
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Alexandria has reached a settlement with three taxicab companies that were suing the city over its 2005 ordinance that required each cab company to average at least two dispatch calls per driver per day, The Examiner has learned.
Columbus Cab, King Cab and VIP Cab were scheduled to lose their certificates at the end of the month for failing to meet the city’s quota, but have been granted a six-month extension under the terms of the settlement, said Tom Culpepper, deputy director of transportation and environmental services.
Culpepper declined to disclose the other terms.
Alexandria officials drafted the cab ordinance to ensure the city’s taxis were serving Alexandria residents and not just Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport customers, Culpepper said, and also to ensure that independent cab drivers benefited from working for a cab company.
“One of the issues that the drivers brought up repeatedly when the city was revising the code was: What do we get from these companies for the dues that we pay them?” he said. “In a number of cases it was nothing, except for the privilege of using their colors.”
VIP Cab owner Zari Karimian said most of her drivers’ business comes from the airport, but a good portion also comes from on-street pickups and cab stations in Alexandria, which the city doesn’t count toward the quota.
Dispatch calls are few and far between, she said.
“We have more than 700 taxis in Alexandria — we have way too many for this small city,” she said.
Street pickups and cab-stand trips account for 20 percent of the Alexandria taxicab market, or about 1,000 trips a day, according to city records. Dispatch calls make up 40 percent of the market, and many of the remaining 40 percent of trips are from the airport.
Of Alexandria’s seven certified cab companies, Columbus, King, VIP and Union failed to meet the city’s dispatch quota. City rules allow Union additional time because it is a new company.
“Two calls a day is a pretty minimal amount if you look at it from a driver’s perspective,” Culpepper said. “We’re asking the company to do their marketing and develop their customer base to give these drivers some business.”
Alexandria will continue to allow 721 taxis in the city regardless of whether the companies lose their certification. Drivers will be allowed to move to different companies, Culpepper said.
tluntz@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
7:10 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 2, 2008 re: "Taxi meter enforcement under way in the District"
Report as inappropriate
8:55 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Few D.C. cabs ready as meter deadline looms"
Report as inappropriate
9:57 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Few D.C. cabs ready as meter deadline looms"
Report as inappropriate
8:02 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Judge backs taxis’ switch to meters"
Report as inappropriate
7:53 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 8, 2008
re: "Group: More cabbie strikes ahead"
Report as inappropriate
10:59 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 5, 2008
re: "Group: More cabbie strikes ahead"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008
re: "Fenty announces cuts to cab fares"
Report as inappropriate
12:44 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007
re: "D.C. cabdrivers want residency exemption extended further"
Report as inappropriate
8:34 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 28, 2007
re: "New maps for cabs but eye is on meters"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
"Metered cab fares start at $3, plus a $1 gas surcharge, and increase 25 cents for each one-sixth of a mile traveled, or for every minute stopped in traffic or moving under 10 mph." That is a $4 drop charge. Seems like it is way too much. Lower it.
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Karl Rudder said:
On November 6, 1931 the DC Public Utilities Commission issued order no. 956 and listed 20 reasons to, "deny any version of the zone system to replace meters in DC taxicabs." (Free copy of PUC order no. 956 available by calling the Public Service Commission) Congress passed insulting legislation that forced the use of the zone system ("The Taxicab Rider" Wash. Post editorial 11/13/71) regardless of the fact that Judge Adkins completely upheld PUC order no. 956 (PUR 1932C pg 1) and the Appeals Court upheld Judge Adkins decision. The DC City Council has wasted hundreds of millions of dollars in maintaining the DC Taxicab Commission since 1987 just as Congress had created the DCTC and now the installation of meters in DC cabs is being persistently presented as merely an element of liking of Mayor Fenty. I have testified before the DC City Council since 1975 to make issue of the still standing court decisions to expose the fact that the DC taxicab zone system had not ever been approved!
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Karl Rudder said:
My address to the unique DC Taxicab Zone System has always been based on the basic, undeniable yet little known facts. Fact 1 - Meters were the original means that were used to compute taxicab fares in the District of Columbia. Fact 2 - The "zone system" was denied by the DC Public Utilities Commission for 20 reasons when they issued PUC order no. 956 on 11/6/31. (Free copy of PUC order no. 956 is available by calling the DC Public Service Commission) Fact 3 - The decision by the DC Public Utilities Commission was completely upheld by Judge Adkins (1932 PUR volC page 1) and Judge Adkins decision was upheld by the DC Appeals Court. (1932 75 F2d 1005) Fact 4 - The District of Columbia is the only major city in this country that does not use a meter to equitably compute taxicab fares as well as serve as a reliable means to record the income and compute the taxes due from local taxicab companies and drivers. Fact 5 - Reason no. 9 on PUC order no. 956 stated: "That proper account
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a D.C. resident who is excited to be able to economically ride taxis again, I say "hallelujah." The taxi industry's attempts to convince people that time-and-distance meters will result in higher prices are laughable.
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Billy Ray Edwards said:
I know why you censored my comment on the DC taxicab issue,all one has to do is check Mayor Fenty,Campain finance you will find out the Mayor took money from VA and MD taxicab CO.
79 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
hurricanewarningdc said:
I feel no sympathy for the cab drivers. None at all. The problem isn't that they'll make less money on the meter system than the zone system. Rather, the problem is that since most cabbies are crooks (in my experience and the experience of every person I know who lives in or visits DC), the meter system will reduce the extra money that they were pocketing illegally. They'll likely make more money with more rides via meter... but if you tack on what they were getting for the false charges for extra zones, baggage fees, etc, some will definitely lose out. As a consumer, all I can say is "bravo."
65 agree | 80 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Steve said:
Thank you, Mayor, not only for the meters but making sure that they are reasonable. How DC cabs think they deserve higher than New York ones is beyond me. And do they really think the strike will cripple the city? Guess what. We consumers can strike, too. No tips until this is resolved.
111 agree | 97 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Billy Ray Edwards said:
It should not be a decission of the mayor on meters in this unique histrocal taxicabs system in DC and the residents should have right to make this decission though referedum with the vote.
136 agree | 153 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
recyclist said:
Let's switch to meters already!!! It's simply ridiculous that we are still clinging to this unfair and arbitrary zone system. And while we're at it, let's get rid of the fuel surcharge and replace it with a per-mile or per-minute fuel rate increase. Why should a person taking a 1-mile trip pay the same fuel surcharge as someone traveling from NW to SE? Let the users pay the actual costs of their cab rides.
219 agree | 211 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree