Multimedia News

BCS Championship Game
6 photos
Florida's Dustin Doe kisses the championship ...
Carrie Underwood at People's Choice
6 photos
Singer Carrie Underwood arrives at the 35th A...
Hot celebs at the People's Choice Awards
6 photos
Jewel arrives at the 35th Annual People's Cho...
Women sports gallery
6 photos
France's Alize Cornet reacts after taking a p...
Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...

Parents, students upset about public high school assignments

Mar 10, 2008 4:00 AM (305 days ago) by Beth Winegarner, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Left, Emilio Wise shows off his letter. Proud dad Mike Wise, right.
(Mike Koozman/Special to The Examiner)
Left, Emilio Wise shows off his letter. Proud dad Mike Wise, right.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The post office delivered more than letters and bills last weekend: It delivered hope and relief for some local parents, and frustration for many others whose children did not gain admittance into the public schools they wanted.

Amy Graff, who launched the SF K Files blog (http://thesfkfiles.blogspot.com/) to chronicle her process of choosing a kindergarten, learned that her daughter didn’t get into any of the seven schools she picked — instead, she is assigned to Junipero Serra, a school Graff hadn’t heard of before Saturday.

When she posted about her results, her blog was flooded with more than 200 comments from similarly frustrated parents.

“They say they try to place you as close to your neighborhood as possible,” said David Wang.

This story continues below
Advertisement

His daughter, entering ninth grade this fall, was assigned to International Studies Academy across the city from their home in the Sunset, rather than any of the four high schools they picked.

“Right now she’s so depressed, she won’t talk to anybody,” he said.

Roughly 13,250 parents applied to San Francisco Unified School District’s lottery system this year — 308 more than in 2007, according to data released last Friday. As a result, the competition was even fiercer: 82 percent was assigned one of their kindergarten picks, compared with 87 percent last year.

One reason for the boost in competition may be that local public schools have better reputations than they used to, said parent Caroline Grannan. “The number of schools middle-class parents find acceptable has increased so much,” she said.

However, more good choices doesn’t necessarily mean happy parents.

“We requested seven schools and didn’t get any of them,” said San Francisco resident N. Gilman, whose daughter is entering kindergarten.

The weekend mail didn’t bring bad news for everyone. Michael Wise’s son picked four high schools, including high-ranking Lowell and School of the Arts, and was accepted to both.

“He hasn’t said which one he’ll pick yet,” Wise said.

Both of Elaine Wong’s twins hoped to attend Lowell, but only one had the grades and test scores to make it. The other will attend Sacred Heart, but “is very upset — he really wants to go to Lowell.”

Many parents who weren’t assigned any of their top choices said they plan to appeal the decisions.

bwinegarner@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

1:38 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 18, 2008 re: "Parents of truant kids hauled to court"

valerie said:
My daughter is a chronic asthmatic and suffering from deep depression because of the death of her sister. We are going through truant court now. The school should be more concerned with making help and education available to the families that have childrene with disabilities. I just got online today and printed the 504 disabilities act and I will take that before the judge when we go back again in which he set her to come back again 4 weeks later. I work a full time job and am on the line for missing for taking her to the doctor now I will probably get fired for missing for going to court so much. Where in the heck is the protection for the families. Money is the main concern to all schools. They could care less about what your child is dealing with! Why are the schools not placing children with disabilities on the 504 plan?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:22 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "Parents of truant kids hauled to court"

Homeschooler_of_3 said:
The schools suck but the districts don't care. They just want captives to keep the $ flowing. We only spend a fraction of the $ PS demands. We use <1/3 of the time schools require. Our kids are FAR ahead of their PS peer group. Our kids receive *real* educations. No PS social pathologies, indoctrination, ritilin, co-ed football, dumbed down subjects, bureaucratic forms, etc. If you have kids in PS, I strongly advise that you get them out yesterday. You have no idea how badly your kids are being miseducated. A grades in US PS must be no better than C's in other countries. Abolish public ed & repeal all truancy laws!

17 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:18 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "Parents of truant kids hauled to court"

Republicae said:
There is a very vicious circle that takes place at all levels of government because power begets more power. Bureaucrats on every level will do whatever they can to exert and in most cases extend their power. Eventually, every powerful government agency, no matter whether it is on the local, state or federal level, will always become a tool for those who are in power or who can influence those in power. Look at just about every level of government and you will find that they have large, sometimes huge staffs, well paid and the recipients of wonderful benefits, yet they are also the most wasteful because they don’t earn the money they spend, they use other people’s money, our money and they don’t give a damn how they spend it. Those in government, on every level, will ensure their own job security by continually expanding their “legal” scope or reach into the lives of the People. The must propagate themselves through intruding into the everyday affairs and the private lives of the Peopl

10 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:51 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "Parents of truant kids hauled to court"

C. Rakish Spagaletto said:
The purpose of government is to protect liberty. Government was never granted the power by the people to use force on parents who choose not to take their children to government indoctrination camps. This government does not represent the people. The Declaration tells us what our duty is when government becomes destructive of these ends.

14 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:19 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "Parents of truant kids hauled to court"

Laissez-Faire Liberal said:
The government has absolutely no right to enslave human beings against their will and force them to attend a so-called "school" that is actually an indoctrination facility that indoctrinates them in pro-government propaganda. America needs to return to its roots of freedom and stop treating so-called 'children' as less than human. All individuals are born with certain inalienable rights, among them the rights to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness (however, there is no such thing as a "right" to happiness). There is no such thing as a "right" to "free" compulsory 'education' in a government school paid for with stolen money (better known by the euphemism "taxes"). This is an outrage. Does The Lord Thy GOVERNMENT have no shame? Apparently, the Jim Crow Laws weren't entirely repealed in the 1960s, as there are still artificial categories of people who are discriminated against by segregationist pseudo-laws.

11 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:50 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "Parents of truant kids hauled to court"

Anarcho_Capital said:
Well said Republicae. Parents should start focusing on pulling their kids out of the brainwashing of the fascist school systems. Punishments for "truancy?" This is nothing more than a policy of harassing those who would rather homeschool their kids. The State's power lies in its legitimacy as an idea in the minds of the people, it cannot survive without this. As a result, the only way to amp up their power is to indoctrinate the youth to obey their authoritarian ways or face State punishment. This generally involves courts, fines, jail time, abuse from police, etc., and a complete lack of teaching on the principles of liberty. More than anything else, this policy assumes that the State has ownership of the children, and is specifically there to break down the family. The State wants its slaves to obey government, NOT the family. What better way to force children to never learn who they are or their American traditions, and to abandon all common sense.

11 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:32 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "Parents of truant kids hauled to court"

Republicae said:
Coercion is the favorite tool of The State, no matter what form it takes, even when it is suppose to be for the protection of the Rights of others is and can never be a correct stance by government. The people of this country now find themselves coerced in just about every conceivable way; we are fined, taxed, licensed, feed, levied and restrained by government, all levels of government. While I think it is important for every child to get an education, I must wonder what price we are willing to pay to protect the rights of The State over the Rights of the People. The government has proven, time and time again, that it is not equipped to be either the "social worker or the policeman" of the world, much less this country. It usually fails more times than it is successful, perhaps one day we will get tired of the meddling of government in our lives and retake the halls of power.

11 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:17 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "Parents of truant kids hauled to court"

Examiner Reader said:
Government Owns Your Children Posted by Lew Rockwell at June 15, 2008 01:01 PM Parents, if you don't force your children to submit to the daily pro-government indoctrination in the government skools, you will be arrested in the land of the free (or is that flea?).

14 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "Parents of truant kids hauled to court"

Examiner Reader said:
Hello there San Francisco Examiner Let's start by giving the correct story.Mr Pomar has been in his son's life for some time now,Mrs Brown has been going though alot of stuff.At the present time Mr Pomar has been trying to be a bigger part of his son's life,his son does not live with him at the moment,he also has'nt had his name on any documents for school,etc for anybody to call him to let Mr Pomar to know what his son was doing or going though,he now has a team of helpers to provied assistences.it's odd to go to court and get called on truanty's i tought the other day when all of us sat down to deal with this it was a done deal or a start,now the news paper is printing wrong info on a parent,try not to have ratings here is one man standing up for himself,not putting down the woman,but Dam!how can you place a man on a hit list when he's getting what he wanted from day one.If you are dealing with parents get those who are 100% wrong and not just to prove a piont! Manny M

9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:28 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Teenager killed in shooting near Bayview school"

Examiner Reader said:
This area is not the Bayview . Who cares where it is. SF needs to wake up and help its young people. This act is proof that it is not happening in the home. City hall is fine when this happens in the "bayview" they want to take the "bayview" from the black people and make this whole city white! Who cares that a kid from this area was shot as long as the kids at S.I. and S.H. and the prep high school in Pac Hieghts are fine, City hall is fine. WaKe up SF! I need the real San Franciscans to charge of this city. Not some hair gel geek from Marin!

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:03 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 2, 2008 re: "Should schools be too cool for pools?"

Marty W said:
Every person should know how to swim. Keep the requirement for swimming. For those who come to high school unable to swim, swimming should be taught as a Phys Ed course, so rent a pool.

4 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:00 AM MST on Wed., May. 28, 2008 re: "Parents, students upset about public high school assignments"

Examiner Reader said:
Move out of San Francisco. In the suburbs, your child can virtually go to any school of your choosing, plus the teachers seem to care a lot more. Having kids take the bus to go crosstown for elementary school is one of the stupiest things anybody could ever think of. Busing has been around since the 70's, and it's just a waste of money. But of course, they can get more money by hitting you up in the form of bonds and property taxes.

7 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:59 AM MST on Tue., May. 13, 2008 re: "First-grader caught with gun at school"

L. Amiot said:
This incident says parents are irresponsible in teaching children about firearms. Or, consider this: the parents are just stupid people who mated and had a stupid child. The gun control freaks will treat this article like a gift from their diety and bang their drums for more laws for GUN CONTROL. As if that will stop irresponsibity, stupidity, or apathetic criminal behavior.

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:58 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008 re: "Sunset parents shine light on school assignment issue"

Examiner Reader said:
To Hell with diversity. A kid should walk to school in the first six years, ride the bus or walk for the next three years and travel across town by bus to finish off High School. Anything else is foolish.

10 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:07 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 8, 2008 re: "Lunch-line ID cards sweeping The City"

Examiner Reader said:
cant the City use the million or so for that weelchair ramp to pay for lunch for hungry school kids? or does the alioto family triumph over common sense again ?

13 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:51 PM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008 re: "Parents, students cross their fingers, hoping to get into school of choice"

Examiner Reader said:
As the parent of a fifth grader awaiting the NEWS about middle school I am haunted by memories of my first two tries at getting an elementary school... I am so stressed out and I can't wait for that stupid letter to come so I can plan the next 3 years of my child's life...sigh...

12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:58 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008 re: "Pink slips approved for school district employees"

Examiner Reader said:
If SF is in such dire financial crisis that hundreds of teachers are being laid off, then why are Ammiano and Newsom launching a million-dollar campaign to post billboards reminding illegal aliens of all the freebies they can get?

42 agree | 42 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement