
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Several crosswalks and curb ramps near Nationals Park are not in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, creating potentially dangerous situations for pedestrians in an increasingly busy corridor, a cyclist group claims.
The obstacles are prevalent along M Street, outside the new U.S. Department of Transportation headquarters, and around the stadium, said Eric Gilliland, executive director of the Washington Area Bicyclists Association.
An inspection of the area Friday found security bollards blocking curb ramps, bus shelters with virtually no sidewalk access,
and multispace parking meters inaccessible to people in wheelchairs.
Also, several crosswalks at non-signalized intersections feed into curbs with no access ramp, Gilliland said. In a letter to the D.C. Council, he said the crossings “present a significant hazard to the mobility and visually impaired.”
“It is clear … that ADA,
which has provided guidance on roadway design for almost three decades, was ignored,” Gilliland wrote.
Pedestrian and bicycle safety is a “top priority” and all new crosswalks and ramps should meet ADA standards, said Karyn LeBlanc, spokeswoman with the D.C. Department of Transportation. DDOT, she said, is working with its federal counterparts to address compliance issues on U.S.-owned property, notably the land around the DOT headquarters.
The crossing in front of the M Street Starbucks, which feeds into a solid curb, is not meant to be used anymore, LeBlanc said, as a new ADA compliant crosswalk is only a “few yards away.”
“We will send crews down to the site to remove the remainder of the markings,” she said in an e-mail.
LeBlanc said DDOT’s ADA coordinator will follow up with the federal government to address the issue of blocked curb ramps. Eve Hill, director of D.C.’s Department of Disability Rights, said her staff will visit the site this week to look for other issues that must be addressed.
“The focus has been on the stadium,” said Ward 6 D.C. Councilman Tommy Wells, who represents the ballpark district. “We need to look around the stadium to make sure there’s [disabled] access from the Metro and other areas.”
mneibauer@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
2:18 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008 re: "No easy access near ballpark for disabled"
Report as inappropriate
11:32 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 15, 2008
re: "Shuttle service, beer sales among issues still to work out before Opening Day"
Report as inappropriate
11:34 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
8:58 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
7:47 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
7:06 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
6:23 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008
re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"
Report as inappropriate
9:01 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007
re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"
Report as inappropriate
4:10 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007
re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"
Report as inappropriate
12:17 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007
re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"
Report as inappropriate
5:46 AM MST on Tue., May. 22, 2007
re: "Deal should clear the way for stadium art"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Now how did "progressive, caring" DC happen to forget about the Americans with Disabilities Act which requires that public facility projects consider access for the disabled?
6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"The most extreme example might be June 29, when United faces off against David Beckham and the L.A. Galaxy as 12:30 p.m., and the Nationals play the Baltimore Orioles an hour later." well that was some brilliant scheduling there....lets stuff 100,000 people into the area over a two hour span
6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Considering where the new stadium is, you can bet that the cost of security will skyrocket!!!
6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If DC knew that they couldn't afford to pay the police department they shouldn't have never opened up the Stadium. You have so many poor people living in the DC area and all the taxes we citizens have to pay could have been going into better use. we have to pay all this money and we are not going to see where the money is going. Who cares, right.
7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
Re:$2M owed for security at Nats games -- Since the "quasi-governmental" D.C. Sports and Entertainment Commission won't pay the $2 million it owes the Metropolitan Police Department for security at Nats games, why not get those "quasi" Commission members and paid staff out directing traffic on game days? At $55 an hour, it should only take them 36,364 person-hours to work off their debt.
8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Whether the [commission] is paying it or MPD is paying it, it comes out of the same pot,” Mayor Adrian Fenty’s spokeswoman Carrie Brooks said in a statement. WHAT? Good grief, no wonder the city is in so much trouble. Everyone is aware the budget process means nothing in D.C., and that is why money is misspent and missing everywhere, but to come out an officially admit it, wow - good work Brooks.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The city charges baseball $55.00 per hour, the officers are paid their regular hourly rate. For most officers that about $32.00 per hour. What is the city doing with the difference?
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
miqcie: Art is good. The DC government should make sure that it is part of the environment throughout our city, and encourage the community cultural groups and gifted DC artists who create it. The stadium is private property, owned by the Lerner family, who can well afford to buy their own art.
290 agree | 314 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
miqcie said:
I'm hopeful that this funding will be restored and is appropriate use of financing for public art. As a denizen of this city, I'd don't mind a part of my tax dollars going to projects like this that are truly community goods.
322 agree | 294 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
The Commission claimed the site-specific art for the private baseball stadium was just being "loaned" to the stadium but still owned by the commission. That is like saying your dental work is on loan from someone else. Public art projects like this are normally paid for by the developer, and the public arts agency gives technical assistance in the project's execution. This poor judgment by the Commission has cost the DC arts community $850,000 in much-needed capital funds.
349 agree | 295 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
Update: The deal is now for a $206,000+ site-specific sculpture to be "loaned" to the stadium by the DC Arts Commission. That is like saying that you "borrow" your dental work, an obvious falsehood. Shame.
354 agree | 348 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree