Examiners cover the alleged sale of Obama's Senate seat by the Illinois governor.

Los Angeles Examiners

Julian Wilson
LA Race and Ethnicity Examiner
Most Recent Article
Another pastor problem?
Hunter Stiebel
LA Political Examiner
Most Recent Article
He hasn't checked his stocks in months!
 
 

Multimedia News

BCS Championship Game
6 photos
Florida's Dustin Doe kisses the championship ...
Carrie Underwood at People's Choice
6 photos
Singer Carrie Underwood arrives at the 35th A...
Hot celebs at the People's Choice Awards
6 photos
Jewel arrives at the 35th Annual People's Cho...
Women sports gallery
6 photos
France's Alize Cornet reacts after taking a p...
Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...

State revenue projections lowered by $333 million

Mar 7, 2008 12:00 AM (308 days ago) by Len Lazarick, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: Annapolis
Annapolis (Map, News) - As expected, the Board of Revenue Estimates said Thursday that state coffers will collect $333 million less in the next 18 months than it predicted as recently as December, forcing similar cuts in spending growth that a Senate committee will finalize tomorrow.

“The economic situation has declined,” said David Roose, director of revenue estimates. “Now many respected economists believe a recession is imminent.”

While income tax withholding collections are up 6.6 percent, “the sales tax is actually showing the effect of the weakness of the economy,” Roose said. Only estate taxes are showing significant increases.

For the first time in 17 years, sales tax collections actually have declined two months in a row.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“The hard numbers speak for themselves,” said Comptroller Peter Franchot, who chairs the revenue board. “We have yet to experience the full force and effect of the national economic downswing.

“It’s going to get worse before it gets better,” Franchot added.

In its official letter to Gov. Martin O’Malley laying out the revenue numbers he is required to use in balancing the state budget, the board noted that economists believe the recession will be likely “shallow and short.”

State Treasurer Nancy Kopp noted that “we’re not in the free-fall situation” the state experienced in the severe recession of 1990 and 1991.

The lowered revenue projections have “clear implications for the state,” said O’Malley’s Budget Secretary T. Eloise Foster. There is enough of a planned “fund balance” or surplus for fiscal 2008, which ends June 30, to cover the $75 million revenue decline this year, Foster said. But for next year, “we’re short of where we need to be.”

She noted that Senate budget subcommittees already had cut $100 million, but she hoped to work with the Senate and House to “preserve some of the administration’s priorities.”

Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller said that “the governor’s programs are going to remain intact,” but will likely be scaled back from his proposed spending plans.

“We’ll leave increments,” Miller said, such as a portion of the proposed $50 million Chesapeake Bay 2010 Trust Fund the Senate tentatively approved Wednesday.

llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

8:23 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Franchot wrangles over, eventually approves O’Malley’s $75 million in proposed budget cuts"

Workin Stiff said:
Peter Franchot is our only hope in keeping Owe'Malley's over spending with taxpayer money in check. Franchot has stated that state budgets have been trimmed back to bare bones -- now start cutting into the bone. No more tax or fee increases, the taxpayer cant afford it!!

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

9:35 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008 re: "Franchot wrangles over, eventually approves O’Malley’s $75 million in proposed budget cuts"

Examiner Reader said:
True. It really is not news when a politician claims to oppose something, yet votes for it anyway. Too often, the motivation for lodging opposition is to get media credit, not to actually impact the outcome.

7 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:42 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008 re: "Franchot wrangles over, eventually approves O’Malley’s $75 million in proposed budget cuts"

Examiner Reader said:
This tactic is called "kissing up to the boss" when the chips are down or actually it is called kissing the bosses butt! Pathetic leadership in Maryland is a gross understatement.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:40 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "O’Malley proposing $50 million in cuts as state eyes $214M extra for child care"

Examiner Reader said:
When are we in this state going to learn that incompetent baltimore leaders are not the ideal persons to run the whole state! We need a major streamlining of government, and that means less services, less layers of management, and low enough taxes, especially upon small business to encourage a stronger tax base to begin with, As to the per child cost of care for these children, try these three letters: BID.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:35 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008 re: "O’Malley proposing $50 million in cuts as state eyes $214M extra for child care"

Examiner Reader said:
Don't worry folks. This is just more OweMalley, Miller & Busch bookkeeping magic! They are just trying to do what they want to do in spite of the fact the money/revenue is not there even after the largest tax increase in our history. GO TEAM OWE, GO!

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:38 PM MST on Mon., Mar. 24, 2008 re: "House tentatively OKs budget, rejects GOP cuts"

Examiner Reader said:
I did not vote for O'Malley I live in the city and saw how he was destroying it. I be dam if I would vote the idiot to ruin the whole state. I voted for Bob E. My dad always said Maryland is a corrupt Democratic State and will continue to be until the people wise up and vote other wise. Get the house in order and cut taxes , how much will the people take until there is another revolution. Lets have a boston tea party but we will call it the Baltimore Crap Party and throw them all in the annapolis harbor . Oh darn that's right we will have to load them down with rocks as crap floats. haha

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 23, 2008 re: "Md. House OKs budget, spending database"

Mike Brown said:
Gee, let's do the math. There is $1.3 billion in new spending, and $1.3 billion in new taxes. I thought these liberal jackasses said there was a budget deficet? Seems it was only a new spending deficet. Hey Democrats, when are you going to wise up and vote for responsible legislators? Oh, I forgot, most of you work for the government in one fashion or another and see their ever growing government as job security. I view you as nothing less then welfare queens. You feed from the teet of the taxpayers.

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:43 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 22, 2008 re: "Md. House OKs budget, spending database"

AMERICA CALLING said:
its time for the people of md to get some of these people out of state goverment think when you vote dont listen to lies we had a good governor what do we have now and for the look at the house and the senate spend spend your money for once think people

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:00 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 21, 2008 re: "Md. House OKs budget, spending database"

Examiner Reader said:
Taxing lawyers when many politicians ae lawyers will not happen.This is in fact a good region to tax lawyer services do to the high density . Lawyers will say that we are taxing peoples right to a fair trial and this would be unconstitutional. It would be met with stiff legal recourse and this time any judge would side with the lawyers as opposed to the republican challenge. Democrats are known for taxing the people who can not defend themselves against liberal taxing for their benefit.Righteous are they not. Pennsylvania with twice the population spens less on government employment and does a better job.Go figure. I hope everyone who voted for omalley suffers long and hard.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:33 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 13, 2008 re: "Budget battle draws sparks and threats of tuition hikes"

Examiner Reader said:
An alternative way to come up with $200 million is an Attorney Services Tax. Better we cripple the lawyers than the computer geeks.

3 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:57 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008 re: "State revenue projections lowered by $333 million"

P. Ackerman, Columbia said:
Last year, during spring break, I rented a mini-van at a Los Angeles airport for a little over $300 per week. Renting the same type of van, this spring break, at BWI would have cost over $500 per week! $140 of it was taxes and fees! Guess what? I decided not to rent the van. This means Maryland gets ZERO tax money. Excessive taxation and fees is why the state is lowering revenue projections. Instead of buying (or renting), people will do without or go to another state to purchase goods.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008 re: "State revenue projections lowered by $333 million"

P. Ackerman, Columbia said:
Tax Maryland’s Politicians Maryland’s politicians are not feeling the pain of the legislature's recent tax increases. Political contributions remain untaxed even though “Tech Firms” are subject to the state's 6% sales tax. Political contributions should be taxed at the greater of the sales tax plus 1% or the income tax rate plus 1%. The most recent campaign for Governor would have generated $70 million alone. Taxing political contributions will encourage the legislature to keep taxes down (Maybe even cut them?), and will balance the $200 million the state will lose when "Tech Firms" move out.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:32 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008 re: "State revenue projections lowered by $333 million"

Examiner Reader said:
Come on people...the economy is suffering because of 2 reasons; (1)the War in Iraq and (2) the Republicans being in office. But, I do not want to see another 9-11 occuring in our great nation. Mayor O'Malley is not the problem, give him time to perform his job before condeming his way of doing things during this "economical downfall."

3 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:07 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008 re: "Senators cut spending"

Austin Foreman said:
I can't believe our governor would put $345,000 of tax payers hard earned money for a program to encourage employees to report to work on a regular and dependable basis. At my job if you are dependable and report to work on time you get a pay check. If you don't you get fired. Thanks for trying to reward dead beats.

8 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:51 AM MST on Fri., Jan. 18, 2008 re: "The truth behind budget numbers"

Examiner Reader said:
The numbers do not lie, however people do! They will eventually kill themselves off. Trust only in GOD's will. Numbers can save our good name.

62 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:32 AM MST on Fri., Jan. 18, 2008 re: "The truth behind budget numbers"

Examiner reader said:
Former Gov. Robert Ehrlich is now former Gov. Robert Ehrlich because his budget rose 9.5 percent. Former Gov. Robert Ehrlich is now former Gov. Robert Ehrlich because his budget rose 9.5 percent. Conservative Republican voters stayed home rather than support such nonsense. Maryland government is out of control on both sides of the aisle. A taxpayer revolution that changes the State Constitution is now the only way out.

59 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:37 AM MST on Fri., Jan. 18, 2008 re: "Nonprofits could be hit hard by tight state budget"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree about the non-profits...take a look at the House of Ruth and the salaries of the executive director and other administrative salaries. House of Ruth is the biggest scam out there. It's outrageous that they rake in all that money and do NOTHING for victims of domestic violence. They 'warehouse' people, nothing else.

54 agree | 62 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:34 AM MST on Fri., Jan. 18, 2008 re: "The truth behind budget numbers"

Examiner Reader said:
Ehrlich left office with a SURPLUS. Hel-LO! Maryland voted into office a locust, a destroyer, who desolates anything he comes in contact with. Take a look at Baltimore. Did that destroyer make a pact with the devil to get into office? WHO voted him in???

51 agree | 54 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:37 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008 re: "Nonprofits could be hit hard by tight state budget"

Examiner Reader said:
The state should tax these problem enabling so-called non-profits that continue to profit their top execs!

56 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:45 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008 re: "Nonprofits could be hit hard by tight state budget"

examiner reader said:
Hummmm our former Gov The Honerable Robert Erlich never made these kind of cuts and still did not raise taxes. What is the drunk driving teflon lepreCON doing with the State money. Could it be trips to kiss hillarys large butt what a joke he is.

66 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:26 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008 re: "Nonprofits could be hit hard by tight state budget"

Examiner Reader said:
Maybe the state needs to start taxing BG&E for its operations in MD. Since they bank in Deleware, MD doesn't tax them; or is it because they contribute so heavily to political campaigns and lobby extravagantly?

76 agree | 54 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement