Comcast monopoly may face challenges
Article History
There are updates to this article.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Months after its first attempt to gain a franchise agreement in Baltimore City faltered, cable company Cavalier seems ready take another shot at breaking up Comcast’s monopoly.

It might not be alone, as city officials and a company spokesperson said Verizon will eventually seek a franchise in Baltimore.

The city’s planning commission earlier this month approved a Cavalier franchise agreement, again sending it to the council for debate. A contract proposed by the Richmond, Va.-based cable, telephone and Internet provider died last fall after a council subcommittee gave the contract an unfavorable recommendation and the city’s Board of Estimates did not take it up.

At that time, Verizon officials said they too may try to break into the city market. In an e-mail statement, Verizon spokeswoman Sandy Arnette said the company will “eventually” seek an agreement to bring FiOS to Baltimore once it deploys its fiber optic network, but could not say exactly when that would occur.

“They’re going to get to Baltimore City,” said Marilyn Harris-Davis, Mayor Sheila Dixon’s director of cable and communications. “Baltimore is certainly a viable cable communications area.”

The contract would allow Cavalier to lease and piggyback on existing Verizon transmission lines to provide service.

However, both Harris-Davis and Councilman James Kraft, chair of the judiciary and legislative investigations subcommittee which spiked the agreement, said they have not heard from the company. Kraft said legislation for the agreement has not been reintroduced. Cavalier representatives did not return calls for comment Thursday.

“We didn’t have a lot of information, they gave it with less than 30 days left before the end of our session,” Kraft said. “We’re not saying we don’t want to create a more competitive market, we’re saying we can’t do this within in the timeframe in a reasonable way. Our understanding is that the issue would return.”

In an e-mail, Comcast spokeswoman Alicia Martin defended the company’s market dominance.

“Competition is not new to Comcast,” Martin said. “No other provider is capable of delivering integrated products on the scale that Comcast does today.”

Harris-Davis reiterated concerns about Cavalier’s customer service capabilities, and questioned who would conduct maintenance and repairs on the system.

“Cavalier is a smaller company,” she said. “When you give a franchise [agreement], you’re giving them access to city streets. We want to make sure they’re up to it.”

acahall@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

11:28 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Comcast monopoly may face challenges"

Examiner Reader said:
8:28 Why The money being placed in the hands of the politicians. More competition. No way that is a Republican ideal Democrats are as crooked as the day is long. I know they say they are for the little guy. They are for lining their pockets Dixon has already taken money. Do you think she is the only one.

97 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:26 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Comcast monopoly may face challenges"

Examiner Reader said:
Why can the nearby Counties have more than one cable company? Those residents have a choice. Lets face it, Comcast customer service stinks. Get the politics out of it and lets have another provider in the City. The City always has excuses - look at the Counties. When they say they cant and Comcast is the only one that can provide decent service - sounds like someone is getting something under the table. Wake UP. I want Verizon.

103 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:15 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Comcast monopoly may face challenges"

Paul Tupelo said:
HAHAHA, i love the part in this where the spokeswoman from comcast said that no company can offer what Comcast offers. I know people with Verizons FiOS and let me tell you, they were blown away by it. The pictures are clearer than Camcast HD because its not going through those damn coaxile cables. Besides, the people at comcast always seem nasty when i call them with a complaint or problem. Lets let someone else more qualified have a go at it. I'd pick cavelier or verizon over comcast anyday but then again, i have no options so i'm stuck with it i guess.

95 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:41 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 8, 2008 re: "Montgomery County fines Comcast nearly $13,000 following service complaints against cable giant"

Anthony Grimm said:
It always seems like the bigger the company, the harder you fall. Obivously a company of this size could not be bothered with fines.That's just the cost of doing business. Hiring more employees that follow this same destructive trend of poor customer service is not the answer, either. Cavalier is another service provider in the area and probably a better option. I've beeen using them for some time now and couldn't imagine paying a company to treat me like that. I too, used to complain about their terrible pricing and poor custimer service until I smartened up and switched over to Comcast. Those tpe of problems seem too easy to solve most times.

109 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:46 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007 re: "Comcast to raise cable rates starting Jan. 1"

Examiner Reader said:
The programs freeze everyday in Falls Church what did they spend it on bonuses?

138 agree | 156 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:45 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007 re: "Comcast to raise cable rates starting Jan. 1"

Examiner Reader said:
With the absolute worse service they will raise your rates, and people like Kyle McSlarrow pinp for them The mafia bever had it so good in its heyday Only in the Nation's capital area can people get away with this. The most wealthiest county and no competition? This is what you get being sheeples Prohibition had nothing on the cable providers

166 agree | 178 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:29 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 9, 2007 re: "Fairfax Co. warns about Comcast proposal"

Jordan Fogal said:
Written Testimony Submitted by Jordan Fogal To The Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law “Mandatory Binding Arbitration Agreements: Are They Fair For Consumers?” Tuesday, June 12, 2007, 10:30 a.m. I would like to humbly thank you for your invitation to speak on the subject of defective housing and arbitration clauses. Those two terms have become tantamount. There are a lot of people depending on me today, because I am a writer, to find the right words and to speak for them. I am charged with communicating their frustration, hopelessness, and the abandonment that they feel. They are not here; but I am, for all of them. There are hundreds of thousands of us, and we are in every state. We realize that everyone thinks their issue is the most important; but when an issue, that affects hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of Americans, goes unmentioned, we feel like subjects instead of citizens. Since your invitation, I have realized something about you and

224 agree | 228 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:25 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 9, 2007 re: "Fairfax Co. warns about Comcast proposal"

Jordan Fogal said:
No one will mention the real reasons for foreclosure, like bad builders, substandard construction, or arbitration clauses that protect bad builders and bad lenders. No one mentions we no longer have access to the courts. No one talks about the ridiculous red tape stopping victims and protecting builders: by paid for agencies like the Texas Residential Construction Commission in Texas ... or the other 30 states that are 'right to cure' bureaucratic mazes. The only reason for all the forecloses that is mentioned is subprimes by the stupid people. No, we are not called the stupid people but it is implied. We are for the most part middle class, hard working people, many first time homebuyers, and senior citizens like us. We had a 6% fixed mortgage and we could afford our payments. We just couldn't afford the astronomical repairs to our new Tremont Home/Stature uninhabitable dwelling. There are hundreds of thousands like us. In the great state of Texas, are we going to believe

213 agree | 219 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)