Zoo chided for tiger mauling response
Article History
There are updates to this article.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Disbelief from zoo staff members, limited access to radios and guns, a lean zoo crew and a low moat wall were all factors to blame in the fatal tiger attack at the San Francisco Zoo on Christmas Day, according to the results of an investigation by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

The zoo lacks personnel to “effectively train, oversee and enforce existing policies and procedures,” a report released by the agency’s accreditation commission Tuesday concluded. “The zoo is often chasing problems rather than proactively addressing known concerns,” it said.

A month after a 4-year-old Siberian tiger named Tatiana escaped her grotto and fatally mauled a 17-year-old visitor and injured two of his friends, investigators with the AZA interviewed zoo employees and officials as well as city representatives. Tatiana killed 17-year-old Carlos Sousa Jr., of San Jose, after he tried to intervene while the tiger attacked his friend, Paul Dhaliwal. Paul and his older brother, Kulbir, then fled to a zoo cafe and asked for help from the manager, who refused the young men admittance because of their “erratic behavior.”

The manager also violated protocol by not administering first aid, according to the report. But such contract personnel were never included in emergency drills, the report said.

When the attack occurred around 5 p.m., the zoo manager on duty had left for the day, as well as 29 of 31 animal-care personnel and two of three veterinarians assigned to work. Visitors were allowed to roam the park after the 5 p.m. closing time, the report said.

Tatiana appeared to have escaped her enclosure where the moat wall was 12 inches shorter, a result of material being added in 1982 to improve drainage, according to the report.

Additionally, keys to zoo vehicles and the area of the zoo where the guns are held were not readily available for staff responding to the incident, and radios were locked away by zoo staff who had left early, the report noted.

Nonetheless, the report applauded the “exceptional response” by zoo staff to the incident.

Michael Cardoza, the attorney for the Sousa family, addressed the “skeleton crew” working at the zoo that day. “That’s, to me, tantamount to saying, ‘We have 10,000 people rioting, and for the two cops that were there they did a great job,’” he said.

The zoo will keep its accreditation from the association, but it must submit a written report to the AZA by the end of 2008 on security and safety changes it made, then undergo a second inspection from the AZA in early 2009, Manuel Mollinedo, president of the San Francisco Zoo, told The Examiner.

“We’ve really had to re-evaluate everything we’re doing,” Mollinedo said.

dsmith@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

1:51 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008 re: "Tiger mauling victim’s family to file lawsuit"

Examiner Reader said:
Why doesn't Souza's family sue the two Dhaliwal Brothers? You know that they have a history of trouble, and look what happened to the Souza's son. The Dhaliwal Brothers are responsible in a way for the incident. I feel sorry for Souza Family but not for the Dhaliwals.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:08 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 3, 2008 re: "Mauling victim was on drugs and alcohol"

Examiner Reader said:
well....lets do a drug test of all employees at the zoo...clearly these boys are idiots but even idiot's shall be safe in a controlled enviorment.But there is no excuse for the idiocracy of the S.F zoo lack of detail on there facility and regulations of proper equipment hieght size ect .

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:10 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 3, 2008 re: "Mauling victim was on drugs and alcohol"

Tiger Taunters = Scumbags said:
So Souza, who was underage, had alcohol and pot in his system on that fateful day at the zoo, and was standing on the railing of the tigers' cage. And we're supposed to feel sorry for the sad fate to which he came? He sounds like a complete nimrod whose death was entirely the result of his own stupidity. His friends are no better - both the Dhaliwal brothers (one of them is facing felony shoplifting charges) have had numerous run-ins with the law. They're also imbeciles, and I don't feel an iota of sympathy for any of them.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:49 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 24, 2008 re: "Mauling survivors face prior misdemeanor charges"

Examiner Reader said:
Don't worry, boys. Those chains are made of chrome steel!

57 agree | 75 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:33 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 24, 2008 re: "Mauling survivors face prior misdemeanor charges"

Examiner Reader said:
No one and I mean no one will really ever know what happened, other than the two brothers who seem to be more interested in a nice pay day than anything else. The entire scenario is a bit suspicious at best. Same old story. Humans destroy beautiful creatures natural home, humans imprison creature in a cage to protect creature from extinction due to human impact. An incident occurs and then humans go back and forth as to who is at fault, with some even saying the tiger is to blame. Like a tiger understands what the words "kill" or "attack" even mean. It's so silly what the media will do to sell newspapers. Humans won't be happy until all beautiful creatures are completely gone from this earth and then the earth itself will be next. Then of course, they'll be looking for a way to get off the planet so they can do it all over again. Whatever man fears he seeks to destroy and he fears almost everything, including others, and thus humans are busy killing, destroying, consuming, and reduc

91 agree | 90 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:55 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunate for Sousa. Tragic indeed for Taty - a victim for being voiceless, bred over many generations for survival to do what was only natural, instinctual for her to do, and then to be incarcerated, then tuanted to the end. Truly tragic...and what appears to be montrous behavior by the brothers. It's times like this that make me want to make a contribution to places like Nature Conservancy of Calif which protects habitat.

88 agree | 60 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:08 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

Examiner Reader said:
I am very sorry for what happen to this young man but why in the hell would you get drunk and go to the zoo looking for trouble they knew what they were doing and it is too bad somebody had to die not just the young man but also a animal who did would any animal would do if provoked i dont think they deserve a penny sometimes we have to learn that we are responsible for our own actions.

106 agree | 56 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:40 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

Dave Scott said:
It's really too bad that these idiots WILL get a setlement. SF Zoo is responsible for keeping ALL of its visitors, even if a couple dingdongs were taunting Tatiana. Kitty justice is served. May I suggest to the future plaintiff(s), take that money and get an education, so you can teach others not to act so stupid. I'm sorry for your loss.

77 agree | 62 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:56 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

ALF is a compliment said:
Actually, if 13yr olds taunting monkeys caused ear-biting, then the real circus would not be happening. This 'circus' is happening because of animals being taunted. The victims were also criminals, you should have to agree.

84 agree | 62 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:26 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

Examiner Reader said:
You may not be able to predict nature, but karma is pretty easy to figure out.

75 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:16 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

get outa iraq said:
I have to say that the spin on incrimintating these VICTIMS is more atrocious than the fact that a tiger was born and died in captivity. The taunting allegations are not signifigcant. I've seen 13 year olds taunt monkeys and if one of them were to have escaped and chewed an ear off, this circus wouldn't be happening. It is cruel to breed animals in captivity. I think the lesson to be learned is you can't predict nature. She may bite, even if it's leaping bounds over what mankind thought possible.

106 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:12 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

Examiner Reader said:
Criminal charges are in order to the SF Zoo administrators. The tiger should not have been able to get out of its cage for whatever reason. This includes the vulgar behavior which also needs to be reprimanded.

98 agree | 76 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:37 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

Examiner Reader said:
What an utter tragedy. Tatiana was truly a beautiful and majestic cat. Those punks will inevitably have a day of reconing coming one way or another. They may have been able to out-run that tiger until help arrived, but there's really no way to out run Karma is there?

89 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:17 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

Examiner Reader said:
so the wall height at this cage has been like that many years without a tiger jumping out and attacking anybody and it's the zoo's fault? first, it's a wild animal. second, the brothers were both drunk and high and seen taunting the animal. third, they have changed their story and lied at least twice now. who do you believe? i for one think that the brothers have to take some responsibility for their actions, but they won't. welcome to america where you can do whatever you want and blame somebody or some animal for it when everything goes wrong.

88 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:05 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

Examiner Reader said:
6:54 were you born in wyoming?just wondering about the education system there.

91 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:28 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Critical Thinker said:
How many more victims if the tiger wasn't shot?? Two. Two more victims because three guys picked on her, so she'll get all three if she can. She bolted past other people and had no interest in them. Tigers don't just kill, they have reasons.

68 agree | 62 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:26 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "No headstone for Tatiana"

Examiner Reader said:
First of all, the tiger deserved to get killed by the SFPD. If that wasn't the case, how many more victims would it attack? secondly, its the zoo to blame as well. the wall's height is too short. what they should do is tear down this old stupid zoo, rebuild it from scratch. make it safer, more modernize and everybody will have a better experience there. i bet sooner or later, some type of animal will escape from its enclosure. they got lucky on the leopard last time. but as we all know this saying, dont push our luck too far

49 agree | 67 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:23 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Critical Thinker said:
This is turning into a legendary event. Depending on how the case goes, we'll have a nice Made-for-TV movie script. It's a modern day fairy tale, with many readers/comments building the tale. Poor Tatiana ... oh, the brothers! AARGH! The more we learn, the more we see they'll never regret the pain, suffering, fear and expen$e they caused to so many. It's likely they are proud of these accomplishments. For them, being feared and loathed by the general public is a goal they've been working towards for years. Their carefully composed outfits and hairstyles are geared to engender fear. That's why the zoo cafe workers wouldn't open the door. An obese woman aged 50 screaming and bloody would have been rescued. The brothers' schtick backfired hugely when they were the ones in need. OOPS.

49 agree | 55 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 21, 2008 re: "Victims of tiger mauling may face manslaughter charges"

Examiner Reader said:
this is a no win situation 4 anyone..the life of a useless punk is gone,and a rare tiger is forever lost.ambulance chasing attorney and nothing .. they did it just like o.j. that tiger was lifted by a body when they held on another in, by each others hands..they found blood on the sign..its just a matter of time fluff attorney or not..

81 agree | 103 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:19 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 21, 2008 re: "Victims of tiger mauling may face manslaughter charges"

Examiner Reader said:
the two coniver punks will get off from all charges,they will make money from this,and the coniver judge and attorneys will be tv stars.its the american way.

78 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:08 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 20, 2008 re: "Victims of tiger mauling may face manslaughter charges"

Examiner Reader said:
The zoo is no place for rowdy punks who are drinking and high on drugs. Guilty, Guilty, Guilty and their lawyer is a LIAR!!

87 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:37 AM MST on Sun., Jan. 20, 2008 re: "Victims of tiger mauling may face manslaughter charges"

Examiner Reader said:
Don't trust the zoo!! The facility is inadequate to contain the animals, and zoo security is incapable of monitoring rowdy guests and detecting escaped animals. Go there at your own risk and understand that anything that happens to you and your kiddies is like to be YOUR fault.

74 agree | 76 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:13 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 19, 2008 re: "Victims of tiger mauling may face manslaughter charges"

Examiner Reader said:
Not only should the city file manslaughter charges against the Dhaliwal brothers but also file charges for contributing to the delignquency of a minor and the cost to the city expended for medical and police time. The Sousa family should sue them for causing the death of their son and the San Francisco Zoological Society should also sue them for the losses incurred. These brothers are scumbag punks who don't deserve a dime.

97 agree | 67 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:16 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 19, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
When will Geragos issue an apology for LYING to the public when he said the two brothers did not taunt the tiger? Feed the Geragos to the tigers. And the the two Dhaliwal brothers as well. Charge a pay0for-view fee and buy another toger for the zoo with the proceeds.

72 agree | 51 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:14 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 19, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
The responding cops shot the srong animal. It's pretty evident to even liberal san franciscans that the real dangerous animals in this case walk on two legs.

70 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:31 AM MST on Sat., Jan. 19, 2008 re: "Victims of tiger mauling may face manslaughter charges"

Examiner Reader said:
First the brothers wouldn't cooperate with police, in fact they wouldn't identify their dead friend. Then they say they weren't taunting it, now they say they were? They are looking for a big payout and they should receive nothing. What happened to parents teaching their children that they are responsible for their actions and must take the consequences of those actions? What is wrong with parents who excuse everything their children does which ruins this city for the rest of us? If they are awarded money, what message is that sending out to other young people?

104 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:58 AM MST on Sat., Jan. 19, 2008 re: "Mauling survivors face prior misdemeanor charges"

Examiner Reader said:
High-powered attorney, Michael Cardoza, representing the family stated, " the Dhaliwals not only want Carlos Sousa Jr. to be remembered, but they also want to ensure nobody’s hurt at the zoo again." I think we should be more afraid of them instead of animals at the zoo. These idiots are the one's that should be put in a cage. Who will their next victim be?

89 agree | 76 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:01 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 18, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Brothers are idiots said:
The paramedics heard the brothers saying, "don't tell them what we did." So do you believe that all they did was stand on the railing and scream???? NO! They did a whole lot more than that. And I don't believe the tiger "just jumped out of the bushes from no where" either. The brothers must have at least slung rocks to get the tiger that upset. Now all the animals may lose their homes. The brothers won't stop lying until they hurt ALL the animals.

89 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 AM MST on Fri., Jan. 18, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
The zoo has done their part as best as they can. The "recommended height" of the wall is not "required height" . And I am sure the zoo is safe for years for a reason: they do good job. The brothers are really shameful and disgusting. And their family hire such a famous lawyer because they know it's gonna be a tough case unless they spent money on it. Money can't buy life back. Money can't make your drug and alcohol abuse fade away. Money can't cover our common sense and punish all the SFers who love the zoo and the animal. This family is just making me puke.

114 agree | 67 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:47 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

AL said:
It is the fault of the zoo for having inadequate facilities and people in charge should be punished. It is also the fault of these brothers that they provoked the tiger to attack, therefore they should not be given any compensation and should also be PUNISHED. The real victim here was the tiger.

102 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
Now just what is wrong with tiger taunting on Christmas Day? If santa brings you some slingshots and a bottle of vodka, PARTY!

97 agree | 71 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:53 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

fido said:
geez! all did was ponder the finer dining points of this debacle - my post was removed and I didn't even eat anybody! WWHD?

98 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:45 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
So the victims drink and take drugs. SF Mayor also drinks and takes drugs. What's the difference here?

89 agree | 91 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:20 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
Dennis Herrara and the City Attorney's office are excellent. They will absolve the City and the citizens from having to pay for the behavior of three degenerates. These three represent everything that is wrong with society and mankind - it's unfortunate a rare tiger had to die for this.

112 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:45 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
What part of "strict liability" don't Singer and Herrera get? What's the deal with public dollars going to smear a member of the public for mistakes made by public officials on the public's time? Mollinedo is a hack of the rich people who buy their way onto the Zoo board. There is no way that Kamala Harris would prosecute a functionary of her patrons, no way that Herrera would take any steps other than to blame the victims in this case, which is truly sickening.

72 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:36 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
This guy Singer is just a paid liar for the zoo. The investigation is not turning towards the Dhaliwal brothers at all. The zoo, the city and Mr. Mouthpiece Singer are all covering for Mollinedo. Mollinedo is as guilty for Carlos Sousa's death as a speeding driver is for the death of someone he kills by way of vehicular homicide. Mollinedo deserves jail time for operating an unsafe zoo. Mollinedo is headed for a cell in San Quinten.

85 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:30 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
The zoo and the city attorney continue to stir up public sentiment with unsubstantiated claims against the brothers and Carlos Sousa. The city attorney has no evidence that points to anything except multiple failures by the zoo and its administration with respect to their responsibilities to protect the public. And what exactly does it take to provoke a wild tiger to attack a human being? For that answer, just ask the former zoo employee who had her arm partially torn off by the same animal, as she was feeding it! And what does the zoo and director Mollinedo have to say about that case? Wake up Bay Area half-wits, the same as happened to Sousa and the brothers could happen to you at that zoo. The zoo is the problem!

87 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:49 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Examiner Reader said:
All of you a missing the point. These two idiots are now trying for a payday for their own stupidity...This is about 2 animal abuser, drunk and drug user who caused their friend and tiger's death. Where is a common sense and their responsiblity? Innocent victim is the tiger here. Yes, I agree on failure by the zoo to immediately admit SFPD and shoot to kill the tiger.

93 agree | 64 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:21 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Evidence in mauling victims' car points to alcohol, drug use"

Carl said:
"points" to alcohol and drug use. Thanks sf examiner. now we know. I was so unclear. You have certainly cleared up my confusion. maybe the court will help? maybe?

88 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:19 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Mauling survivors face prior misdemeanor charges"

Examiner Reader said:
why would u check their immigration status? do i smell racism?

100 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:32 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Police search tiger mauling victims' cell phones, car"

JCSFNY said:
I thinkk the only "bad seeds" here are the brothers. They seem to have a history of problems with the law. 'They' should have been put away in a facility a few years ago.

120 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:47 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 15, 2008 re: "Mauling survivors face prior charges"

Yak Boy said:
Check the brothers' immigration status while you're at it.

84 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:27 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 15, 2008 re: "Mauling survivors face prior charges"

Examiner Reader said:
the tiger should be exumed and prosecuted for not finishing the job.

104 agree | 75 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:07 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008 re: "Geragos says S.F. Zoo knew of dangers"

DownWithALF said:
Also, the enclosure is clearly deficient. From rocks at edge of moat, a tiger can leap and grab overhanging tree branches, or claw its way up the cracks in the concrete wall. The tiger tasted human blood before when it attacked a zoo keeper Dec 22, 2006, nearly resulting in an arm amputation. Should have been put down or sent to a sanctuary at that time, a bad seed.

83 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:38 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008 re: "Geragos says S.F. Zoo knew of dangers"

DownWithALF said:
Failure by the zoo to immediately admit SFPD and shoot to kill suggests a weighing of life of tiger vs lives of humans. If found to be true, for shame. Any embedded ALF / similar types at zoo must be removed and if need be, prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Yes, zoo animals lives are important but not as important as humans lives. Oh how non politically correct - I call 'em like I see 'em.

93 agree | 120 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree