Examiner.com // 10 mins ago
KTLA.com // 15 mins ago
KTLA.com // 18 mins ago
ABC7.com // 49 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 10 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 10 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 17 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 43 mins ago
Examiner.com // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 4 hrs ago
 
   
Candidates could use a lesson in pawn shop economics
Article History
There are updates to this article.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Wonderful. From the loftiness of the presidential race, we learn all about Barack Obama’s intemperate minister, Hillary Clinton’s trip to Bosnia-Herzegovina 12 years ago, where she did not have to duck sniper fire, and John McCain’s take on the housing crisis, in a major speech so remarkable that no one can remember a syllable he uttered 48 hours later.

Meanwhile, down here in anxious America, we have places such as the pawn shop on Liberty Road, in northwest Baltimore County, known as the Liberty Loan and Jewelry Co.

It has a little bit of pop cultural history attached to it. During the administration of George Bush the Elder, a big sign in front of the place read “A Kinder, Gentler Pawn Shop.” Now, in the administration of Bush the Younger, we have people hocking their jewelry in order to buy a few gallons of gasoline for their cars.

“That’s why I’m here,” said John Stevenson, removing a chain from his neck and handing it across the counter to a Liberty Loan employee named Marvin Johnson. “So I can get some gas. This economy’s killing me and my old lady.”

“What do you do for a living?”

“Drive a truck,” said Stevenson, 45. “That’s why I need the gas. Drive a truck and install office furniture.”

“The chain gets you through the week?”

“Seems like every week,” Stevenson said, laughing. “Right now, it’s rough. Been pawning the same chain, over and over. Don’t like doing it. But you do what you gotta do.”

He gets $45 for the chain and will pay 20 percent more to get it back. That’s the going rate. He leaves the shop vowing, “I’ll come back next Friday, when I get paid.”

Stevenson’s followed by a woman lugging in musical equipment: a portable mixer, an equalizer, and a power amp. She’s a little embarrassed about putting her name in the paper but says she plays in a band called Bangladesh Project.

She has to pawn the music equipment in order to raise cash for the security deposit on a place for the band to rehearse.

“The cost of your equipment is more than they’re paying musicians these days,” says a fellow behind the counter named Walt.

The musician laughs in agreement. It’s clear she’s not a first-timer here.

“No, no,” she said. “I’ve been here before. Had to pawn my saxophone to get gas money.”

“That’s what we’re seeing, number one,” says Walt. “People coming in to get money for gas. That, and money to pay their gas and electric bills.”

Both have gone through the roof. The presidential candidates may miss some of this in their zeal to attack each other. After all, it enlightens everyone when Obama’s camp invokes the name of Joe McCarthy from 50 years ago, and Clinton’s camp invokes the name of Judas from 2,000 years ago.

Meanwhile, gasoline prices now average about $3.25 around the country, and oil prices top $100 a barrel, and firms such as the Baltimore Gas and Electric Co. send out monthly bills that are absolutely staggering.

Thus we find such healthy business in places such as the pawn shop on Liberty Road, where Johnson gestures at the day’s inventory. These things, he says, are the valuables people bring in for a quick hit of cash: music equipment, medical equipment, televisions, stereos, power tools, games, jewelry.

“And flat-screen TVs,” he said. “They come in fast, and they go out fast.”

“What about electronic stuff?”

“Not that valuable,” said Walt. “The computer stuff gets out-dated fast. Digital cameras, laptops, camcorders. The technology’s moving so fast, you wind up with something you can’t sell. So we don’t put much value on it.

“Jewelry’s our favorite. It doesn’t depreciate, and it doesn’t take up much space.” He gestures toward a display case filled with rings and necklaces. “Gold. That’s what people are bringing in now, because they’re getting a good price for it. I think it’s close to $1,000 an ounce.”

“Here it is,” said Johnson, scanning the latest figures, “$937 an ounce.”

He’s been in the business for 15 years, the last five of them here. “Now,” he said, “you’ve got people pawning stuff just to pay their mortgage. Or their car payment. Or child care. But the big things you hear, they just need money for gas. Or the gas and electric bill.”

All this, while the presidential candidates talk of Obama’s minister, or Clinton’s trip to Bosnia. Or McCain talks about housing so vividly that it’s already vanished from all memory.

Michael Olesker can be reached at olesker@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

1:03 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

The City that Reads the Examiner said:
So let me get this straight, Mike: there's some doubt about the Mayor being on the take because her price was so low? There's probably a line here about high-priced call-girls versus cheap hookers, but who wants to be accused of sexism?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:00 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

John Q Public said:
Perfectly correct Not! Oleo-sker. Finally someone calling it as it is. I sure hope when I get to make $80,000 for job I can spend that amount of money for my clothes. I am told she purchases few clothes but good quality. That is the difference between a hot dog and a steak. Problem is some can afford only the hotdogs

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:47 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

Not(!) Oleo-esker said:
Michael, Michael, Michael. Federal investigators with search warrants (omitted bothersome fact) don't "barge in". Would you have them make an appointment? Also, the shoes and gifts in question were all luxury class / big ticket items that cost multiple thousands of dollars. No payless shoe store crocs and eco-fleece jackets for our esteemed madame (if the shoe fits...). Keep up the below average work though. You craft some of the best agenda-driven slop liberals can gobble up. "Pure pap for null people" was a term my college professor used often in describing the complicit media drivel. That's my opinion. Anyone else?

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:31 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

John Q Public said:
Olesker is and always has been a tool for the council. He himself fully understands the ramifications for someone who does not come clean with their employer. We are the employers of the council. The Council needs to understand that, and abide by their "employer's" wishes, not reverse previously determined public considerations based on the potential advancement of their careers, or fattening of their bank accounts. If you had an employee that was given gifts and provided trips by a vendor, to make certain decisions for your company , would you have them in your employ long?????...hell no They would be gone. What is the diference here?? I think the "Teflon Leprechan" may be involved here. Check his closet, where are his furs, and Chu shoes?

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:16 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

joek said:
He sounds like he has lunch regularly with Mary Pat Clarke--watch out Mike, you might get stuck up there!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:51 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

Workin Stiff said:
Olesker, the relationship between Da Shoe and Lipscomb was neither complicated or innappropriate, not DISCLOSING it and not RECUSING herself from voting on contracts invoving Lipscombs company was. As for Madam Da Shoe invoking racism and sexism when speaking to the "Afro", what do you think she is attempting to do? She is using false racism and sexism, with a receptive crowd to excuse her own bad behavior. Just call it what it is Olesker, no need to candy coat it--the public, black and white, see what is happening. She is as crooked as THE REST OF BALTIMORES CITY COUNCIL. This body has watched the decline of the of Baltimore without so much as an attempt to fix any of the true problems faced by this town. Grotesquely high property taxes, broken school system, revolving door justice system-- problems spanning YEARS in time. Yet nothing from the silly council to fix these No wonder Baltimore is dieing. The council members only work on setting up themselves/friends with favors

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:29 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

John Q Public said:
Her religious convictions have no bearing on the matter, only her pocketbook. At least she has nice clothes to wear on Sundays

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:10 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

Examiner Reader said:
The part that bugs me is that she sits in church, and the churches stand behind her, shame on her and them. and now shes going to claim racism? Come on! Stand up and be accountable for you actions.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:33 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

Examiner Reader said:
Get real. The city’s Code of Ethics is clear about such matters: Financial disclosure forms must be filed for “any gift with a value of more than $50” from any person doing business with the city. Dixson did not file. She is guilty of a severe ethics violation and needs to be removed from office even if criminal charges are never filed.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:16 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

John Q Public said:
Contractor, sub-contractor. It is al about the meaning of what "is",is. Ref Bill Clinton in his depostion to the prosecutors in Monica-gate. WHO was the relationship with, a contactor or sub-contractor? Monkey business is all that was involved. She is one crafty politico who knows the laws, and attempted to skirt them regularly (re:Utech). She is no dummy. She knows what she should have disclosed. But she has not disclosed past situations like her Sister's position at Utech and the granting of contracts before the Council. Transparent administration indeed. Any city resident and voter should be able to see right through her and past history

4 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:10 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

Examiner Reader said:
As a known plagiarist, you understand that type of arrogance that leads to lies and public deception, don't you, Olesker?

4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:47 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Did Dixon want to hide the affair or the gifts?"

Examiner Reader said:
Dixon just got a little brazen and thought that she could do whatever she wanted to do. She also got caught and I don't know why Black Politicians don't get the message because they do not have the good ole boy network to back them up.

3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:17 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Residents come together to save ‘sacred’ green space in Roland Park"

Examiner Reader said:
As for Keswick's purchase of the BCC property I say this: take care of the patients you CURRENTLY have, and do it WELL before you seek to expand.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:22 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Thanks, Ronald Sallow, for your 41 years of hard work — now leave"

Examiner Reader said:
So now the omalley haters consider Olesker a beacon of truth. typical.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:21 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Thanks, Ronald Sallow, for your 41 years of hard work — now leave"

Examiner Reader said:
So now we know -Ron Sallow must of been a source to Olesker at the Sun. 41 years, must have some pension.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:21 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 2, 2008 re: "Thanks, Ronald Sallow, for your 41 years of hard work — now leave"

Marland Injured Worker said:
I understand and feel sorry for Ronald Sallow but you know there are thousand People who are on workers compensation in Maryland who are Screwed through the broken system. I am one of those and for the past 5 years I and my family have gone through hell. I have had my trunk reposed and almost evicted from my home because the Insurance company plays there games with claimant’s money. And stop them without even a notice then turn around a mouth later and start sending them again. Or Send are checks when they feel like it. It’s all a bunch of BS and the laws that are in place the Insurance companies don’t follow them and nothing is done about it. I had back surgery for my injury that failed then turn around and the insurance company wants me to have another one even as many Doctors and surgeons say that there is only a 30% chance it will help that it may just make things much worse. NO way was i going through another surgery!

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:11 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 2, 2008 re: "Thanks for your 41 years of hard work — now leave"

Rocko said:
Do you think the general assembly is going to launch an investigation into O'Moron's firing practices like it did with Ehrlich? Of course not, O'Malley can do whatever he wants with impunity because he is a democrat. This state sucks.

2 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:28 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 2, 2008 re: "Thanks for your 41 years of hard work — now leave"

Examiner Reader said:
i agree by ron. quit taking my tax dollars. you are an executive now and this state you did not donate to the right potician. i am waiting for the state to get rid of nancy grasmick. hell she is older than 65

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:28 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008 re: "Sad story, but all too familiar"

Examiner Reader said:
This is a truly sad story. It all could have been avoided is what makes it so terrible. Garrison and Liberty Heights was once a nice neighborhood, look at it now. Way to go Olesker and all you liberals, set policies in place that lead to these circumstances. Then move away from the devistation you have promulgated.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:44 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008 re: "Sad story, but all too familiar"

President said:
In honor of Nicole, Put a methedone clinic on every corner where needed. If you try, will you get what you need. Make the right choices from here on out. A bleeding heart will drag a family down.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:44 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 28, 2008 re: "A must-read for every high school student"

Examiner Reader said:
Mr. Olesker, you are a bleeding heart socialist. When school begins again why don't you spend a few days at Douglass High, for instance, and observe what goes on during a typical school day? Perhaps you will then understand that there are certain humans not ready for civilization much less education.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:01 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 28, 2008 re: "Baltimore heals divisions by celebrating diversity"

Examiner Reader said:
"At the Baltimore Pride party, we thought about a time when gays and lesbians had to hide their identities in public, and now they were embracing out in the open." Ah, the good old days, when perverts were secretive.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:36 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008 re: "A must-read for every high school student"

Examiner Reader said:
Michael Olesker, have you ever looked at the budget, or class offerings, for Maryland Public Schools? You think government teachers should owe you an explanation for not using the book in the classroom? Maybe you should owe an explanation to teachers on how you plan for them to pay to use the book in the classroom. If you're so willing to condemn teachers for not using this books in government classrooms, how about you donate the books yourself?

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:39 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "A must-read for every high school student"

Examiner Reader said:
How funny it is that the previous reader seems to perceive Olesker's plea to read C. Fraser Smith's book as sort of favoratism toward black history in Baltimore. As a black person in Baltimore that has read Olesker for years, I see this and everything he writes as the opposite. I see Olesker as a racist of the worst sort...the racist in denial. Olesker has reverence only for black history and meaningless symbolism of black progress. he promotes the idea of equality, but shuns it in reality. Olesker is the most dangerous racist...the fake white liberal.

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:31 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "A must-read for every high school student"

Examiner Reader said:
How are you going to expect all students to read this when most of the high school students in Balto city can't read and only know violence and intimidation. This will be forced upon the white students who are probably tired of being blamed for all the black man's misfortuines. It is fine if someone would like to read this but to force all students to endure this would be unfair. How much more are we supposed to bend ?

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:38 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008 re: "Baltimore heals divisions by celebrating diversity"

Examiner Reader said:
Hey how about an American-white Festival in the City? Hey how about just an all American Festival in the City? I thought we all Americans, Not just Africans, Latinos etc

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:52 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008 re: "Issue of absent fathers brought into the spotlight with Obama"

Examiner Reader said:
In some q munnities absent fathers are epidemic, pandemic and double DD on the mic. Case in point, the mentally handicapped man who was shot by the pohlice on June, 20. This guy is 24,mentally handicapped, no job, living at home, criminal record as long as my dic- tionary and guess what-- he has a baby on the way with some 17 year old hoochie. He also is the father of one child already! I mean what are these hoochies thinking having a child with such a gentleman. Those kids dont stand a chance.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:45 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008 re: "Issue of absent fathers brought into the spotlight with Obama"

Examiner Reader said:
Children need father, it is that simple. Liberals and Hollywood can champion "strong, independent single mothers" who say "I dont need a man". It may be true that single mothers dont need a man, but her children do. You can thank liberal policies of the 60's and 70's and the self aggrandizing baby boomers for this mess. It was they who took the stigma away from out of wedlock pregnancy, in turn producing an entire culture that has child after child with different baby's fathers and baby's mothers. No one is around to raise the poor children. Olesker, did you actually talk to the 4 kids you quote in the story, or did you see 4 kids and make up what YOU think they would say. We all know how you take liberties with the truth. The quotes they say dont sound like something I hear everyday, and I find it very hard to believe 4 black youths would give you the time of day to begin wit.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:18 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008 re: "Issue of absent fathers brought into the spotlight with Obama"

Examiner Reader said:
It's a vicious circle! Black men (and white) need to stick around and raise their children. We really need to empower Black women (all women) to say "no" to having children with these "fly by night" men. However, that probably won't happen because their own father's didn't stick around. The key to this population's success is in the women! They, the women, must start the trend of marriage, then baby. Bridget, Perry Hall

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:34 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008 re: "Issue of absent fathers brought into the spotlight with Obama"

Examiner Reader said:
Here's one for you. Why have the ethnic festivals, which were long held at the easy-to-get-to inner harbor, been moved to the neigborhoods? What is the impact on attendance? What would it take to get them back downtown?

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:03 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008 re: "Issue of absent fathers brought into the spotlight with Obama"

Examiner Reader said:
Olesker has knowingly written a disingenuous article that ignores Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Conservatives. Moynihan, a Liberal himself, and the entire Conservative movement, was pillared by Olesker in the 1970’s as “blaming the victim” for daring to point out the likely consequences the Liberal Aid to Dependent Children Act. Olesker remembers well that the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program had a "man out of the house rule." Moynihan and Conservative critics correctly said that the Government was paying poor women to throw their husbands out of the house and their laws would cause a breakdown of African-American families. Black men did not “stick around” because of the very policies of dependence Liberal Olesker championed. Now, Obama (and his shill, Olesker) propose a new round of Government to “ fix” the problem their Liberal politics created. What chutzpah! Blacks need much less government dependence, not more.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:14 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008 re: "Issue of absent fathers brought into the spotlight with Obama"

Examiner Reader said:
keep voting democrat and being a born loser. They are so corrupt it's not funny anymore.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:51 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 21, 2008 re: "Pressure’s on for Dixon and state investigators"

Examiner Reader said:
Something to think about....Mark Avery (owner of 2 strip clubs on the block and a bails bond agency) dated the Mayor (Ohh, he is a convicted Federal Criminal). Also as a citizen, I would like to see how much money is generally put into the city fund....(wait...WHAT IS THE GENERALLY FUND) and how much is spent. I live in CherryHill..all my life. Does anyone remember who was called the BEAT EM UP BOYS. Clue..look at your baltimore city police staff......top part. Now they want to put us out of Cherry Hill for Donald Trumps new million dollar homes. Come on people.....wake up.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:45 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 21, 2008 re: "Pressure’s on for Dixon and state investigators"

Examiner Reader said:
This is a staged investigation. After all is said and done, the state prosecutors office will announce that the could not get an indictment. Remember...O'Malley runs this office as well. This is all staged to clear her from both State and Federal Investigations. This town is soooo corrupt.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:19 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Pressure’s on for Dixon and state investigators"

Examiner Reader said:
The investigation is politically motivated in a State run by Democrats and Sheila's best bud is the Liberal Democratic Gov and her politcal mentor? LOL. It's a surprise State prosecutor Robert Rohrbaugh has the guts to continue to investigate. Let the chip fall where they may. No one should feel sorry for Sheila. The taxpayers need justice or be ensured there is no polictal crime. Either way the taxpayers win.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:41 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "The never-ending cycle of dissent and threats"

Examiner Reader said:
I saw a T.V program once where the Police in an American City was stopping Gang Members and photographing them, without there permission, and taking their names. Gathering information to be used later. Is this constitutional? I am a photographer i I have been told to always get a "Model release" from people just in case the photographs are published. Keeping information about people who don't commit crimes is reminds of Facist or Communist countries, who want to keep track of everbody.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:33 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "The never-ending cycle of dissent and threats"

Examiner Reader said:
I wonder how many of the NSA protesters have served in the military? Probably NONE. I'm sure they were arrested because they either crossed the protest line setup by NSA or there was an indication of physical threats to NSA employees. Get a life granny (and Olesker) and protest something worth protesting... like the price of GAS!

2 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:09 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "The never-ending cycle of dissent and threats"

Examiner Reader said:
Sure....yet the GOP is being investigate for shady contracts in Maryland this very day. It ain't O'Malley buddy, it politicians in general. The problem is, you GOP seem t only complain about O'Malley and Democrats. Most of the GOP base in Maryland is poor, yet you are dumb enough to but the crap they feeed you every few yearts and you vote for them, againt you own economic interests. Dems are the same, stop acting like you know better.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:55 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 16, 2008 re: "Ehrlich’s campaign hidden in plain view"

Examiner Reader said:
God i hope Erlich runs again and blows O'malley out of the water, O'malley's doing to the state that he did with the city.

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:07 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 16, 2008 re: "Tim Russert and Jim McKay true to themselves and viewers"

Examiner Reader said:
i am sorry the russert died, however who cares. i mean the amount of media coverage is absurd. this man is not the president, heck i know of a man down the street who was a good citizen and nice to his community who passed away a month ago. there was no fan fair. please you journalists are no different than ordinary people. i know you think you are more inteligent because you report the news but here is a flash for you: you are actually more gullible.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:22 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 16, 2008 re: "Tim Russert and Jim McKay true to themselves and viewers"

Examiner Reader said:
Legalization of gay marriage in California is a good news for GLBT. One of my friends, who found her another part on the online community BiLoves, decided to get married recently. Hope they have a great marriage life.

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:23 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "‘The sorest loser that ever lived’"

Examiner Reader said:
Olesker is contemptable, dishonest, and unlikeable. Why is he still around?

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:32 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "‘The sorest loser that ever lived’"

Examiner Reader said:
Examiner Reader said: Leave it to Olesker to find something bad to say about Earl Weaver. =People cant understand this article is a tribute to the man and the city and the old Orioles magic! Read the whole thing before judging it, people!

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:50 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "The transformation of Baltimore is simply a delight to witness"

Examiner Reader said:
Yes the transformation od Baltimore is a delight to watch. Baltimore has transformed into a city where the very man , Donald Schaefer, for the transformation of the inner harbor and consequently much of the greater region cannot be honored. Those in charge of the city rename everything and anything to celebrate ANY success of blacks or women. But could not find a way to place a statue of Mayor Schaefer on the inner harbor promenade. Yes what a delight Baltimores transfermation has become.

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:32 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "‘The sorest loser that ever lived’"

Examiner Reader said