Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 10 mins ago
Examiner.com // 1 hr 39 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 7 mins ago
Examiner.com // 2 hrs 45 mins ago
ABC7.com // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
 
   
Aging Hall of Justice bursting at the seams
Article History
There are updates to this article.
The Hall of Justice, constructed in 1958 and expanded in 1979 and 1985, houses the Superior Court, two jails holding about 800 inmates, police headquarters, a police station and the District Attorney’s Office.
(Mike Koozmin/Special to The Examiner)
The Hall of Justice, constructed in 1958 and expanded in 1979 and 1985, houses the Superior Court, two jails holding about 800 inmates, police headquarters, a police station and the District Attorney’s Office.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - An $800 million overhaul of San Francisco’s aging Hall of Justice will most likely take a backseat in The City’s 10-year capital plan, city officials said, prompting worries that there simply will not be enough courtrooms to deal with a growing criminal caseload.

City officials are not only complaining that the facility is seismically hazardous, but that there isn’t enough room to try an increase of criminal cases.

And while an increase in arrests and prosecutions may seem like a step in the right direction for a city concerned with violent crime, it may be all for naught if The City’s aging justice center is too small to accommodate them, Superior Court Presiding Judge David Ballati said.

Compared with February 2007, there are now hundreds more felony and misdemeanor cases both pending and set for trial, Ballati said. In February 2007, there were 421 felony cases scheduled compared to 697 now.

The increase could lead to “big trouble” when a defendant asserts his right to a quick and speedy trial, Ballati said.

At any hearing, a defendant with a pending case can call for a trial within 60 days, and with almost 800 additional felony and misdemeanor cases pending over last year, that could lead to some scheduling nightmares.

The Hall of Justice, constructed in 1958 and expanded in 1979 and 1985, houses the Superior Court, two jails holding about 800 inmates, police headquarters, a police station and the District Attorney’s Office. Renovation plans have been floated since the 1980s.

Department of Public Works Director Edward Reiskin said a recent study puts the building’s capacity at the straining point. But with other city capital projects such as parks and schools given a higher priority, Reiskin said, finding the money for the Hall of Justice overhaul may be tough.

“They just don’t weigh as high on the sexy scale,” Reiskin said. For the time being, Ballati said, he’s tried to bring in judges from the Civic Center Courthouse to deal with the added caseload. Unfortunately, he said, there’s no place for them to preside.

“It’s like going to a hotel and they tell you there are no more rooms,” he said. The Hall of Justice project is scheduled to undergo an environmental impact study before a bond measure goes before the voters. At the earliest, a bond measure would end up on the ballot in 2011. If approved, a new justice headquarters wouldn’t be completed until 2019 at the latest.

bbegin@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

4:42 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 21, 2008 re: "Men charged with rape in San Mateo assault"

Examiner Reader said:
this guy... ramirez... surprisingly was my coworker... i met him once but it was a complete surprise to all of us. We did not expect this... I guess you cant always judge a book by its cover.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:44 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "Case against mayor's cousin seems to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, I've seen those foreclosure documents and this guy is the poster child for everything that went wrong in the great American mortgage meltdown. He's a mortgage broker himself (or was) so really has no one to blame. Funny thing too.........the notice of sale doesn't show up on the SF public records search but one exists. Another bail out from the cuz.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:58 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "Case against mayor's cousin seems to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
I understand that this guy has been in court more than most judges. Check the public record regarding his current mortgage in default. Even though he runs a mortgage business from his home. Check how many times he has been in small claims court. Check his police record. Ask his neighbors about him. Check to see if he has a drug arrest record. Ask the police at the Marina District Station about him. You've just scratched the surface. Every family has a black sheep and this guy is the Newsom version. No one else could get away with the things this guy gets away with.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:11 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Case against mayor's cousin seems to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
We have to discount that city employee's opinion since they all "took the test and then they rest"(City employees work ethic). The City employees are the least productive and overpaid group of people I know. you will note that he responded to this during working hours on the City payroll... However, no one should be given special treatment.

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:49 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "Case against mayor's cousin seems to vanish"

Bill Dikant said:
This person must have a close relationship with the Infamous Patrick Kennedy, he who took "Ambien".These yahooz have more excuses than the Brothers Grimm.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:35 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008 re: "Case against mayor's cousin seems to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
What else,would you expect, I been working for the city for 23 years and seen alot of this. Newsom is no different he has all that Getty money backing him. If this were anyone of us smallguys, what do you think would have happened?

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:13 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008 re: "Case against mayor's cousin seems to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
When it comes to legal problems it apparently works to one's advantage if related to Mayor Newsom? Like this should be noted as "surprising" behavior for this mayor?

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:11 PM MST on Sat., May. 31, 2008 re: "Child traumatized, lawsuit says"

Examiner Reader said:
In the past, this child has always been anti-social, cried, killed an animal, displayed signs of mental illness along with his mother for years. This is nothing new for this one.If you only knew. The mother is nuts. The apple doesn't fall from the tree. He needs help and has for several years. This is no surprise with his threats. They will show up in his future years from past behaviors.Two sides to story.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:06 PM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Ex-officer offered deal in alleged scam case"

Examiner Reader said:
Makes you wonder what else have these men have robbed.. The teenager was probally cond by these men. The courts should really look into them and see what else they can find if they did it to this store there must be much more. Don't you think so?

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:51 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008 re: "Ex-officer offered deal in alleged scam case"

Examiner Reader said:
What about the people sitting in prison now that might be innocent?

8 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:35 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 8, 2008 re: "Ex-officer offered deal in alleged scam case"

Rachel Hernandez said:
One thing about dishonest people. They are eventually caught. In this case, the corrupt cop was discovered along with his criminal friends. What do they say? Birds of a feather flock together. Criminals hang out with criminals... they are easy to spot.

2 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:16 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008 re: "Woman going to prison for embezzling $1.4 million"

Examiner Reader said:
I wonder if all that stuff from her shopping sprees and whatnot was really worth it to her now? I don't think she can take it with her to Federal Prison. And who the heck is going to hire this woman once she is released? How on earth is she ever going to pay back the money plus restitution? It's amazing what some people think they can get away with. I think that someone (perhaps a generous designer) should donate the most hideous garb they can possibly come up with and she should be required to wear the clothing/outfits the entire time she is in prison.

10 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:29 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008 re: "Woman going to prison for embezzling $1.4 million"

Examiner Reader said:
Sorry Sister, Louis Vuitton does not make prison garb. What a skank!

7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:22 PM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Examiner Reader said:
You cannot turn in a criminal if you set up your sting and say I'm calling you out. What a farce! If you think he did something wrong, you go through the proper channels. If anyone with an ounce of common sense believes that, I have a bridge for sale too. Yee, Mak, Gruel, Jew should all share the same jail cell.

26 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:07 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008 re: "Run over girlfriend, get two-year term"

Examiner Reader said:
My son gets stabbed thru the heart in ssf his attacker gets 13 months my son will never be the same , This person got more time.Must of had a horrible lawyer .The lawyer should of taken the judge golfing she would of ended up with a few hours behind bars.There is no justice in San Mateo

34 agree | 41 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:56 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Examiner Reader said:
Lawyers don't commit the crimes - criminals commit the crimes. Without criminals there would be no lawyers.

65 agree | 29 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:35 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Examiner Reader said:
Our parents used to suggest to their children to "be a lawyer." Everyone we knew was saying the same thing. Now, I took an informal poll the other day and asked if sentiments were the same for our children and grandchildren. "NO!" was the answer. Interesting, isn't it? The sleazy have overwhelmed the occupation so much that nobody has any respect for them any more. They're viewed as liars and troublemakers out for ego and money.

42 agree | 43 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:17 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Examiner Reader said:
Yee tuned in a criminal to the authorities - why blame him? Why not blame the criminal? Ed Jew commited the crimes, not Yee. Jew's gonna look real cute in that orange jumpsuit.

43 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:12 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Examiner Reader said:
Jew's attorney is grasping at straws. No one made Jew take the dirty money except Jew himself, (and maybe his greedy wife). Gruel was brought in to clean up his mess, and now he's trying to blame the guy who helped him the most. First Fazio, then Gruel. Next he'll turn on Hanlon because he refuses to accept responsibility for his crimes.

43 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:11 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Barton said:
wow, and to think i trusted yee and mak to be standup folks. no more.

47 agree | 37 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:59 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Seven said:
I don't put anything past Yee and Mak. We don't need or want Chinatown corruption in the sleepy Sunset. At least Carmen Chu seems uncorrupted. Chu is exactly what District 4 needed to heal from the Jew mess. It's one of the few things I thank Newsom for doing.

52 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:43 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Examiner Reader said:
To blame everyone but yourself is the American way. That's why Ledger died because it is the fault of the industry. That's why we can all do bad things. It is not our fault, it is someone else.

42 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:23 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Examiner Reader said:
justice is seeing mak, yee, gruel (who should be de-barred) trade their clothes for prison clothes. mak you lost the supe race...get OVER it! yee and gruel...payback is going to be a bxxch for you both!

61 agree | 39 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:13 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Lawyer says Ed Jew victim of conspiracy"

Examiner Reader said:
Why does Ed Jew blame everyone else but himself?

43 agree | 42 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:43 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 7, 2008 re: "City is stuck with bill for legal fees"

L. Amiot said:
Justice must be sought at any and all costs. Justice is not abitrary, but is based on facts and rules of law. If it costs tax money to get justice for Sgt. John V. Young, and the rest of us in San Francisco, consider that a good investment in the safety of our city. Why would anyone complain that it costs money to prosecute murderers?

52 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:20 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 7, 2008 re: "City is stuck with bill for legal fees"

Examiner Reader said:
This was one of the worst crimes in SF history. It was simply a cold blooded murder of a good police sergeant. It was premeditated in that the perpetrators were going to kill anyone who was there. I've always thought that it was related to the ambush of Officer Richard Radetich which occured around the same time. That stated, there must be a trial and the defendants must have attorneys so pay their attorneys and get on with it. The "conflict of interest" aspect interests me: are some innocent?

50 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:07 AM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Mistrial declared in 18-year-old cold case"

Examiner Reader said:
Hope you have kids you don't watch after. Go drop them off in the neighborhood, let's see what happens.

101 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:09 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 27, 2007 re: "Mistrial declared in 18-year-old cold case"

Examiner Reader said:
Nice to know that Kiddies can get away with Murder and victims families won't get any justice. Justice??? WHAT'S THAT?????

93 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.17 seconds)