Examiner.com // 14 mins ago
KTLA.com // 19 mins ago
KTLA.com // 22 mins ago
ABC7.com // 53 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 14 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 14 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 21 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 47 mins ago
Examiner.com // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 4 hrs ago
 
   
Council spends thousands on event trips, conferences
Article History
There are updates to this article.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Howard Council members spent thousands of dollars to attend events and conferences in their first year in office — expenses members say are necessary to demonstrate their political support to the community.

“It’s important as elected officials to be at these events,” said Council Chairwoman Courtney Watson, D-District 1.

“It’s also important to remember these are taxpayer dollars we are using and use them wisely,” said Councilwoman Mary Kay Sigaty, D-District 4.

From a library gala to a ball benefiting the Arc of Howard County to the Maryland Association of Counties conference, seminars and meetings have cost council members $6,796 since July 1, 2007.

The five council members have spent $11,537 on vehicle mileage, meals and lodging, and seminars and meetings so far in fiscal 2008, according to expense records obtained by The Examiner.

In fiscal 2007, council members spent $15,426.

Councilman Calvin Ball, D-District 2, was an incumbent, so his expenses covered the entire fiscal year, while the remaining four members took office in December 2006, halfway through the fiscal year.

These expenses could drop off a bit, as the members become more familiar with the organizations and topics. For example, not all members are likely to attend all upcoming Maryland Association of Counties conferences, Watson said.

The County Council budgeted $10,000 for vehicle expenses, $10,000 for meals and lodging, and $17,000 for meetings and seminars in fiscal 2008, council administrator Sheila Tolliver said.

In fiscal 2007, the council budgeted $8,000 for vehicle expenses, $10,000 for meals and lodging, and $10,000 for meetings and seminars, she added.

The amounts for mileage and meetings are higher in fiscal 2008 to reflect rising gas and event ticket prices.

The council usually doesn’t spent as much as is budgeted, and the allotted amount includes other non-council expenses, such as those for assistants and the cost of food for monthly meetings, Tolliver said.

Often council members coordinate events and have one or two members represent the council, particularly as members are juggling jobs and families, said Ball.

“For the vast majority of our community, they want us to go out and show we care and respect the good work they are doing,” he said.

As the sole Republican on the council, Councilman Greg Fox, R-District 5, said he felt compelled to attend as many events “as I reasonably can.”

Fox’s expenses for mileage are also higher, since his district includes the entire western part of the county.

“Being the only Republican and a large district and the largest number of constituents, it all adds up,” Fox said.

But, he added, “it’s all minor [expenses].”

Councilwoman Jen Terrasa, D-District 3, could not be reached for comment.

smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

6:27 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 3, 2008 re: "Council eyes budget cuts in face of possible deficit"

Examiner Reader said:
How can Ken Ulman and the county council spend our money on wasteful positions and recycling bins when our schools and county government buildings are literally falling apart. One day he celebrates the fact that we have a surplus and now he crying poor mouth. If you want a perfect example of corrupt leadership look no further then our own local politicians. Quote from Ken Ulman: "The citizens who live here are willing to support the higher costs associated with the level and quality of police and fire services, as well as public schools" I understand we need public safety but he should not use our public safety servants as a deflection to warrant higher taxes and his inability to manage a county budget.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:18 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 3, 2008 re: "Council eyes budget cuts in face of possible deficit"

Examiner Reader said:
Cost of Living increase??? The Howard County employees do not receive cost of living increases. That is why most of them live in neighboring jurisdictions. Those increases were scale adjustments not COLA's or connected to CPI, ECI or any other index. They were scale adjustments. That is Ken Ulman's own words. Ken Ulman and the county council view the general workforce as the red headed step child and view the Police and Fire department as a highly skilled and qualified workforce of Howard County. The Fire and Police Dept.'s do not require college degrees but their starting pay is higher than most professional entry level county positions which do require 4 year degrees. If you want to cut a bloated budget how about cutting back on the Fire and Police Departments 5% and 6% increases. Either that how about cutting back on Ken Ulman's wasteful positions he has created for his friends. Ulman and the people who run HoCo are incompetent and a joke!!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:55 AM MST on Wed., May. 28, 2008 re: "Council eyes budget cuts in face of possible deficit"

Examiner Reader said:
Jim Robey was bad enough but Ken Ulman has taken the cake when it comes to spending. Until the voters of Howard County wake up and do the right thing at the polls, it will only get worse. In the meantime, Councilwoman Cochran and Councilman Fox, keep up the good work.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:03 AM MST on Wed., May. 28, 2008 re: "Howard Council wants more information on staffing"

Examiner Reader said:
So Kenny got caught gaming the system. Hey, how else does a goverment school graduate and functional illerate get a good goverment job if not from his friends?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:36 PM MST on Tue., May. 27, 2008 re: "Council eyes budget cuts in face of possible deficit"

Examiner Reader said:
Way to go Ulman. Way to squander the County surplus on sweetheart deals to campaign contributors! This guy does not deserve a second term.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:49 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008 re: "Council eyes budget cuts in face of possible deficit"

Examiner Reader said:
Budgetcuts! Has economy reality finally trumped Ulman's spending spree? Wonderful!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:51 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "Budget includes new staff for several departments"

Examiner Reader said:
Ulman says times are tough, so let's "only" hire 43 more employees. This guy is out of touch. Maybe we should elect someone with some executive experience, instead of his 10 jobs over 10 years.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:49 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "Council members question trash fee hike"

Examiner Reader said:
Another crappy decision by Ulman. I wish our party would nominate someone talented instead of this guy.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:13 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Council members question trash fee hike"

Examiner Reader said:
Another reason to get rid of Kenny. I pay $5K in property taxes and the HC government can't pay for trask pick-up without a $175.00 surcharge that they now want to raise 29%! These political hacks need to be kicked out of office.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:12 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Budget includes new staff for several departments"

Examiner Reader said:
How does firing 15 people and creating new positions save money amongst Ulman's continuing spending? And I seem to recycle just fine without it being mandatory to own a bin.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:42 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Council members question trash fee hike"

Examiner Reader said:
This notion of forcing residents to own recycling bins by raising fees is ridiculous. It doesn't make any sense. And just how can Ulman call this a tight budget when he funds close to 200 new positions, gives raises, and provides health care? Then why the urgency of firing 15 people? As with the recycling bins, Ulman is using the budget to fund his personal agenda and to support his friends he hired into county positions.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:31 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008 re: "Council spends thousands on event trips, conferences"

Examiner Reader said:
"...necessary to demonstrate their political support to the community..." This will be even harder to achieve with no GTV, which was recently abolished by our self-obsessed county executive, Ken Ulman.

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:30 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008 re: "Council member questions environmental job qualifications"

Examiner Reader said:
if we are going to question anyone's qualifications, we should start with ulman. at least feldmark doesn't claim to have all sorts of experience he doesn't. now ulman on the other hand. what a fraud that guy is.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:58 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 27, 2008 re: "Council member questions environmental job qualifications"

Examiner Reader said:
Sigaty only lost to Ulman (by less than 50 votes, BTW) because Ulman claimed he was "Secretary of the Cabinet" and a "Clinton White House Staffer" and "Director, Board of Public Works" and Ulman's daddy helped him buy his way into office. Ulman is a joke who deserves to be replaced. Good for you - Mary Kay! Maybe you or some other qualified Democrat will run against Ulman, because Ulman just appoints his high school chums and gives his donors sweetheart real estate lease deals.

18 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:57 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 27, 2008 re: "Council member questions environmental job qualifications"

Examiner Reader said:
Ken Ulman has become a bad joke in this county. No matter who we talk to, the next election can not come fast enough. He'll be back practicing law and again ripping off his clients very soon. Better days are coming folks.

16 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:49 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 27, 2008 re: "Council member questions environmental job qualifications"

Examiner Reader said:
This is an opportunity for Sigaty to eliminate usless an political office that will cost HC taxpayers and have no environmental impact from a scientific perspective. HC doesn't have this position now and doesn't need it in the future. Ulman is a green fool.

12 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:04 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Council outlines broadcast needs"

Examiner Reader said:
Odd, only after cutting Gtv does the council outline their broadcast needs. You don't know what you have until it's gone! And what exactly will be saved by this cut? Ulman speaks of studio cost when it's housed in a building the government already owns. And equipment costs? About half that of the new positions created when he took office. Perhaps the floor of that building in Oakland Mills he wants to purchase will be used to staff a new government station with his friends and campaign contributors.

28 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:11 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Council outlines broadcast needs"

Examiner Reader said:
There will still be no direct county employee responsible for covering HC government. How can the government hold HCC employees responsible for taping their meetings? They don't receive a paycheck from the government, and what happens when a meeting doesn't get covered? Will the Executive and Council deny funds to the college as punishment?

17 agree | 19 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:43 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Council outlines broadcast needs"

Examiner Reader said:
Make up your minds!! Ulman cuts GTV to save money. Then the council wants additional coverage that GTV is... or was, capable of. Then, hiring new positions may be necessary? After just laying off the GTV staff? Come on Ulman! What poor planning and foresight is this?? It seems to be a complete mystery what "savings" will occur, and that you and the council were never on the same page in regards to television coverage needs. Doesn't sound very efficient to me, though neither does personal, around the clock police transportation, renovating just your offices on the third floor of the Howard building, buying hybrid cars for county fleets in which the upfront cost outweighs the savings, hiring new positions not needed in your so-called "cabinet", and planning to pay for a health plan in a year where he is warned about his spending and a possible deficit. Give me a break! Brace yourself voters, we are only one year into this administration!

29 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.17 seconds)