
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Alexandria officials want to crack down on what they say are predatory lending practices by heavily taxing payday and car-title lenders.
The city taxes financial services companies, which include stockbrokers, hedge funds and payday lenders, at a rate of 35 cents for every $100 of gross receipts.
Councilman Justin Wilson has proposed creating a subcategory for payday lenders and car-title lenders and taxing them the state limit of 58 cents for every $100.
Payday lenders issue short-term, high interest-rate cash advances to borrowers who can’t wait until their next payday for the money.
The Virginia legislature last month passed a bill that places stricter limits on payday lenders by requiring them to allow borrowers more time to pay back loans and restricting the number of loans they can issue to a single borrower.
“I think that is a positive move forward — I don’t think it’s far enough,” Wilson said.
“The average payday loan of $325 ends up costing the borrower $793,” Deputy City Manager Mark Jinks said. “It’s very expensive, and generally you’ll find payday lenders in the lowest-income neighborhoods where people have the least sophistication in financial services and the biggest need to pay the basic bills.”
Representatives from the Consumer Rights League, a lending industry advocacy group, countered that borrowers end up paying more money in bank overdrafts, bounced checks and late credit fees when the loans are not available to them.
“This tax increase is simply a way to reduce or eliminate payday loan and car title loan shops in Alexandria,” league spokeswoman Kari Scott said. “Consumers are better served by an array of financial tools that compete in a free-market environment.”
Wilson said the $13,000 in revenue from the tax increase would go toward educating borrowers.
“I think one argument the payday industry has made that is very compelling is that there aren’t a lot of financial lending opportunities for low-income folks, and that is certainly a problem,” Wilson said.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
12:23 PM MST on Wed., May. 28, 2008 re: "Voters may decide if payday-loan operators remain after 2010"
Report as inappropriate
11:36 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008
re: "Alexandria seeks to increase taxes on car-title and payday lenders"
Report as inappropriate
11:30 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008
re: "Alexandria seeks to increase taxes on car-title and payday lenders"
Report as inappropriate
6:34 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Alexandria seeks to increase taxes on car-title and payday lenders"
Report as inappropriate
8:37 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008
re: "Payday loans will be capped"
Report as inappropriate
9:46 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 15, 2008
re: "Payday loans will be capped"
Report as inappropriate
10:56 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Legislators unveil payday lending reform package"
Report as inappropriate
3:21 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008
re: "Legislators unveil payday lending reform package"
Report as inappropriate
8:48 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 7, 2008
re: "Legislators unveil payday lending reform package"
Report as inappropriate
1:34 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 12, 2007
re: "Federal reserve researcher critiques ban on payday lending"
Report as inappropriate
1:50 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 19, 2007
re: "Payday loans will be capped"
Report as inappropriate
paydaylendingrep said:
Adults should be given all of the information they need and then allowed to make the decision about what financial products work best for their families and their individual situations. Taking away choices does not help consumers. When faced with an unexpected expense, payday loan customers choose between bouncing a check or overdraft protection, incurring late fees on routine bill payments, borrowing from friends, family or church, taking out a cash advance on a credit card or taking out a payday loan. All of these products have a cost associated with them. Payday loans can be a less costly and/or most desirable option.
3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Less Tax More Teach said:
I applaud Mr. Wilson’s intent, particularly related to educational initiatives—which is the only real solution. However, imposing what appears to be a “penal” tax on these businesses is unjustified and will only hurt the consumer. Why not impose a “penal” tax on other lenders who refuse to serve the credit impaired—the ones turning their backs on these people in need?
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
That expense is just going to be passed on to the consumer as in any business. The amounts of their loans are small and smaller loans require a higher interest rate to make even a small profit. Also, these businesses are not banks that have a pool of money to lend that comes from their deposits. They must borrow all the money they are loaning at their own risk. They have overhead and employees and all the expenses any other institution has. They provide a much needed service to communities and should not be discriminated against like this.
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Whenever I here the debate over the propriety of payday loans come up, it is without fail that two words are mentioned: "predatory" and "uneducated". This is always mentioned in the context of a quote from some lawmaker or "consumer advocate" stating that the payday lending industry is preying on those who are less educated then they are ( I assume this is their opinion since they are insulting people while trying to protect them from a product that they consider to always be a bad decision). The irony of the situation can be summed up by asking a single question. What is cheaper: An overdraft charge of $25.00 or a payday advance fee of $15.00 dollars? Looks like payday loan customers are not that stupid afterall. Can the same be said for these "more-eduacated" lawmakers and so called consumer advocates?
3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Payday Lending Rep said:
Payday advance customers have strong sentiments against the government limiting their access to payday advance. They want to be able to make their own financial choices. The real underlying issue is who should decide how much is too much? Should the government be allowed to put arbitrary limits on consumers' use of a service that may be a better option for them? Based on the reasons customers choose payday advance, limiting their use would in most cases, drive them to more expensive and less desirable alternatives that they had previously tried to avoid.
3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Everone is always whining about payday loans,why don't some one do something about the overdraft protection fees,Boats,scalping tickets and credit cards.You just need to use common sense when using payday loans.Just like when you have 5 credit cards.
4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
A 24 hour "cooling off" period I can deal with, but if I want to waste my money on 40 loans per year, that is my America given right! Why is the government trying to tell us how to get out of debt when they are trillions of dollars in debt themselves. Why are we bailing people out when they are making bad decisions? We need to hold these people responsible for the decisions that they make. The payday lenders should not be blamed for these idiots. Payday loans are not that hard to figure out. You borrow money, then you pay it back on your payday. If you are not going to be able to pay it back, then don't borrow it. Don't cap payday loans, leave them alone for those of us who can use them responsibly.
22 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Supporters of the payday loan industry aren't fighting reform, they're fighting reform that can potentially abolish the industry. Any proposed reformation by legislators insist on stripping all any and all profits from lenders by imposing a 36% APR. Payday loans are a high risk product and a 36% APR will not leave room for error including customer default. It is unfortunate that there is such a huge focus on the APR of payday loans rather than the short-term fee for short-term use. Of course, if you put an APR on a financial product that is only meant to be used for a week or two, it will appear outrageous. There have been several reports completed by non-biased sources stating how the correct use of payday loans by consumers can be beneficial because it allows individuals to better manage their finances.
33 agree | 28 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
cynical said:
You can't protect people from themselves. Borrowers of these loans get themselves in trouble long before they walk into the payday loan office. More laws and rate caps won't change that.
57 agree | 40 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The difference between rich and poor - options and alternatives. This Federal reasearcher's report makes sense. How does an imposed $30+ Overdraft Protection "Fee" (bank payday loan) for ANY amount ($3.00+) make more sense than a sought-out choice for a $30 payday loan for $200-300? Once the banks are done telling you their payday loans are better they will tell you that Universal Default is o.k., too.
37 agree | 41 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mambo said:
Mike, That would be PRINCIPAL not PRINCIPLE. As in pricncipal and interest. Back to grade school :-)
115 agree | 108 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree