CHANGE MY LOCATION
Columbia leaders want more info on easements
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Columbia leaders want to know if they got a fair deal when they gave developers the right to use association-owned land.
The Columbia Association board of directors may demand staff to outline how many easements have been granted for the use of CA-owned land, the amount paid for the easement and the assessed value of the land.
“There’s no discussion occurring at the higher level taking into context the impact the easement is having on CA, on residents, and on the community,” said board member Michael Cornell.
The request, which the board will vote on this week, comes on the heels of an attorney general opinion that the Columbia Association violated its own charter when it allowed the president to grant developers the right to use land.
The CA’s charter states the organization can’t donate or sell property or assets unless the board passes a resolution, and the Attorney General’s Office determined an easement qualified as an asset.
CA granted WCI Communities Inc. the right to use a strip of land along Little Patuxent Parkway for a landscaped entrance to the planned — and highly contentious — Plaza Residences building.
“There are equity issues here. [WCI would get] hundreds of millions of dollars off this project, and the CA got $10,000,” Cornell said.
Another easement in River Hill led to mounting woes over trees cut down to make way for a new development, Cornell said. There was no discussion on the development’s impact or negotiations with the developer, he said.
The board will also decide whether to hire an outside attorney to advise on the attorney general’s recommendations to either ratify the easements or amend the charter.
The first step, said board member Cynthia Coyle, is to gather information.
“Due diligence requires us to investigate,” she said.
Alex Hekimian, head of the Alliance for a Better Columbia, said the board’s move for more information was “a good start.”
“It’s a serious situation. You can’t just give away land like that,” he said.
smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com
Comments from Examiner Readers
7:22 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007 re: "Residents question CA salaries, bonuses"
Report as inappropriate
12:27 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Most CA officers earn six figures"
Report as inappropriate
12:51 PM MST on Fri., May. 4, 2007
re: "New board chair wants a positive culture"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Sounds like Mr. Hekimian wants Ms. Browns job. Is she making more money than him?
196 agree | 186 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
King said:
Columbia is run by a homeowners association? News to me.....What a stupid decsion to buy a home there....you still pay taxes right? and you pay thiis too? Lovely.
178 agree | 158 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Columbia no longer needs the CA, we've outgrown it. We need a mayor, city and be run like a real city instead of a homeowners association.
191 agree | 185 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree