California News

Businesses targeted for ‘litter’ fee

Mar 4, 2008 3:00 AM (179 days ago) by Joshua Sabatini, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Trash is strewn in front of a McDonald’s in the Potrero neighborhood. A proposed fine would charge businesses to aid in cleanup efforts, similar to a tax levied by Oakland.
(Cindy Chew/The Examiner)
Trash is strewn in front of a McDonald’s in the Potrero neighborhood. A proposed fine would charge businesses to aid in cleanup efforts, similar to a tax levied by Oakland.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Those San Francisco businesses oft-blamed for the litter in the streets — the food wrappers, drink cups, bags and napkins — could be forced by The City to pay an annual fee to help fund cleanup efforts.

Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval told The Examiner on Monday that he will introduce legislation today that would impose a fee on fast-food businesses, convenience markets and gasoline-station markets. The money would go into a city Excess Litter Fee Fund and pay to clean up the streets and sidewalks.

San Francisco would not be the first major city to impose such a fee. Oakland adopted a similar fee in February 2006 with a sliding scale ranging from small businesses having to pay $230 annually to large businesses paying $3,815 annually.

The legislation does not set a specific fee amount but says it would be a sliding scale based on gross receipts of a business. He said “a couple million dollars a year” in the fund would be needed to “make a difference.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

“A large part of the litter problem we have is due to the wrappers and the disposable canisters that are produced by fast-food restaurants,” Sandoval said. “Right now, the taxpayer is picking the tab up for picking up this mess.”

The proposal is expected to draw opposition from the business community, which has long complained that City Hall is overburdening them with fees.

Last year, a city commission audit on litter found 100 sites inspected had, on average, 36 pieces of various types of litter. At the time, it prompted Mayor Gavin Newsom to call on fast-food restaurants to do more to curb littering, but he said he would look unfavorably at the idea of a litter fee.

Newsom’s spokesman Nathan Ballard said Monday that Newsom and other officials “met recently with the owners of fast-food restaurants and coffee shops” to have them increase efforts to reduce litter in city streetscapes.

“We’re in the process of finalizing which restaurants are going to step up to the plate and do their fair share to ensure that The City remains on track to meet its litter reduction goals,” he said.

Sandoval said the cost of the litter cleanup should fall to the “businesses and the people that patronize them. They are the ones who rightly should be paying for this mess.”

Sandoval said he is working to have the board approve the legislation within 90 days.

The litter “not only impacts the tourist economy, but it just degrades everyone’s daily quality of life,” he said. “We got to find some way of turning this around.”

jsabatini@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

4:06 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008 re: "Businesses targeted for ‘litter’ fee"

reader said:
How about enforcing the littering laws in the first place? Everyday, I see the fine folks who live in public housing throwing their trash right out their front doors, throwing trash over their shoulders while eating, dumping the trash from their cars on the street. Bums leaving trash, jackasses at red lights opening their doors and dumping trash, TL drug dealers throwing fast food wrappers and chip bags all over the place. Dipshets on MUNI dumping out their backpacks,etc,etc.. This city is really turning into a cess pool.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:59 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008 re: "Businesses targeted for ‘litter’ fee"

Examiner Reader said:
Removing a lot of street corner trash cans was a bad mistake. What do one expect when people care more about graffiti tagging walls and causing damage in this city rather than putting trash in the garbage cans?

4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:44 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008 re: "Businesses targeted for ‘litter’ fee"

Examiner Reader said:
The fee can added to the price of their product so that only the users and sellers pay for it. As a tax payer that doesn't use the product I shouldn't have to pay to clean up after it.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:42 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008 re: "Businesses targeted for ‘litter’ fee"

turtle head said:
Why don't any of these crazy schemes ever involve citizens of the city? Who buys that crap and throws it in the street? How is what these people do after they leave the business the fault of the business itself? Why can't leftists think?

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:49 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008 re: "Businesses targeted for ‘litter’ fee"

Examiner Reader said:
He should consider penalizing the business who put their leaflettes on cars or hand them out at BART stations. These things getted tossed out all over the city. Check out the cars around a nightclub on any given weekend night and you will understand.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:09 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008 re: "Businesses targeted for ‘litter’ fee"

Examiner Reader said:
Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval wans to stick his nose into citywide issues again! After his attempt to deal with off-sale liquor licenses, you would think he would have learned his lesson.

21 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement