
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The D.C. Council Tuesday tentatively approved legislation that would guarantee paid sick leave for all workers in the city, rejecting concerns that the measure may cripple small businesses. The bill, which proponents describe as a historic step for about 200,000 workers who receive zero paid sick leave, was approved on first reading by an 11-2 vote. The second reading will come in March.
“When all is said and done, we shouldn’t lose sight of the essential feature of this bill, that all employees should have minimum amounts of sick leave,” said Ward 3 Councilwoman Mary Cheh. “It’s the right thing to do and it gives dignity to our employees.”
But critics said the bill is poorly timed given the weak economy.
“It would be the wrong way to go at a time when our country is heading into recession,” said at-large Councilman Kwame Brown, who ended up voting for the legislation.
The measure as introduced last May guaranteed 10 sick days to all workers. Months of negotiations between the business and workers rights coalitions, brokered by Councilwoman Carol Schwartz, R-at large, spawned a watered-down version that requires companies with 10 or fewer workers to provide three paid sick days, and those with 51 or more workers to provide seven days — with two classes in between.
“It’s obviously not as strong as the bill that was introduced, but it makes sense that there were compromises made in attempt to address the concerns,” said Karen Minatelli, deputy director with the D.C. Employment Justice Center. The business community roundly opposed the final product and pushed the council to shelve the legislation. A move to table it, supported by Mayor Adrian Fenty and Council Chairman Vincent Gray, fell by a 7-6 vote. Businesses, Gray said, have a “legitimate concern” given their “razor-thin line of affordability.”
If the bill passes in March, Fenty would have to decide whether to sign it or veto it. Barbara Lang, president of the D.C. Chamber of Commerce, promised “consequences” for the seven council members “who don’t think the business community counts.” The unions, she said, “had a bigger hold on them.”
mneibauer@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
6:42 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Councilman stalls streetcar plans in Anacostia"
Report as inappropriate
11:31 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008
re: "Big name donors support GOP D.C. Council candidate"
Report as inappropriate
9:43 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008
re: "Council weighs taxing free employee parking"
Report as inappropriate
11:11 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008
re: "Council to carve up big pot of money"
Report as inappropriate
1:36 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008
re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"
Report as inappropriate
12:55 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008
re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"
Report as inappropriate
5:44 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008
re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"
Report as inappropriate
1:19 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 15, 2007
re: "Council to carve up big pot of money"
Report as inappropriate
will streetcars help or harm? said:
Don't we need to know about the streets the streetcars will be in? Streetcars work in places like Portland, OR, when they have a dedicated area in the middle of a street so that they don't block traffic. But if they have to use the street, they will likely increase congestion, not reduce it. This should be the start of the questioning -- not just ridership, but what happens to traffic speeds. If Graham discovers that there are issues with this streetcar, he should look at the other streetcar plans as well.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
What said:
Where is Carol doing her job from Rohoboth? She is not only losing Republican support, she is also losing all support.
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Oh, well. Nobody will come to DC anymore. Especially since Graham parks his own car for free. "Do as I say, not as I do."
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Homnoir: said:
Oh well, The Cary Silveman campaign may be seeing it's due demise. Silverman & all 10 of his constituents -Ray(We're-Here-We're....) Milefsky, Martin Moulton, Richard (Act-Up) Rogers, Si (I-demand-Shotspotter-now)Kailian, Alex (Bring-me-a-memo) Padro, Kevin (Uncle-Ruckus)Chappelle, Brian (I-demand-an-answer-this-minute-Councilman) Smith and their partners & significant others can take the message that the Shaw/Mt. Vernon/Convention Center/Chinatown community do not find their message(s) are the most viable for the aformentioned communities, as a whole. It's call inclusiveness not colonization by way of gay economic elitism.
6 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
In any large business, there are incompetent workers. However, there are still many competent workers in D.C. government & a "brain drain" is possible! Most of the problems & perception of bad service are due to ill-prepared managers; managers that should never have been placed in such positions & certainly not allowed to continue as managers. D.C., unfortunately, has an ineffective, inefficient, inadequate method of selecting, training, maintaining & validating its office/program managers. In most instances, required supervisory (MSS)training is a joke and focuses mostly on fluff. A crew is only as good as its captain. If the captain is ethically challenged, unable or unwilling to perform, unfair, and/or a bully to subordinates-the public should expect poor performance and/or service. Yet, even under such challenges, many D.C. workers try to do their work. Their cries for help are routinely ignored & they have become easy whipping posts for what ails DC. Request my name be anonymous.
11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Could you do a follow-up to determine how, and when, employees will be notified as to whether they have been guaranteed to receive the incentive payment. Employees would like to put in their official papers if they knew they would definitely receive the incentive. For instance, does it matter when one actually leaves the rolls? How much notice will employees receive that they have been found eligible? The applicaiton to retire, open through Friday, March 7, 2008, is an intent to retire and allows an employee to withdraw their intent. As a matter of fact, could you see whether or not the city is going to have a special fund during FY 2009 to pay these incentives? If Gandhi is saying there is a fiscal problem looming, how does that fit in? Also, will employees receive a lump sum incentive payment or payouts throughout 2009? Will those identified for the incentive payment be based on actual quality of services provided based on the last evaluation? Request my name be anonymous.
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Councilwoman Carol Schwartz is in error. There would be no "brain drain" from the ranks of the D.C. Government because of the fact that the majority of the D.C. employees have little or no brains to begin with. Frankly, if they want to do the taxpayers a favor what they should do is fire what they have and recruit from the outside. Then their problems would be solved.
9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
What about the taxpayers? said:
Those of use who pay through the nose in property taxes should get a little relief. How about a partial refund?
112 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree