Examiner.com // 21 mins ago
ABC7.com // 38 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 59 mins ago
ABC7.com // 59 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 6 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 32 mins ago
Examiner.com // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
Examiner.com // 4 hrs ago
ABC7.com // 5 hrs ago
 
   
Dickey: NellieBall can't work in playoffs
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Warriors coach Don Nelson may want to mix things up come playoff time.
(Jeff Gross/Getty Images)
Warriors coach Don Nelson may want to mix things up come playoff time.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Watching the Warriors is like watching a movie you’ve seen several times. You know how it will turn out.

In Don Nelson’s first six years with the Warriors, his teams made the playoffs four times but got past the first round only twice. In the 1988-89 season, the Warriors beat Utah in the first round, but lost to Phoenix in the second round. In 1990-91, they beat San Antonio in the first round, then lost to the Los Angeles Lakers in the second round.

Oddly, the Nelson teams that were most successful in the regular season — the 1991-92 team, which won 55 games, and the 1993-94 team that won 50 games — didn’t get past the first round.

When Nelson left, the Warriors fell into the abyss, not to re-emerge until he returned last season. The Warriors closed with a rush to make the playoffs, upset the Dallas Mavericks in the first round — and then got stomped by the Jazz in the second round.

This season looks like more of the same. The Warriors are playing at a pace that would get them more than 50 wins, which is what it will take to get in the playoffs in the terrifically strong Western Conference, but the old playoff pattern for Nelson teams will surface after that. Don’t look for the Warriors to get past the second round.

Why this disparity? Because the playoffs are much different than the regular season.

The NBA season is much too long; competitively, it would be much better if it were no more than 60 games long. The frequency of games wears out players and doesn’t give coaches much chance to prepare for individual games. Both of these factors work to the advantage of Nelson’s teams. The Warriors have to be better conditioned than the NBA norm to play Nelson’s fast-tempo offense, so they’re better able to cope with the tiring schedule. Because his style of play is unusual, other teams aren’t prepared for it.

Neither of those conditions applies in the playoffs. Games and travel are reasonably spaced, so players aren’t exhausted. That spacing also allows opposing coaches time to game plan for the Warriors.

These two changes also mean that playoff basketball often slows into a matchup of halfcourt offenses, and the Warriors don’t fare well in that kind of matchup (see last year’s playoff games against Utah) because of their lack of big men.

Again, this is a trademark of Nelson teams. The Run TMC teams (Tim Hardaway, Mitch Richmond and Chris Mullin, now the executive vice president of basketball operations) didn’t have an effective big man until Nelson got Chris Webber, a move that did not turn out well.

The only big man who gets many minutes on this team is Andris Biedrins, and his average is not much more than half a game, almost 27 minutes per contest. The Warriors traded Jason Richardson during last year’s draft for Brandan Wright. Though Wright has played very well when he’s been in there, he’s only played in 29 games, averaging less than 10 minutes a game. Other young big men — Patrick O’Bryant and Kosta Perovic — are non-factors.

So, here we go again. Don’t get me wrong: I love the Nelson style, which has made the Warriors the NBA’s most exciting team in the regular season. I’d just like to see a script change for the playoffs. I hate this ending.

Glenn Dickey has been covering Bay Area sports since 1963 and also writes on www.GlennDickey.com. E-mail him at glenndickey@hotmail.com.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

10:25 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 24, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

Examiner Reader said:
The reason Nelson didn't play Wright and Bellini is, I think, linked to his salary bonus. I'm guessing he would have got a fat bonus for geting the Warriors into the playoffs, and he didn't want to risk it. At this stage of his life Nelson is coaching for money, and I think this influenced his playing rotation last season. Nelson was fixated on geting into the playoffs, even though the Warrriors would have had trouble geting past the first round. Nelson is in the waning days of his career, so he's making short term decisions, he doesn't care about the future. That's why the Warriors would be better off without Nelson.

2 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:40 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

jason said:
um, it's obvious. think of which high school players made immediate impacts vs which took some time before becoming who they eventually became. yup, the loosely termed "NBA body". There probably are exceptions, but likely to be guards if anything. One look at the 1st Hawks game tells you all you need to know. As w/ nearly all young players (who need experience to make defensive reads & rotations second nature), Wright is not a good help defender yet, but he has plenty of flashes. And he's also decent when the offensive player faces him up. The problem is the low block. Once Josh Smith stopped trying to drive by him & posted up, he absolutely abused Wright. Also check out the 2nd Sixers game & you'll notice how easily Reggie Evans boxes out Wright. Wright started out at 200 lbs & could only bench 185 lbs twice. On your standard 45 lb bar, that's just one 45 lb weight & one 25 lb weight on each side. Hell, he needed 10 lbs & 10 more reps just to match Thad Young.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:09 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

Examiner Reader said:
if they let ellis get away i leave to. i will become a laker fan

1 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:41 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

Examiner Reader said:
For a guy that watches the Warriors close up, you're really bad at evaluating talent. Take a look at his highlight reel from last year. Are you in for every single thing Nellie has done? Did you even watch the Finals? Defense wins. Nellie doesnt care about defense. Other things Nellie has done: allow horrible shot selection, no defense, Pietrus can step out of bounds, Webber will provide us veteran leadership and not mess with AB, Mbenga will provide us interior presence, playing Pat Burke heavy minutes in Summer league will be good, POB sucks, Belli is going to start, bench baron the last game of the season when they been partying all year and playing lazy, lose every big game at the end of the year, not playing subs because playing them we would lose games but the opposite happenned; playin the starters too much caused us to lose games. now he's already said playin the young guys next year will lose his games. Looks like he covering himself from public criticism with that comment.

7 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:52 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Is Nelson wrong on Wright?"

Examiner Reader said:
It seems no one is willing to criticize Nelson. He has an uncanny ability to select good players in the draft but he is horrid at developing young talent, and that is no exaggeration. No player seems to play at their best under him, not even Nowitzki or Nash. Neither became MVP under him. They both played better under other coaches. That is theonly reason he never won an NBA championship. he's had some very good teams with somevery good players, but his style of coaching is so depreciating to his players that none of them can play their best ball. He personally demeans them, and seldom gives positive reinforcement. Because of it he will never win an NBA championship which is tragic because he is a good coach, and especially good in the draft. But his negative style will never work for him or anyone else. I think it is too late for him. He is too old and stubborn to change.

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:18 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

WellInformed said:
Doesn't matter anyway, Ellis is an Early Bird Free Agent and can only be offered the average player salary (about $5.5 mil) in the first two years of an offer sheet. This is known as the Gilbert Arenas rule. How this writer who supposedly covers the NBA doesn't know this is beyond me. And again, you Grizzlies fans need to study up on cap holds. Your picks will make $3-$4 million.

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:05 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

Examiner Reader said:
Ummm... being a Grizzles fan living in Memphis, I've been hearing that it is very UNLIKELY that Juan Carlos is back with the team. Maybe they can do a sign and trade him. Therefore, it is very LIKELY that they will offer Mr Ellis a very FRONTLOADED lucrative contract. I like him a lot, but don't know exactly how much he's worth to the Grizz, but I guess we'll see.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:58 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

Examiner Reader said:
the JR trade exception expires before free agency opens this season. Also, the Grizz do have more than $10M, it's actually more like $14M. They cap will be about $58 million. The Grizz have about $44M under contract. That's $14M left for free agents. Because there is a salary cap exception for re-signing your own players, they can wait to sign Navarro (and their draft picks) until after they have signed outside free agents because they can go over the cap to sign the in-house guys.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:39 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

Examiner Reader said:
Warriors may have more cap space than the Grizzlies with the 10MM trade exception from the JRich trade.

3 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:24 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors play waiting game"

WellInformed said:
Um, check your math. When you include the salary the Grizzlies are going to have to give the No. 5 pick plus the cap hold for Juan Carlos Navarro, I don't believe the Grizzlies will have anything close to $10 million to offer. Much closer to the $5.5 million everyone has with the mid-level exception.

3 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:31 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 19, 2008 re: "Walcoff: Don't cry if Nellie walks"

robd said:
this is an outstanding analysis. after watching Nelson's work over the last two years, good and bad, i completely understand why Cuban booted him out of Dallas. if the Warriors played with a shred of discipline they would have picked up the few games they needed to best the equally undisciplined Nuggets. and please don't say their success is predicated on the their unpredictability. you can play an aggressive, free flowing style and still take good shots in rhythm after moving the ball to the open man. baron has a dominant mid-range in to the rim game, who can step out and hit threes when he has it going, not the reverse. jackson cannot dribble and slows the flow too much, and harrington was jerked around so much i'm surprised his neck is not broken. and don't get me started on the young bigs and azuibuke...i am not delusional, the warriors underperformed because of their coach. nelson was a critical part of the turn-around, but he is well-beyond the point of diminishing returns...

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:42 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Official's call negates great games"

Examiner Reader said:
Matt, seems a point is being overlooked here. Not so long ago (last season) we had a ref that was busted for betting on games...seems to me the league should be doing everything it can to establish and maintain credibility of the ref's...from my admitadly slanted perspective the two games with LA were called overwhelmingly in favor of LA...this aside the blatant "blown" call at the end of game two could certainly be interpreted as a last push by the ref's to give the game to LA...sickening...we just turned the game off in disgust!

10 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:47 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Official's call negates great games"

Regulator of the truth said:
Dear Matt. You mentioned that people will focus on the last 3 second instead of the previous 95 minuts and 57 seconds. But the game went into overtime. I think you meant to say 100 minutes and 57 seconds. I left scratching my head in disbelief.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:29 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 21, 2008 re: "Dickey: NellieBall can't work in playoffs"

John, Lafayette said:
It must be that Nellie just doesn't know how to develop or recruit big men. By the way he treats the new guys, he doesn't even like to play them. There are players on the team who could be much more valuable, but Nellie doesn't allow them to develop. He just loves small ball.

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:27 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 12, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Much was learned during trip"

Examiner Reader said:
Another idiotic article

7 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:30 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 18, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors are pure entertainment"

Matt (SF) said:
Steinmetz. Explain how Nellie is, "among the biggest pieces of work roaming the sideline for any team these days." I'm baffled.

36 agree | 41 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:18 PM MST on Sat., Feb. 2, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: C-Webb brings questions with him"

Bass said:
Besides some improper grammar, the idea that a broken down defensive liability is going to help the squad shows your inability to be objective. Go Diplomats!

42 agree | 44 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:05 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 30, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: C-Webb brings questions with him"

Dave Biagini said:
I just hope that Weber can make up for messing up this franchise for years by being a piece that will help the team. This move is one of the classiest moves I have ever seen in sports. Chris Mullin is really starting to building a legacy here. These moves by Mullin are unprecidented in sports. It would be akin to having say Bush and Bin Laden enjoying dinner and a cigar. Well, that might be going a little to far but you probably get my point Now, How about bringing back Spreewell. I think he can still play and probably wants to.

37 agree | 44 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:21 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Warriors are pure entertainment"

slicksteven said:
great article man, spot on

68 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.17 seconds)