Multimedia News

BCS Championship Game
6 photos
Florida's Dustin Doe kisses the championship ...
Carrie Underwood at People's Choice
6 photos
Singer Carrie Underwood arrives at the 35th A...
Hot celebs at the People's Choice Awards
6 photos
Jewel arrives at the 35th Annual People's Cho...
Women sports gallery
6 photos
France's Alize Cornet reacts after taking a p...
Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...

Residents, officials concerned about Riverdale project plan

Feb 21, 2008 12:00 AM (323 days ago) by Sara Michael, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - A proposed 260-unit development in Columbia would create dangerous traffic conditions near Cedar Lane and damage an environmentally sensitive area, opponents said.

“It shouldn’t be touched,” said Bridget Mugane, president of the Howard County Citizen’s Association, referring to the land at Cedar Lane and Route 32.

Residents and elected officials are opposing the proposed Riverdale project, saying the development is too large for the 29-acre site, and Dale Thompson Builders’ plans for modifying the roads are inadequate.

Developers proposed adding a traffic light for cars exiting westbound on Route 32 onto northbound Cedar Lane, officials said. The double lane of traffic exits now without stopping, and community leaders said a change would lead to hazardous driving conditions.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“Requiring all traffic exiting MD 32 to proceed to a traffic signal, stop and then turn right onto Cedar Lane will likely back vehicles most or all the way up the ramp onto the highway,” wrote Hickory Ridge Village Board Chairman Gregg Schwind in a letter to county planners.

County planners are reviewing the proposal, which was submitted late last year, and making comments and seeking revisions where necessary, said Kim Flowers, deputy director for the Department of Planning and Zoning.

The State Highway Administration also is reviewing the plans as Route 32 is a state road.

“The county and SHA are in agreement that the development access at this intersection is problematic, and that is why the developer’s changes have not been approved,” said county spokesman Kevin Enright.

The project could also cause stormwater management problems and damage the landscape, which rises 40-feet above Cedar Lane and descends to the Middle Patuxent River, Mugane said.

Several members of the Howard delegation also opposed the project.

Del. Elizabeth Bobo, D-District 12B, said she was “very troubled” about the effect on traffic and the environment.

In a letter to County Executive Ken Ulman, Bobo and Sen. Edward Kasemeyer, D-District 12, urged county officials to re-evaluate the developer’s traffic study.

Dale Thompson Builders could not be reached for comment.

smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

11:37 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Columbia residents express concerns about infill proposal"

Lifelong Columbia Resident said:
It is always about the greed. They want to cash in on the older neighborhoods with larger lots. They can build a McMansion on Wilde Lake, or stuff 2-3 homes on a 1/3rd acre lot. It is all about which developer has enough grease for the squeeky wheels in the County Council. I've lived here my entire life and Columbia is turning into a sewer like Baltimore. Our "leaders" are out of touch with reality, they only have special interest in mind when they propose legislation. This not the Columbia vision we bought into in 1968, the elitists are running the show now. And public transportation is the last thing Columbia needs, we have enough problems without importing more. If people can't afford a car what can they buy at the Mall? Look at Owings Mills after the subway went in. Why don't the folks in the county council figure out how to curb crime? Or find productive things for our children to do instead of doing drugs and having babies. Stop filling your pocket with kickbacks and do your j

1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:57 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
I used to work for Howard Co., and believe me, the current bus routes aren't full by any means. Therefore, I don't believe there is a need for more public transportation, especially in a town with affluent residents who commute. But I'm sure Ulman would love to funnel money into this anyway.

6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:12 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Funding unclear for Columbia downtown public transit plans"

Examiner Reader said:
Public transportation will not make Columbia Mall (downtown is a joke) more attractive. It will destroy the mall, just look up the road in Reisterstown. If GGP and Wells believe it is needed they are free to reach into their pockets to pay for it. They are not welcome to reach into mine.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 27, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
My vision for Columbia involves a qualified County Executive. Maybe one day Howard County will make that dream come true.

62 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:41 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 12, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
Ulman said he was going to block the tower in Columbia during his campaign. Then, he gets elected and does nothing. I can't trust this guy. His vision for Columbia likely panders to everyone, like he did to get elected.

54 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement