CHANGE MY LOCATION
Greenhouse gas bill clears hurdle
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: Annapolis
Annapolis (Map, News) - Substantial cuts in state emissions of greenhouse gases over the next 12 years would be mandated under a bill given tentative approval in the Senate on Thursday.
But approval came after amendments were added to allow the governor to delay the deadlines if they were causing economic harm and to force the Department of the Environment to submit reduction measures to lawmakers for enactment.
The Senate rejected an amendment to exempt the Sparrows Point steel plant in Dundalk from the emissions standards as steelworkers watched from the balcony.
“We’d rather not be doing this,” said Sen. Paul Pinsky, a Prince George’s County Democrat and sponsor of the bill. He said he wouldn’t have offered the bill “if the White House had done something.”
The bill requires a 25 percent reduction in greenhouse gases by 2020. An original mandate for a 90 percent reduction by 2050 has become a goal. Gov. Martin O’Malley supports the measure.
Sen. Nathaniel Exum, a Prince George’s County Democrat, wanted the legislature to have the final say on regulations to cut emissions. “It’s very difficult to pass emergency legislation and stop something we don’t like,” Exum said.
Supporting the change, Senate Republican leader David Brinkley asked, “How many times have we passed something where we say, ‘Oops, that’s not what we intended.’?”
Pinsky said other amendments “didn’t do much damage” but Exum’s change “concerns us.” He was afraid lobbyists “would swarm” Annapolis trying to weaken efforts to reduce greenhouse gases.
Sens. Norman Stone, a Dundalk Democrat, and Nancy Jacobs, R-Harford, tried to exempt the steelworkers. “The problem with this industry is there is currently not the technology” to reduce emissions further, Stone said. That amendment failed.
llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com
Comments from Examiner Readers
11:59 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "States Sue EPA Over Global Warming"
Report as inappropriate
10:52 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "17 states sue to force EPA to respond to Supreme Court ruling"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
How many of these "chicken little" politicians have done an impact statement on the paychecks of their constituants BEFORE they signed on to this SCHAM !!!
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Since this administration has totally ignored every court and congressional order to date, what makes anyone think they will honor this? Hello out there, time to hold their feet to fire so to speak, demand accountability for this and all the other acts against this country's well being that have been conducted by this administration.
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree