Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
On Tuesday, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors will vote on a request for proposals from new providers in anticipation of the contract with American Medical Response West ending June 30, 2009.
But the request contains a controversial clause: the option to privatize ambulance dispatch. All dispatch — from law enforcement to fire to ambulance — is currently handled by the county’s Public Safety Communications dispatch center. But the request for proposals offers providers the option of making an offer to dispatch its own ambulances.
County dispatchers will still interview 911 callers and provide all instructions, but instead of dispatching the ambulance, there would be an electronic transfer of information from the county’s computer-aided dispatch system (CAD) to that of the ambulance company’s, county Emergency Medical Services Administrator Barbara Pletz said.
The benefit of the option is that the provider would take on the $1 million to $4 million cost of replacing the county’s CAD system, which was installed in 1994, San Mateo County Health Department spokeswoman Beverly Thames said. A study done last fall recommended replacing the system, which works well for fire and police dispatch but struggles to keep up with the more complicated ambulance dispatch.
While acknowledging the cost savings, Menlo Park Fire Protection District Chief Harold Schapelhouman said he is fiercely opposed to the idea. Having all dispatch consolidated in one place would reduce the likelihood of calls being dropped or mishandled, he said. Just because the information is transferred by computer does not mean it’s any safer, he said.
“Just like with e-mail, sometimes people send it but you don’t get it. It could be human error, it could be lost in cyberspace,” he said. “The less transfers you make in any kind of an emergency, the better.”
Schapelhouman said that 10 years ago, his department joined a consolidated countywide dispatch system because fire officials were convinced of the benefits of having all dispatch under one roof. The fact that county officials are now considering a partial privatization option has prompted the fire chief to consider breaking with the system, he said.
Supervisor Jerry Hill said he had his own concerns about communication problems and delays and would probably not support the request for proposals as it is currently written.
Hill said the privatization would also result in an estimated five county dispatchers being laid off.



Comments from Examiner Readers
9:28 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 18, 2008 re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
5:52 AM MST on Sun., Aug. 17, 2008
re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
5:21 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 15, 2008
re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
2:44 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 15, 2008
re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
4:35 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 14, 2008
re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
12:45 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 14, 2008
re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
9:31 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 13, 2008
re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
4:47 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 8, 2008
re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
12:46 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 8, 2008
re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 5, 2008
re: "Dress rehearsal for disaster"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Does anyone know of any follow-up stories or photos of this exercise?
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This was right in time for the zombie flash mob that was wandering through the city just after this. I can't begin to imagine what folks must have thought about this.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
btn said:
"Agencies will not know whether the attack is a chemical release, a bomb or some other weapon of mass destruction until it is announced, Tamaldge said." 2nd paragraph of article: "In coordinating a simulated nuclear explosion in The City that Saturday morning..."
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I wonder why I have not heard about this through any other source. Local TV news: talking about bigfoot. SF Gate: talking about bigfoot.
3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Is Saturday, August 16, really considered a weekday?
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Anyone remember the London train bombings and 911 attacks, that the government were 'coincidently' also, in one form or another, preparing for some simulated attack??? I'm getting out of town for this one.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Huh. I live in a condo right in the middle of all this mayhem, and none of the residence have been told of this event. I only know because I happened to see the article in the Examiner lying on a table at my gym. Talk about an inconvenience and possible scare to local residence caught in the middle of what they don't know about. Hopefully none of the elder tenants will suffer any medical problems.
4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
To the last post: I would say that they sufficiently cited their sources. They quote an SFFD lieutenant and and FBI agent and list listed a total of six participating agencies (including SFFD and FBI) that you can contact for verification - if you think this is some kind of complex terrorist trick.
1 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think it would be helpful to San Francisco area residents to site your sources so that we may verify the validity of the dress rehearsal. And while I don't mean to cast doubt, its more so to be sure that if indeed there will be a drill, we can make plans to be as far away as possible.
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a ex emergency medical services provider I always applaud preparedness. In the case of San Francisco however, with the exception of natural disasters,I don't see the point. San Francisco is a city friendly to radical, be the Muslim or other, causes for some time now. Why would terrorists blow up a city that embraces their causes? This is a waste of taxpayer money, but then, aren't most programs in San Francisco? Yep!
8 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree