CHANGE MY LOCATION
Local
California News
Multimedia News
Ulman seeks to scrap plans for new government campus
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - After the county spent more than $7 million on the design of a new government campus, Howard County Executive Ken Ulman wants to scrap plans for the project.
Instead, he is proposing to renovate Howard’s existing office space, abandoning an office-consolidation plan officials have discussed for a decade.
“The county has growing space needs, [and] we believe they can be more affordably accommodated,” Ulman said.
Ulman proposed a major overhaul to the main George Howard office building, replacing its aged heating and air conditioning systems, ceilings, lights and bathrooms.
The plan also would include building a warehouse near the county’s Dorsey building in Columbia to free up space, upgrading the Dorsey and Gateway buildings, and purchasing space in Meridian Square, a proposed office building in Oakland Mills.
The news comes as the County Council is considering an amendment to the budget to allow the county to buy the space in Meridian Square for $4 million. Ulman said he would request that the County Council withdraw the measure and propose a new item in the fiscal 2009 budget outlining his new plan.
The cost for the first phase of the initial project, including a government building and parking garage, had swelled to nearly $130 million, Ulman said.
Renovations, a new warehouse and the Meridian Square purchase will total $35 million to $40 million, Ulman said. Selling unused county-owned land could further offset the costs.
Last year’s budget included $16 million for the campus project, about $10 million of which would go toward renovations.
County officials had wanted to consolidate offices, and the George Howard building was considered too small, Public Works Director Jim Irvin said.
The county has paid Corporate Office Properties Trust $7.4 million so far for the plans, but tight economic times and a new look at existing space prompted the new direction, Ulman said.
Council Chairwoman Courtney Watson, D-District 1, said although it was “not ideal” that the county had spent money on the plans, a new building could be revisited in the future.
“What the new plan represents is a short-term solution to the county’s needs,” she said.
smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com
Comments from Examiner Readers
8:13 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Howard land-use group releases recommendations to involve public"
Report as inappropriate
11:25 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Two Council proposals take aim at the ‘infill’ development"
Report as inappropriate
5:13 AM MST on Sun., Feb. 3, 2008
re: "Ulman seeks to scrap plans for new government campus"
Report as inappropriate
4:29 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 11, 2008
re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"
Report as inappropriate
7:34 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 10, 2008
re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"
Report as inappropriate
1:09 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007
re: "Council questions office-space purchase"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
This task force was heavily skewed toward the land development community.
7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
We are an extremly confused nation. We are not creating new urban areas, we are growing by about 2 million people a year, we want affordable housing, we want long time resident to never have to move, we don't want change or more density with 'infill', we want continued mass immigration -- often the same people and political parties are for all these things.
77 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I can't believe Ulman would waste over $7 million by abandoning plans, while at the same time giving his donor buddy a sweetheart lease with County funds. Wait a minute - I can believe it because Ulman is a deceptive arrogant jerk who slanders Mary Kay Sigaty to steal an election.
87 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Traffic engineers wouldn’t stay in business if they used false assumptions or data" Why not? Politicians stay in business when they use false data on their resumes. "Secretary of the Cabinet" anyone?
89 agree | 93 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Any protests to traffic conditions, etc., under Howard County's new administration will be ignored. What Mr. Ulman wants, Mr. Ulman will get. Remember this the next time you go to the polls.
90 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Doesn't a contributor to Ulman own the building where Ulman wants to sign an overpriced lease? But, just because someone fakes their resume to get elected, doesn't mean they will continue their dishonesty once in office...
110 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree