Boone to the system
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - His brother and his father were already with the Nationals. After two years away from the game, Bret Boone decided he was not ready to give up on baseball after all and joined them.

Washington signed Boone to a non-guaranteed minor-league contract on Monday. The 38-year-old second baseman hasn’t played since the end of the 2005 season. He retired during spring training with the Mets in 2006. The Nats signed younger brother Aaron Boone as a back-up corner infielder during the offseason. Their father, former major leaguer Bob Boone, is an assistant general manager with the club and its vice president of player development.

“There’s something still in there,” Bret Boone said on Monday at Nats spring training in Viera, Fla. “I look at it as I’ve got nothing to lose.”

Bret Boone played 14 seasons for five different organizations and was named to three All-Star teams. He also won four Gold Gloves and two Silver Slugger awards and ranks third all-time in home runs by a second baseman (252).

His path to a starting second baseman’s job is a difficult one, however. Both Ronnie Belliard and Felipe Lopez are established Nats competing for that spot in spring training. But Belliard and first baseman Dmitri Young signed a similar non-guaranteed minor-league contract with the team last winter, with Young eventually earning National League Comeback Player of the Year honors.

The Associated Press contributed to this report


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

8:46 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 18, 2008 re: "Council considers raising taxes on Nationals tickets"

Examiner Reader said:
Not paying the rent? Kick them out! They are a losing team anyway.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:18 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008 re: "No easy access near ballpark for disabled"

Examiner Reader said:
Now how did "progressive, caring" DC happen to forget about the Americans with Disabilities Act which requires that public facility projects consider access for the disabled?

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:32 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 15, 2008 re: "Shuttle service, beer sales among issues still to work out before Opening Day"

Examiner Reader said:
"The most extreme example might be June 29, when United faces off against David Beckham and the L.A. Galaxy as 12:30 p.m., and the Nationals play the Baltimore Orioles an hour later." well that was some brilliant scheduling there....lets stuff 100,000 people into the area over a two hour span

7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:34 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Examiner Reader said:
Considering where the new stadium is, you can bet that the cost of security will skyrocket!!!

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:58 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Examiner Reader said:
If DC knew that they couldn't afford to pay the police department they shouldn't have never opened up the Stadium. You have so many poor people living in the DC area and all the taxes we citizens have to pay could have been going into better use. we have to pay all this money and we are not going to see where the money is going. Who cares, right.

8 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:47 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Mike Licht said:
Re:$2M owed for security at Nats games -- Since the "quasi-governmental" D.C. Sports and Entertainment Commission won't pay the $2 million it owes the Metropolitan Police Department for security at Nats games, why not get those "quasi" Commission members and paid staff out directing traffic on game days? At $55 an hour, it should only take them 36,364 person-hours to work off their debt.

9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:06 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Examiner Reader said:
"Whether the [commission] is paying it or MPD is paying it, it comes out of the same pot,” Mayor Adrian Fenty’s spokeswoman Carrie Brooks said in a statement. WHAT? Good grief, no wonder the city is in so much trouble. Everyone is aware the budget process means nothing in D.C., and that is why money is misspent and missing everywhere, but to come out an officially admit it, wow - good work Brooks.

8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:23 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Examiner Reader said:
The city charges baseball $55.00 per hour, the officers are paid their regular hourly rate. For most officers that about $32.00 per hour. What is the city doing with the difference?

8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:01 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"

Mike Licht said:
miqcie: Art is good. The DC government should make sure that it is part of the environment throughout our city, and encourage the community cultural groups and gifted DC artists who create it. The stadium is private property, owned by the Lerner family, who can well afford to buy their own art.

292 agree | 315 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:10 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"

miqcie said:
I'm hopeful that this funding will be restored and is appropriate use of financing for public art. As a denizen of this city, I'd don't mind a part of my tax dollars going to projects like this that are truly community goods.

323 agree | 295 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:17 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"

Mike Licht said:
The Commission claimed the site-specific art for the private baseball stadium was just being "loaned" to the stadium but still owned by the commission. That is like saying your dental work is on loan from someone else. Public art projects like this are normally paid for by the developer, and the public arts agency gives technical assistance in the project's execution. This poor judgment by the Commission has cost the DC arts community $850,000 in much-needed capital funds.

351 agree | 296 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:46 AM MST on Tue., May. 22, 2007 re: "Deal should clear the way for stadium art"

Mike Licht said:
Update: The deal is now for a $206,000+ site-specific sculpture to be "loaned" to the stadium by the DC Arts Commission. That is like saying that you "borrow" your dental work, an obvious falsehood. Shame.

356 agree | 350 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)