
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Funding for Doyle Drive isn’t all that San Francisco will lose if state legislation isn’t passed to implement a toll on the seismically unsafe road — federal funds for city programs aimed at improving traffic flow and making parking easier to find will also be withheld.
SFgo, a transit signal priority system in development by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency for years, will miss out on $58 million in federal funding; and SFpark, an MTA-incubated program that explores expedient parking options, will lose $20 million, if legislation regarding the toll isn’t approved by March 31.
In August, the San Francisco region was awarded $158.7 million in federal funding for transportation upgrades through a government grant program. The funding, however, is contingent upon a resolution for the Doyle Drive toll — a fare proposal opposed by many North Bay politicians who believe it will unfairly tax commuters from Marin and Sonoma counties.
“Losing $78 million to make it easier to park and take the bus, while running the risk of catastrophic destruction at Doyle Drive, should have people up in arms,” said Dave Snyder, the transportation policy director at the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association, a public-policy think tank. “All because Marin commuters don't want to pay an extra $1 or $2 toll?”
The SFgo program, aligned with bus rapid transit projects proposed for Geary Boulevard and Van Ness Avenue, would hold signal lights for transit vehicles, helping to improve the flow of traffic, MTA spokeswoman Janis Yuen said.
SFpark would provide information about available parking information spots via cell phone messages, install on-street sensors and accept more forms of payment for meters, Yuen said.
“Without federal funding, only Proposition K funds will support capital improvements,” Yuen said, referring to the 2003 voter-approved measure that allocated a portion of sales tax income to public transportation funding. “It will greatly deplete resources for the next five years.”
Andrew Sullivan, of the citizen advocacy group Rescue Muni, said The City could use congestion-management tactics such as SFgo and SFpark.
“San Francisco transit riders and automobiles will definitely benefit from federal funding for the MTA programs,” Sullivan said. “This is one more reason we should support congestion pricing methods like the Doyle Drive toll.”
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
|
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:02 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "MTA suffers with Doyle Drive toll failure"
Report as inappropriate
2:26 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008
re: "MTA suffers with Doyle Drive toll failure"
Report as inappropriate
1:07 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008
re: "MTA suffers with Doyle Drive toll failure"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe we just close Doyle drive and let them ride Muni from a parking lot at Crissy field. That way then they can save the $2, not have to pay high downtown parking fees and not pollute the City with their huge SUVs and BMW's(Basic Marin Wheels)
65 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Who better to charge tolls than Marin commuters for retrofitting Doyle Drive, which they use? After all, aren't East Bay commuters paying higher tolls to fund the new Bay Bridge eastern span?
78 agree | 64 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Wai Yip Tung said:
Back of the envelop calculation. Let's say Back of the envelope calculation. Let's say a Marin resident bought a BMW for $40,000 and keep it for 10 years. He cross the bridge 200 days a year, driving 25 miles one way. His cars has 25 mpg and gas cost $3.5 a gallon. And he has a monthly parking pass for $200 a month. His annual expense will be: 40000/10 + 200x5 + 200*25*2/25*3.5 + 200*12 = 8800. This does not even include insurance, license fee and maintenance. A $2 toll will add $400 to his annual expense, a mere 4.5% increase. So this BMW driving Marin resident rather drive on a dangerous road than paying $400?
65 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree