Baltimore planning board suggests council amend West Covington plan
Article History
This is the latest version.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - The Baltimore City Planning Commission all but shot down the West Covington Urban Renewal Plan Thursday night, but the redevelopment proposal isn’t completely dead as it heads to City Council.

The commission voted against recommending that City Council approve the plan, citing serious concerns with the proposal’s inclusion of an eminent domain clause that would allow the city to acquire by condemnation the sites of three businesses and seven homes in West Covington.

“The development opportunity is superb, the development opportunity must happen, but not this way,” said Planning Commission Chairman Peter Auchincloss.

The commission considered amending the plan, removing the eminent domain aspect while keeping pieces of the plan that dealt with the rezoning of the area and the preservation of Swann Park. But after a long meeting that included more than 2 1/2 hours of discussion on the plan, the commission decided to turn it over to City Council with the suggestion of amending the plan.

City Council members Rochelle “Rikki” Spector, a planning commissioner, and Edward Reisinger, the 10th District representative, both spoke in opposition of the plan as it stands.

“This area is not abandoned,” Spector said. “Everything here is active and tax-producing. I can’t figure out why we’re doing it.”

Reisinger, council vice president, said the plan, which was introduced in December, was moving too fast to be approved.

“We’re just fast-tracking this thing, and we don’t know what’s going to happen,” Reisinger said. “Let’s look at these seven families. Let’s look at these businesses.”

There was talk at the meeting about Under Armour and the Baltimore sports apparel firm’s desire to relocate its corporate headquarters to West Covington. M.J. “Jay” Brodie, president of the Baltimore Development Corp., confirmed the company has eyed the waterfront location and said it will outgrow its current Tide Point location in the next five to six years.

For Under Armour to potentially move in, though, three businesses — Schuster Concrete Co., Allied Waste Services and Atlantic Forest products — and the families of seven homes would have to be relocated.

“We can change trends and have a much better city. That doesn’t make it easy,” Brodie said.

NOTEWORTHY

>> Harris Teeter, a North Carolina grocer chain, appears to be close to coming to the McHenry Row mixed-use project in Locust Point. Artwork shown to the commission dealing with signage for the project included the Harris Teeter name.

>> The commission approved the Gateway South development, the 11-acre mixed-use project south of the stadium complex that will include office and retail space and a sports recreational facility. Cormony Development LLC, Harrison Development LLC and Team 52 Development LLC are working together on the project.

acannarsa@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

10:12 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Baltimore planning board suggests council amend West Covington plan"

former swann park resident said:
i also disagree with the plan,though i could think of better terms to describe it, im not going to take that time, it seems like corporate yuppies taking advantage of a situation which i feel resulted from corporate and possible city cover up, and trying to make money, i can understand cleaning the park and building more homes and jobs there for the greater good, but i have concerns the project could remove the two block separation the neighborhood has, which has caused something i enjoy calling an oasis effect which i feel that "Swann Parkers" should keep since they took advantage of a legit opportunity. I'm not against building new homes or advancement, i feel that effort should be made to keep the ideals of swann park there.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:43 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008 re: "Baltimore planning board suggests council amend West Covington plan"

Examiner Reader said:
I disapprove of this plan.

41 agree | 33 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)