
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Although smoking in bars was banned by the state in 1998, some drinking establishments, including a handful in San Francisco, have escaped the prohibition by taking advantage of a labor code loophole that one city supervisor said he hopes to close.
The state labor code prohibits exposing employees’ to secondhand smoke. However, if a bar is owner-operated, does not have other employees and has successfully applied with the Department of Public Health to allow smoking, it is legal, according to the City Attorney’s Office.
City health department officials could not immediately provide the number of bars permitted to allow smoking in San Francisco, but spokeswoman Eileen Shields said it was only “a few.”
One of the exempted bars is Whiskey Thieves, located on Geary Street, near Hyde Street, confirmed co-owner Noelle Cahill.
“It’s a haven for people who smoke and they make their choice to come here,” Cahill said.
Alexandra Hernandez, co-chair of the San Francisco Tobacco Free Coalition, said the bars were getting an undue break from the law.
“Bars are public places and should be smoke-free just like all other businesses,” Hernandez said.
San Francisco’s bar smoking days could be numbered. Supervisor Chris Daly is expected to introduce legislation today that would prohibit smoking in all bars, regardless of whether they are owner-operated.
The bill also includes a number of other tougher restrictions on smoking, including a ban of smoking at farmers markets, in ticket lines for events or ATMs, and 20 feet from private buildings’ exits, entrances and operable windows. These restrictions are similar to those recently adopted in neighboring cities, such as Emeryville and Oakland.
The bill would require a public hearing at board committee and then a vote whether to adopt the law by the full Board of Supervisors.
In the last decade, more than 30 states have passed legislation that prohibits smoking in public places, including bars and restaurants.
Californians are not the only smokers having trouble giving up the smoke-and-drink combo.
In Minnesota, a recent statewide ban on smoking in restaurants and bars has proprietors and patrons creatively exploiting a loophole in that law, which provides an exception for performers in theatrical productions. Bars are reportedly getting around the ban by printing posters advertising performances and telling patrons to show up in costume.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
|
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
6:16 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Lighting up in taverns under fire"
Report as inappropriate
5:16 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "Lighting up in taverns under fire"
Report as inappropriate
8:45 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "Lighting up in taverns under fire"
Report as inappropriate
4:55 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "Lighting up in taverns under fire"
Report as inappropriate
4:10 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "Lighting up in taverns under fire"
Report as inappropriate
3:16 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "Lighting up in taverns under fire"
Report as inappropriate
Kris Gordon said:
There are so many bars in San Francisco, why not just stay away from the establishments where smoking is allowed? Its not like non-smokers don't have a choice...
4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Does this include bars with outdoor areas?
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Just great. If this was LA, I could go smoke in my car in a parking lot. But this is SF. Can you please tell me how I can smoke 20 feet away from a public building without standing in the middle of a busy street? I live in the Tenderloin, and feel like there may be just one or two more priorities that should be garnering the Ctiy's attention.
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
And San Francisco will find the money to enforce this stricter ban from... where?
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
San Francisco Tobacco Free Coalition looks to be funded by the DPH. Any conflict of interest here?
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Interested Patron said:
Personal attacts from those who can't get their way usually describes a small minded ill tempered writer.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree