California News

Multimedia News

Best NFL hits
12 photos
Chicago Bears linebacker Lance Briggs (55) sa...
American League baseball highlights
20 photos
Los Angeles Angels third baseman Chone Figgin...
'Body Of Lies' world premiere
11 photos
Actor Leonardo DiCaprio attends the world pre...
Offbeat festivals
10 photos
A devotee of the Chinese Shrine Bang Neow pre...
Pop tarts
12 photos
A model wears a creation by French designer J...

Real estate slump reducing funds for farm preservation

Feb 21, 2008 12:00 AM (228 days ago) by Matthew Santoni, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Harford County’s agricultural-preservation program could be endangered by the declining real estate market because taxes on home sales cover most of the program’s costs, county officials say.

Harford suffered a 50 percent decrease in home sales in January compared with the same month last year, so the 1/2-percent transfer tax on home sales is bringing in less revenue to buy development rights from farmers, said County Councilman Chad Shrodes of north Harford.

“Many people are focused on the decline in prices, but from a county revenue perspective, the more important factor is the slowing of transaction volume,” economist Anirban Basu said.

As more homes sit on the market, counties make less from transfer taxes, he said.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Harford suffered the largest month-over-month decrease in sales volume in the Baltimore region in January, Metropolitan Regional Information Systems Inc. reported.

And revenues from the transfer tax have come in 20 percent to 40 percent lower than expected over the last few years, said Council President Billy Boniface.

“Things were good in the years when the market had a lot of ups,” Shrodes said. “We were bringing more money in than we could spend on preservation for a while. Next year, we may not be able to preserve as much as we have been.”

With the addition of 23 properties to the county preservation program, Boniface said, Harford will have just enough money to keep paying those who have already entered the program.

Expanding it, Boniface said, would require new revenue or new methods of preservation. One way is the transfer of development rights from farmland owners to those who have parcels in already developed areas.

This preserves agricultural land, as farmers give up their rights to develop, and allows denser projects in areas close to existing roads and public utilities.

Shrodes said the slowing real estate market has helped preserve farmland by lowering the demand for farmers to convert their land into housing developments. When combined with increases in the amount the county is willing to pay for development rights, the market is making preservation a more profitable option, he said.

Along with the efforts to transfer development rights, Shrodes said, the county could preserve more land through state programs and allow parts of farms to be divided into smaller, denser pieces while preserving the rest of the land.

“We need to put a few new tools in the box,” Boniface said.

msantoni@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:04 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Maryland farmers squeezed by soaring fuel, fertilizer costs"

Examiner Reader said:
Rising fuel costs. Chineses drilling 85 miles off our coast while we import. No new refinery within 30 years Do not worry Obama has a tax plan to make it all ok.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:03 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Maryland farmers squeezed by soaring fuel, fertilizer costs"

Examiner Reader said:
This is the unfortunate price we pay by thinking and acting that gasoline prices would never change. Wait until winter hits because if it's cold, our prices are going to jump again. It's time to invest in renewable energies, I'd be more than happy to see O'Mally push for these over the new Calvert Cliffs Power Plants. Maybe farmers should be cut a deal to go back to solar and wind power for home and allow more money to be spared for fuel costs.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:08 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Program would shift farmers’ excess water to municipalities"

Examiner Reader said:
Then what happens when the farmer's neighbor's well runs dry?

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:02 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 21, 2008 re: "Harford has state’s only robotic milking machine"

Examiner Reader said:
why does the cow look green?

114 agree | 119 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:03 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 10, 2007 re: "Drought killing corn crop early this year, affecting livestock"

Examiner Reader said:
The cows are out of luck, now that we are using corn for fuel. What a plan. It sounds good during good growing seasons, but what do you do now? We need to stop screwing around with band aids to fix our fuel supply problems and get serious about resources that are proven to work. Nuclear power, new refineries and drilling.

238 agree | 270 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:17 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 re: "Harford has state’s only robotic milking machine"

Examiner Reader said:
I saw my grandfather hand milk cows in a barn with only an oil lantern for light. What's the world coming to!!!

265 agree | 249 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:53 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 re: "Harford has state’s only robotic milking machine"

Examiner Reader said:
Isn't it a little demeaning to refer to beautiful dairy cows as "toddlers" and a magnificent robotic milker as a "toy". The technology blows my mind that a cow can be milked by a robot. Good for the Dallams! Kate makes the BEST ice cream in the world at Broom's Bloom Dairy Store.

265 agree | 279 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:11 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 re: "Harford has state’s only robotic milking machine"

Examiner Reader said:
Very interesting article on the robot. However, cows surely get more than "a pellet" while being milked. One pellet would be about the size of a piece of dogfood and would hardly lure the cows to the robot. I hope the cows get a good portion of pellets dumped in front of them when they enter the robot.

271 agree | 267 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:49 PM MST on Tue., May. 22, 2007 re: "New legislation to help preserve farms and aid the environment"

Examiner Reader said:
That doesn't seem like a lot of milk production. are you missing a few zeros? Tim Feeser Carroll County Commissioners office

538 agree | 261 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:57 AM MST on Thu., May. 3, 2007 re: "Cost of milk leaves gas prices in the dust"

Huh? said:
Doesn't the government subsidize milk? What an economic ripoff of citizens. Produce extra milk, waste lots of it then charge more for the little bit that is left.....amazing!

424 agree | 294 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement