OT costing city millions
Article History
There are updates to this article.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - With doomsday budget talk increasing, attention again turned to city overtime spending.

An increase of $171 million over last year in overtime is projected for this fiscal year, which ends June 30, according to a Budget Analyst’s report released late Tuesday.

As the overtime costs are climbing, Mayor Gavin Newsom is also calling for more oversight by departments.

Newsom is expected to issue an executive order today requiring departments to report monthly to the Mayor’s Budget Office on their overtime usage and propose specific actions to cut back if they exceed the budgeted monthly expenditure, said Nani Coloretti, the mayor’s budget director.

The City’s projected expenses are $61.9 million over what was budgeted for overtime, and spending has increased every year since 2003-04 as a percentage of what The City spends on salaries, according to the report, which was released amid a swirl of proposals to cut city spending.

Major departments have asked for more overtime funds in 2008-09. Some departments are forced to utilize overtime because of mandated staffing levels and staffing shortages, and others find it more economical to spend on overtime rather than hire fulltime employees with benefits.

Budget Analyst Harvey Rose said the overtime spending was a significant factor of the projected $338 million budget deficit. “If we didn’t have this additional overtime we could subtract $61 million from that,” Rose said.

People who read this also read:

Name
Comments

characters left

Article Comments

Comments from Examiner Readers

9:52 PM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "OT costing city millions"

Examiner Reader said:
Some people are forced to work overtime while other people can't find good work. Can't laws and policies be adjusted to make bringing in new people (full-time, part-time, job-sharing, temporary, etc.) cost less than mandating overtime?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:11 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008 re: "City�s pruning may begin at the top"

Examiner Reader said:
Do the Stupervisors make over $150K? If not maybe they can lower the limit and get rid of themselves.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:09 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008 re: "City�s pruning may begin at the top"

Examiner Reader said:
I believe this when its actually implemented. Between employee uninons and civil service status, it makes it difficult to terminate anyone at city hall.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:54 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 22, 2008 re: "Budget deficit balloons $100 million in latest projections"

Examiner Reader said:
Why doesnt the mayor ask his good friends the Gettys to help him close the deficit? Or better yet all of the wealthy eliteists in this city who help push the liberal programs that get us into this mess.Dont put measures on the ballot unless you can provide the funds to pay for them. Lets stop the madness and start running our govt more like a business and not a non profit org!

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
INCLUDED
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)