Examiner.com // 10 mins ago
Examiner.com // 34 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 1 hr 16 mins ago
Quick Read | NBC 4 // 1 hr 58 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 2 hrs 8 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 2 hrs 9 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 2 hrs 40 mins ago
Examiner.com // 3 hrs ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 3 hrs ago
Quick Read | Daily News // 3 hrs ago
 
   
State emphasizing carpooling in HOT lanes
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Virginia transportation officials are hoping 3,750 additional commuter parking spaces along the Interstate 95 corridor will reduce concerns about the planned high-occupancy toll lanes wiping away Northern Virginia’s carpool culture.

The proposed high-occupancy vehicle lanes running from the Pentagon to Massaponax would be open to vehicles with at least three passengers and to commuter buses, and would generate millions of dollars annually from single commuters willing to pay a toll for quicker commutes.

The new plan would use $37 million of $298 million projected state revenue from the toll lanes to construct thousands of additional park-and-ride spaces for bus riders and so-called slug lines. Those spaces would be added to the 3,000 already included in the project, said Tanya Husick, project manager for the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation.

Most commuters who regularly carpool with strangers at existing park-and-ride lots, so-called slugs —82 percent — said in a recent agency survey that they will try to continue their current practices with the new lanes.

But 71 percent said they are concerned the changes would threaten those commuting practices.

“What I think we’re seeing is that there is a big concern, but the reality of what people are planning to do does not match up with that concern,” Husick said.

Del. Paul Nichols, D-Woodbridge, who is trying in Richmond to block the HOT lanes, said he believes opposition to the lanes is widespread based on his twice-weekly campaign visits to park-and-ride lots in the fall.

“This was hundreds of people and everybody made it a point to make it known they are against them,” Nichols said.

dgenz@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:13 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008 re: "HOT lanes foes cite dangers to migratory birds"

Examiner Reader said:
(sarcasm) It's great that they are willing to only destroy the trees in the birds’ foraging space, and not the actual trees where they nest. I mean sure, now they'll have a place to sleep, they just won't have anything to eat. Absolutely lovely.

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:12 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Bill halting HOT lanes faces slim odds"

Examiner Reader said:
Discrimination. Is VA really adding public roadways that only the rich could afford? Why are the rich the only ones entitled to a fast commute? Am I paying to build these lanes? If so I will be paying for a road that I can't even afford to ride on. Is that really public? Since when is it ok to segregate the population? Rich people over here! Talk about separate and unequal. This state disgusts me.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:28 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Aging bridges, ramps to be replaced as HOT lanes added"

Examiner Reader said:
And what happens when the "bill" for these lanes is paid off? I guess they'll continue to charge us like they do for the Dulles Toll Road. If the funds go to something productive (i.e. upkeep/upgrade of existings roads) that's fine...I just hope that's the case. I wish they had added the purple line back in the day when Metrorail was still being constructed. It would have been a lot cheaper then...

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:34 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Bill halting HOT lanes faces slim odds"

Examiner Reader said:
How about using that lane to make a metro line instead?

69 agree | 60 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)