Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
The county’s Planning Board approved most of the building’s site development plan Thursday, not including the clock tower, which exceeds the 50-foot height limit.
Developers first need to post a sign at the location notifying the community of a meeting about the building plan, a requirement in the county zoning regulations, board members said.
Wegmans officials said they didn’t think they needed to post the 15-day notice, but will do so and return to the board for approval.
“That’s just an accessory,” said Wegmans project manager Stephen Leaty, referring to the tower.
Most of the newly built stores include a tower, which officials called a “trademark element.” Wegmans has a store in Hunt Valley and also is planning to build in Crofton.
Meanwhile, the traffic study conducted for the site, which was approved by the county’s Department of Planning and Zoning, has been appealed to the hearing examiner.
Opponents to the proposed two-story, 160,000-square-foot Wegmans Food Market at the intersection of Snowden River Parkway and McGaw Road have said the traffic study of the area underestimated the volume of congestion.
The study by Baltimore-based Traffic Group didn’t consider the size of the store and traffic generated on Saturdays, opponents said.
Planning board members determined they didn’t have the authority to delay a decision on the site plan based on the appeal.
But they weren’t without their reservations following residents’ concerns raised at a public hearing in early January.
“We certainly were a forum where people could raise these [traffic] issues,” said Board Chairwoman Tammy CitaraManis, adding county planners will have to defend their traffic study approval during the appeal process.
Leaty said, “It’s hard to say” how the appeals will affect the construction of the building.
“We’ll have to see how it goes.”
smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
4:45 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 18, 2008 re: "Wegmans moves forward in Howard"
Report as inappropriate
1:52 PM MST on Sat., Feb. 2, 2008
re: "Wegmans moves forward in Howard"
Report as inappropriate
8:28 AM MST on Sat., Feb. 2, 2008
re: "Wegmans moves forward in Howard"
Report as inappropriate
6:02 AM MST on Sun., Jan. 6, 2008
re: "Wegmans foes fear traffic"
Report as inappropriate
6:50 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 5, 2008
re: "Wegmans snuffs out smoke sales"
Report as inappropriate
Wegmans Forever said:
8:28 commenter . . . have you ever been to a Wegmans, ever? It isn't just another "grocery store" - it's Traders Joe, Giant, Safeway and Whole Foods all rolled together, with a big heap of great customer service. Please stop holding this up and let the construction move forward. I don't want to have to drive more than a hour in either direction to get to a Wegmans.
51 agree | 67 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wegmans will be great for the area, by forcing the other local chains to improve service, product selection and lower prices. Retail workers will benefit by having one of the top Fortune rated employers in Howard County. The real opposition is from the grocers union, who is behind the appeals. They fear the competition. I am sure that if Wegmans was a union store, you would not hear any complaints about traffic.
84 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Just what we neeed another grocery store. We do not have enough now. Maybe we need another Fast Food also.
64 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
it all depends on how much money is paid to the politicians by whom. of course the county executive and police chief will place red light cameras, speed cameras, seat belt cameras and child safety seat cameras at every entrance and exit. it is all about the children. and the greedy, self-serving, corrupt politicians.
81 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Phil said:
This is an excellent decision. Hopefully other chains will eventually do the same. Maybe a few letter, e-mails or calls to head offices might help convince them.
121 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree