
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Basketball officials are out of control. Stanford’s overtime win on Saturday in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament, after the first-half ejection of coach Trent Johnson, was the latest example that they don’t understand this simple dictum: They’re not supposed to be the show.
This was even worse than the bad calls that gave UCLA wins over Stanford and Cal in the last week of the Pac-10 season and USC a win over Arizona State in the conference tournament. That was simply incompetence, and those of us who watch Pac-10 sports know that’s the standard, both in basketball and football.
Saturday’s game, though, was a referee showing the coach who was boss, to the detriment of the game.
Referee Curtis Shaw "explained" Johnson’s ejection by saying the coach had come out onto the floor when no timeout had been called, which got him his second technical. But Shaw evaded the real question: Why was Johnson flagged (by David Hall) for the first “T”? I know Trent Johnson and I know he isn’t an abusive person, so I’m certain he was assertive but not abusive in his protest. So, coaches aren’t allowed to dispute a call?
If anything, coaches should be allowed more leeway in a tournament game. In the past, they have been. This was the first time a coach had been ejected in a tournament game since 2003.
And, by the way, this was the first time Johnson has ever been ejected from a game. Nice timing, guys.
Though it got overlooked, the officials made another call that had a serious impact on Stanford’s chances, calling Robin Lopez for a technical for jawing with a Marquette player after he was fouled on a second-half play. That gave Lopez three fouls and sent him to the bench for a time.
Announcer Dick Enberg commented first that officials were trying to keep players from getting out of control, then added, "but the officials are out of control themselves." Said analyst Jay Bilas: "If I were out there, I wouldn’t say a word to these officials. They really have a hair trigger."
Once again, I say the officials should never be the focus of a game and that applies even more when the stakes are this high.
Johnson’s ejection momentarily put the Cardinal in a hole. Stanford was leading by a point at the time, but Wesley Mathews converted four straight free throws, two of them for the technicals, and Marquette quickly built an 11-point lead.
But coaching is more than just game-time strategy. Johnson has built a team that battles through adversity, and the Cardinal rallied to cut the Marquette lead to six at the half and finally won it in overtime on a shot by, of course, Brook Lopez.
That puts the Cardinal into the Sweet 16 against Texas, another tough matchup because the Longhorns have good 3-point shooters. Against Marquette, Stanford stayed in a zone defense for most of the first half to cut off penetration by the much-quicker Marquette guards, who are not good outside shooters. They won’t have that luxury against Texas and, once again, it will be the Lopez twins battling against a better-balanced team.
Let’s hope this time the officials will let the players play and coaches coach. Just look in the mirror, guys, and repeat after me: Nobody pays to see us.
Glenn Dickey has been covering Bay Area sports since 1963 and also writes on www.GlennDickey.com. E-mail him at glenndickey@hotmail.com.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
9:08 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 12, 2008 re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
10:26 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
6:16 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
3:29 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
3:08 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
12:49 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
10:31 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
It won't matter to Stanfurd what they do in football and basketball [men's] as long as they continue to pile up the points in the suburban sports and continue to win the Sear's Cup. The 2 sports don't add enough points to be meaningful for them to want to change their approach.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Puzzled, The point is whether or not Stanford does indeed have such high admissions standards they we cannot compete in sports. I made the point that some people with rather questionable 'smarts' have been admitted...Condi being a case in point. Based upon her political acumen, I'd rather have Brooke Lopez representing us in foreign affairs.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Puzzled said:
Perhaps I'm not informed but what does Condi Rice have anything to do with athletics?
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am a Stanford Graduate, class of 1999, and am the one who posted the Condi Rice comment. In fact, I'm also a graduate of the Standord Business School Class of 2006.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Your comment on Condi Rice shows you wouldn't have a chance at getting admitted to Stanford.
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
John, Lafayette said:
I once heard Mike Montgomery say on that he was chagrined when he once lost a player because of Stanford's admission standards. So where did that player go? Yale. Could it be that Stanford is so noble because they have more than enough money to fund the other sports so they don't need winners or sell outs of football and basketball.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I guess Stanford tightened its academic standards after Condi Rice was admitted.
7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree