smarter. Wake up folks, 95% of our prison is coming back and they are bearing the scars and impact of what we are doing behind the walls. It is time for the light to come on and for Maryland to do things smarter and more effectively or we will all pay the price.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:14 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Jury acquits corrections officers accused of beating inmate"

Examiner Reader said:
City Resident: once again you are worng the animals are the ones in jail.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:49 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Jury acquits corrections officers accused of beating inmate"

Examiner Reader said:
Nakia, put a handle on this jury. no, Judge, jury is too beyond stomping out fool officers for beating an inmate. I think that has been proven, again and again.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:28 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Jury acquits corrections officers accused of beating inmate"

Examiner Reader said:
Nakia, "you can't handle the truth"

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:53 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Officers say inmate lied about use of excessive force"

City Resident said:
you people are animals!!!

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:48 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Jury acquits corrections officers accused of beating inmate"

Examiner Reader said:
It should have been a code dead, Nakia you racist beeoch. You watch to many movies, come back to reality. I was in the Marines for 12 years and never heard of a code red until that stupid movie came out. BOO HOO a criminal got stomped, we need more stompings, maybe it will deter people from doing crimes. EYE FOR AN EYE TOOTH FOR A TOOTH. People that go to jail should have to forefit all rights under the constitution.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:39 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Jury acquits corrections officers accused of beating inmate"

Examiner Reader said:
Convicts should be beat on a regular basis they are not on vacation you know

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:15 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Jury deliberates in case of corrections officers accused of beating inmate"

Ms. Nakia Barksdale said:
Who authorized this beating. It would appear that a code red was called. Next they will say there is no such thing as a code red. I recently saw a documentary about Col Nathan Jessup. I don't know what it was called but Tom Cruise played a lawyer. Col Jessup was taken down after ordering a code red. A fish rots from the head on down, so its time to take a good look at the Warden and this culture of state sanctioned genocide.

1 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:58 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008 re: "Officers say inmate lied about use of excessive force"

Examiner Reader said:
Nice speech. They allegedly beat and stomped an inmate in custody. That's not what the inmate was sent to prison for.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:35 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008 re: "Officers say inmate lied about use of excessive force"

Examiner Reader- Just the Truth said:
Time to support police officers who must protect themselves under these circumstances. There will always need to be oversight to do everything possible to eliminate abuse of power and excessive force by police officers, but we can't ignore that the officer's life is on the line too when arresting armed, and some drug addicted suspects who see that officer as the only thing standing between themselves and freedom.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)