Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Sixty years later, Pacific Union/GMAC agents Dona Crowder, Constance Heldman and Peggy Economos were charged by Mitchell to put the family home on the market. For six months, they stewed over price. Rumors circulated that they’d refused an offer for $25 million, that the home would be priced at a record-setting $75 million.
Finally, in April of 2007, owner and agents agreed on an asking price of $55 million.
It is certainly not easy to sell a home that is priced in the stratosphere. Ask the owners of the unfinished manse at 2845 Broadway, just a block away. It has sat on the market, priced at $65 million, since March of 2006.
Mitchell held several fund-raisers on-site in 2007 and allowed her home to be part of the San Francisco Decorator Showcase’s 30th year celebration. She is a regular in the pages of the Nob Hill Gazette and the San Francisco society scene; her home drew curious onlookers from all over the region.
Still, almost a year has passed and the home is still for sale.
What does a potential buyer get for $55,000,000? The home has seven bedrooms and 7½ bathrooms, a library, a music room, a curio room, two kitchens and a 600-square-foot living room, spread out over four levels. A fifth level contains a two-car garage.
It also has one of the only private outdoor tennis courts in The City, and views of Alcatraz, the Golden Gate Bridge and Marin County.
2901 Broadway promises a lifestyle most of us can only imagine. Somewhere out there is a buyer for whom that life is real.




Comments from Examiner Readers
5:32 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 28, 2008 re: "Hot Property: S.F. mansion with tennis court"
Report as inappropriate
10:56 AM MST on Sun., Jan. 27, 2008
re: "Hot Property: S.F. mansion with tennis court"
Report as inappropriate
2:20 AM MST on Sun., Jan. 27, 2008
re: "Hot Property: S.F. mansion with tennis court"
Report as inappropriate
12:11 AM MST on Sat., Jan. 26, 2008
re: "Hot Property: S.F. mansion with tennis court"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
San Francisco real estate sells in an international market that makes us compete with billionaires from around the world. This place will probably be bought by someone that already owns a half dozen other residences. You could get twice the house in a number of other cities for a fraction of the price, but it's location, location, location.
86 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Soothy Sayer said:
Real Estate Sellers, like bankers, are becoming one of the most despised occupations. WAAAY back in Bibical times it was a sin to charge interest. And these real estate people have pumped up fictitious absurd greedy inhuman unhumane gluttonous prices for properties. This is an OLD house, granted the likes of which a new generation will never be able to live in or afford. This typifies the greed and sinfulness of that past generation. SHAME SHAME SHAME to the owner and the real estate people. It is NOT worth 55 million.. maybe 155,000.00 and then please have the stucco work, painting and garage door opener working, or is this too much to ask?
105 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Peter George White said:
Whenever I look at the Real Estate Section, especially at these little homes in the Sunset or elsewhere, that twenty years ago were priced at $100K or less, I just "sigh" and also angry. None of these cheap rowhouses, many of them built in the 30's and 40's for around $10K or less (much less), are not worth the asking prices of 2008. A RECESSION IS A GOOD THING ! SF IS ABSURD ! JUST ABSURD !!!!!!!! And clearly not worth the greedy prices.
97 agree | 105 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
King of the Dynasty said:
How is it that a mega-million dollar white elephant that can't find a buyer is called "hot property"? The tacky additions and lousy plaster work done on this Pacific Heights mansion will require millions restore. I'm taking a pass and investing in baseball cards this year.
100 agree | 103 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree