Examiner.com // 32 mins ago
ABC7.com // 36 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 6 mins ago
WCBS-TV // 49 mins ago
WCBS-TV // 49 mins ago
7 Online //
7 Online // 2 hrs 46 mins ago
7 Online // 3 hrs ago
WNBC 4 // 2 hrs 20 mins ago
Asbury Park Press // 3 hrs ago
 
   
The City gets dark tonight
Article History
There are updates to this article.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - More than 60 businesses and organizations in San Francisco have vowed to hit the lights today at 8 p.m. for Earth Hour, a global event coordinated by the World Wildlife Fund to raise awareness about climate change.

The Bay and Golden Gate bridges will turn off decorative lights for the event, and on the Peninsula, Brisbane will also take part. San Francisco, representing the Pacific Time Zone, is one of the event’s 25 “flagship” cities worldwide encouraging residents and businesses to turn off nonessential lights from 8 to 9 p.m. For a list of participating organizations, visit www.earthhourus.org/sanfran.php.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

4:05 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "In reversal, city to remove toxic dirt"

Examiner Reader said:
nothing like a pile of dirt in the city!

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:56 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "Steep fees for felled trees — if Belmont has its way"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess the City of Belmont is more worried about saving its dying and hazardous trees than the homeless camps that were being covered by these trees. I personally was happy to see the trees removed I was always worried about the big branches overhanging the roadway that were broken not to mention that the homeless camp was sent packing because they lost their cover of the tree branches hanging down. Why would the city sue them for providing a great service, except they want money from the little guys.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:57 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Toxin-laden dirt poses no threat, according to Baltimore officials"

Examiner Reader said:
You can bet on it that if the pile of dirt had been left in Roland Park, it would be gone PDQ.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Toxin-laden dirt poses no threat, according to Baltimore officials"

Examiner Reader said:
Solution - Either move it or put up a 12 foot high fence around it with security 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week. (whichever is cheaper.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:52 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

Examiner Reader said:
Great. I live two blocks away and walk my dog past that pile of dirt. Wonderful Baltimore. Just wonderful.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

johnn said:
not dixsons clean and green program is it

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:56 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "Greenbelt can continue preservation"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess when the salmon count is so low that wildlife agencies have to place a mandatory ban on fishing to replenish their numbers, and when the whales are about 10-15% thinner, it's a sign that the oceans are stressed out. Kudos to the state Supreme Court for protecting the ocean and giving our coasts protective areas to restore ecosystems and rejuvenate her marine life.

7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:23 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Dark skies for solar-training plan"

Examiner Reader said:
Policy issues related to the solar program need to be vetted before money is spent, McGoldrick told The Examiner in an e-mail. The supervisor characterized Solar City’s threat to abandon The City as “greenmail.” Oh man...can someone please get goldbricker McGoldrick to get a real life, hopefully one not in public service! Geeze if this guy ran the world we would be forever spitting in the wind.

9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:02 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
Next step: Wire Hangers!!! (Dry cleaners don't seem to want them back).

10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
I throw everything I can into the recycling bin and let them decide.

13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:23 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Maryland’s coastal grass continues to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
i think the bicycle built for water is a dum story

14 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:36 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 31, 2008 re: "It's a bicycle built for pure water, too"

Examiner Reader said:
how much will the bike cost?

12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:48 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 29, 2008 re: "The City gets dark tonight"

Examiner Reader said:
Good. Can't wait for the criminals to do a number on the City!

14 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
there are no heading on what each paragraph is about

157 agree | 195 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Bob said:
What concerns me isn't so much all this green stuff; (and green is just a buzz word for Corporate America to make big bucks)what is being done to animal species being wiped off the face of the earth? Polar bear, Rhinos (being slaughered for their horns); elephants, snow tigers, and the list goes on and on;

222 agree | 176 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:43 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Examiner Reader said:
all this green is a bunch of crap....i still burn wood, drive my car alone to work (better than some smelly bus or bart) do not recycle..thats what i pay those garbagemen for. i would rather use my firplace and wood than pay Pacific Grred and Extortion zny of their rip bills.

228 agree | 185 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:21 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Audubon study sees local birds particularly threatened"

Another Examiner Reader said:
Sure nuclear power is "clean." Just ask the Chernobylites.

224 agree | 235 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:56 PM MST on Thu., May. 24, 2007 re: "Experts: Light pollution growing environmental problem"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you for this article. However it needs more development, especially in the area of light trespass onto down hill property. Full cut off on level ground is not full cut off on slopes. Also, motion detectors often activate when a person walks on his own property and is detected by the neighbor's poorly designed/installed system. Please consider this in the future.

646 agree | 424 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
Al Gore should provide more support for nuclear power. When you come to the realization that we have to STOP using fossil fuels, there is nothing else that can produce the huge amount of power that would be required to replace fossil fuels. Nuclear already provides 20% of our electric power. Nuclear power is as cheap or maybe cheaper than coal, especially when you compare 'clean coal' vs. nuclear. It is time we started replacing all of our coal fired power plants with nuclear.

864 agree | 425 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:27 AM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Environmental advisers request study of county’s waste stream"

Sandy Wisner said:
Dear Kelsey, If you take 15% of one portion of a thing and 17% of another portion of the same thing, you will not get 32% of the whole. Depending on the size of the portions, you will have between 15 and 17 percent of the whole.

613 agree | 452 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)