Council adopts sick leave bill
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - All D.C. businesses will be required to provide paid sick leave under legislation unanimously approved Tuesday by the D.C. Council.

The District follows only San Francisco in guaranteeing sick leave for about 200,000 workers who have none, though the D.C. bill goes further by allowing leave for recovery from domestic violence or sexual abuse.

Jaime Contreras, director of Local 32BJ of the Service Employees International Union, described the step as “bold and important.”

Under the measure, businesses with 100 or more employees must provide seven sick days annually, those with 25 to 99 employees five days and those with 24 or fewer employees three.

“Government has often stepped up when it appears that workers are being taken advantage of,” said at-large Councilwoman Carol Schwartz, who steered the controversial bill through the council.

The legislation was watered down as seven council members banded together to back a half-dozen changes proposed by the D.C. Chamber of Commerce. Lobbying behind the scenes was furious.

Among the amendments: Employees must be on the job a year before earning paid sick time; businesses may apply for an economic hardship waiver; employer penalties will be capped at $1,000 per calendar year; and health care workers and waitstaff, those who work for minimum wage and tips, were pulled from the bill.

Barbara Lang, president of the D.C. Chamber of Commerce, said the law equates to a 3 percent “employment tax.” The council’s amendments “mitigated some of that risk,” she said, though this is still not the time “to burden the business community and make us less competitive with Maryland and Virginia.”

Mayor Adrian Fenty will sign the bill, a spokeswoman said.

mneibauer@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

6:42 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Councilman stalls streetcar plans in Anacostia"

will streetcars help or harm? said:
Don't we need to know about the streets the streetcars will be in? Streetcars work in places like Portland, OR, when they have a dedicated area in the middle of a street so that they don't block traffic. But if they have to use the street, they will likely increase congestion, not reduce it. This should be the start of the questioning -- not just ridership, but what happens to traffic speeds. If Graham discovers that there are issues with this streetcar, he should look at the other streetcar plans as well.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:31 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Big name donors support GOP D.C. Council candidate"

What said:
Where is Carol doing her job from Rohoboth? She is not only losing Republican support, she is also losing all support.

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:43 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Council weighs taxing free employee parking"

Examiner Reader said:
Oh, well. Nobody will come to DC anymore. Especially since Graham parks his own car for free. "Do as I say, not as I do."

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:11 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "Council to carve up big pot of money"

Homnoir: said:
Oh well, The Cary Silveman campaign may be seeing it's due demise. Silverman & all 10 of his constituents -Ray(We're-Here-We're....) Milefsky, Martin Moulton, Richard (Act-Up) Rogers, Si (I-demand-Shotspotter-now)Kailian, Alex (Bring-me-a-memo) Padro, Kevin (Uncle-Ruckus)Chappelle, Brian (I-demand-an-answer-this-minute-Councilman) Smith and their partners & significant others can take the message that the Shaw/Mt. Vernon/Convention Center/Chinatown community do not find their message(s) are the most viable for the aformentioned communities, as a whole. It's call inclusiveness not colonization by way of gay economic elitism.

6 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:36 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008 re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"

Examiner Reader said:
In any large business, there are incompetent workers. However, there are still many competent workers in D.C. government & a "brain drain" is possible! Most of the problems & perception of bad service are due to ill-prepared managers; managers that should never have been placed in such positions & certainly not allowed to continue as managers. D.C., unfortunately, has an ineffective, inefficient, inadequate method of selecting, training, maintaining & validating its office/program managers. In most instances, required supervisory (MSS)training is a joke and focuses mostly on fluff. A crew is only as good as its captain. If the captain is ethically challenged, unable or unwilling to perform, unfair, and/or a bully to subordinates-the public should expect poor performance and/or service. Yet, even under such challenges, many D.C. workers try to do their work. Their cries for help are routinely ignored & they have become easy whipping posts for what ails DC. Request my name be anonymous.

11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:55 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008 re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"

Examiner Reader said:
Could you do a follow-up to determine how, and when, employees will be notified as to whether they have been guaranteed to receive the incentive payment. Employees would like to put in their official papers if they knew they would definitely receive the incentive. For instance, does it matter when one actually leaves the rolls? How much notice will employees receive that they have been found eligible? The applicaiton to retire, open through Friday, March 7, 2008, is an intent to retire and allows an employee to withdraw their intent. As a matter of fact, could you see whether or not the city is going to have a special fund during FY 2009 to pay these incentives? If Gandhi is saying there is a fiscal problem looming, how does that fit in? Also, will employees receive a lump sum incentive payment or payouts throughout 2009? Will those identified for the incentive payment be based on actual quality of services provided based on the last evaluation? Request my name be anonymous.

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:44 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008 re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"

Examiner Reader said:
Councilwoman Carol Schwartz is in error. There would be no "brain drain" from the ranks of the D.C. Government because of the fact that the majority of the D.C. employees have little or no brains to begin with. Frankly, if they want to do the taxpayers a favor what they should do is fire what they have and recruit from the outside. Then their problems would be solved.

9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:19 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 15, 2007 re: "Council to carve up big pot of money"

What about the taxpayers? said:
Those of use who pay through the nose in property taxes should get a little relief. How about a partial refund?

112 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)