
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Dire budget estimates threaten a health clinic for city employees at San Francisco General Hospital, but an effort is planned to keep it open.
At a hearing held before the Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee on Wednesday, city employees turned out to oppose the closure of the Worker’s Compensation Clinic that, after a Health Commission vote, is scheduled for March 15.
Dr. Mitch Katz, head of the Department of Public Health, said during the hearing that the Health Commission has also adopted a set of principles about budget cuts, including a principle to protect programs for “vulnerable populations, meaning people that have no choice” — programs such as mental health or substance abuse.
Closure would save the department $736,453, according to Public Health documents, and all employees would be reassigned. The clinic is set to stop taking patients Friday.
For the fourth time in three years, the Department of Public Health has recommended the closure of the most popular clinic for The City’s nearly 28,000 employees to go should they be injured on the job. This year the closure was fast-tracked as a result of impending budget cuts threatening programs.
The Department of Public Health is bracing for cuts in state funding that could be as much as $6.8 mil-
lion under Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s current budget proposal. The City is also facing a nearly $230 million budget shortfall, which could affect the department, too.
The Worker’s Compensation Clinic at San Francisco General Hospital is one of nine health clinics that city employees can go to for treatment for workplace injuries, but the clinic at SFGH is the only public clinic and receives roughly 9,000 visits a year — about half of all worker’s compensation cases in The City, Katz said.
The rest of the clinics are run privately, and services, such as case management, are handled offsite. The case management is handled on site and free of charge at SFGH.
“The workers of The City including all of you, myself, we do have a set of choices,” Katz told the supervisors. But there was no data measuring the efficiency or inefficiency of the clinic because of the complications surrounding the gathering of that data.
Opponents to closure include teachers, Muni operators, firefighters and nurses. They allege that accounting practices at the private clinics would keep The City from saving any money because of increased worker’s compensation cost elsewhere, including, for instance, case management work being done off-site by insurance companies, said Dr. Stephen Born, the medical director for SFGH Occupational Health Services.
The closure would result in costs moving from one city department to another — “from one pocket to another,” Born said.
Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who asked for the hearing, said he will seek some legislative measure to keep the clinic from closing.
“This just does not smell right or feel right,” Mirkarimi said.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
11:13 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Medical center faces tough choices"
Report as inappropriate
1:27 PM MST on Tue., Feb. 26, 2008
re: "New psychiatric care center to fill a need"
Report as inappropriate
8:54 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008
re: "New psychiatric care center to fill a need"
Report as inappropriate
4:43 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 1, 2008
re: "Restaurant group opposes S.F. bid to reinstate health plan"
Report as inappropriate
1:29 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 28, 2007
re: "Health center for immigrants opens"
Report as inappropriate
5:16 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007
re: "Health center for immigrants opens"
Report as inappropriate
9:28 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 7, 2007
re: "Plan to expand health insurance clears a hurdle"
Report as inappropriate
8:25 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 23, 2007
re: "Howard County to offer health care to all uninsured residents"
Report as inappropriate
2:24 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 21, 2007
re: "GBMC, Hopkins Medicine team up"
Report as inappropriate
7:48 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007
re: "New stent aids diabetes patients"
Report as inappropriate
9:31 AM MST on Thu., May. 3, 2007
re: "Raise your hand, if you’re sure"
Report as inappropriate
10:03 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 26, 2007
re: "Miss Maryland to talk to teens about skin cancer"
Report as inappropriate
11:52 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 25, 2007
re: "Miss Maryland to talk to teens about skin cancer"
Report as inappropriate
Albert Franklin said:
However, when the County chooses to address the $2 billion dollars Jerry Brown bilked from them in a meaningful manner, then this should all become most academic!
14 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As an employee of SF General Hospital's psych dept., where none of us wear uniforms nor have lines on the floor that patients can't cross and where we train patients to take better care of themselves (including the activities of daily living such as nutrition, personal hygeine and the like), I am a bit mystified by John Nickens' comments. Has he been in a hospital in the past 20 years or so?
54 agree | 42 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I love the fact that they are turning Dore Alley (not Street) from an iconic Gay area into another crazy person magnet in the already crazy SOMA. Last year a doorman at the Powerhouse came to the defense of a patron being attacked by a nut-job housed across the street (along door alley) by another "non" profit. The police arrested the DOORMAN for gods sake, and the Powerhouse had to hold fundraisers to pay his legal expenses. Why is the City being allowed to take our great SOMA neighborhood and turn it into another Tenderloin? How sad.
49 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
jacksmith said:
Insurance mandates are not universal health care. And politicians should stop calling it that. Nothing is Universal Health Care except "Single Payer Not For Profit Tax Supported Government Managed Health Care" (HR 676). Insurance mandates will be worse than what you have now. And what you have now is a complete, and total disgrace, and horror show. Insurance mandates will (require) you to buy insurance from the private insurance companies that have been ripping you off, and killing you by the thousands.
99 agree | 82 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
know of a guy who came here for a couple of years and got on the welfare medical roles in san francisco and had major surgery done to a problem eye he was born with in Mexico, had the work done at taxpayer expense and moved back to Mexico permanently. Wow and I can't even get medical insurance without breaking the bank.
86 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jeff, an Independent said:
I wonder how many Illegal Aliens are going to exploit this...
111 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The sheep want to give O'Malley a health care victory.
109 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Another rash decision by the immature Ulman. You are going to have people move to Howard County just for the free medical insurance. That'll be good for the tax base. Ulman was "Secretary of the Cabinet" under Glendening, the worst MD governor in the last 30 years. Under Ulman's Cabinet leadership, Glendening created a structural deficit that we deal with still today. Ulman deserves the blame for this. Now we are going to support another big-government idea from him? Unless, of course, Ulman wasn't really "Secretary of the Cabinet" under Glendening. But that would mean he would have lied about his resume, which can't be the case.
127 agree | 116 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Stephanie Shantz said:
I'm sorry for going on and on, but if Dr. Renold Keyser wouldn' have told my parents what he found I would not be here today. It began when I was 6 months, then a different tumor when I was 5 years old. Dr. Howard Lederman was my Dr. at JHH, both are my angels. Even though I have lasting effects, I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for them both. Dr. Renold Keyser is from Hagerstown MD, I love them both and Dr. Howard Lederman is from JHH. Dr. Alex Hollar did my surgery, he was chief of surgery back then. I still keep in contact w both dr's. I was given a second chance. So if anyone that reads this has any doubt about their sickness Please go to JHH. They will save ur life. I'm now 26 yrs. old and doing great because of them. My email is sshantz123@yahoo.com if u have any questions or would just like to talk. I enjoy helping people and trying to give back what was given to me. Dr. Cindy Swartz was also a big help, however she's not there anymore, she moved to NY and is now the d
479 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Could this be the begining of the end. Med companies will probably buy up the Patents to save their income. How can we stop them?
306 agree | 549 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The below site has great information about hyperhidrosis and its treatments. They also offer Free brochures and a Free e-newsletter. www.SweatHelp.org
346 agree | 312 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Perhaps Miss Lietz should read the harvard medical school study that came out this march stating Indoor tanning prevents melonoma cancer, thats the Dana -Farber cancer institute, Miss Lietz was scheldued in Annapolis to address this at a legistative meeting she did not show, thats www.dana-farber.org
367 agree | 330 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I doubt that Miss Lietz will be telling the students about the Harvard Medical School's Dana Farber Cancer Institute study that concluded "Tanning Protects Against Skin Cancer." Miss Lietz should stop blaming herself for getting skin cancer. She should know by now that nothing she did caused her to get the disease. It's genetic. Tanning didn't cause it. Tanning salons are not to blame. The fact of the matter is, moderate tanning is healthy behavior. It prevents more diseases by the processing of vitamin D3. It's time for Miss Lietz to go back to Nursing School. She has a lot to learn.
380 agree | 316 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree