It's a bicycle built for pure water, too
Article History
There are updates to this article.
From left, Adam Mack, Brian Mason, Eleanor Morgan, John Lai and Paul Silberschatz designed the Aquaduct, a bicycle that helps provide clean drinking water.
(Courtesy photo)
From left, Adam Mack, Brian Mason, Eleanor Morgan, John Lai and Paul Silberschatz designed the Aquaduct, a bicycle that helps provide clean drinking water.

A group of young Peninsula designers who just wanted to have fun creating a new bicycle ended up making a funky-looking device that could help solve a health issue plaguing 1.1 billion people across the world.

Team Aquaduct, a five-member Peninsula squad consisting of design professionals from the Palo Alto- and San Francisco-based firm Ideo, created a bike in 2½ weeks that provides clean drinking water using only renewable energy.

Here’s how the Aquaduct bike works: Someone pedals the blue, tricycle-like machine to a water source such as a pond and fills a 20-gallon tank in the back of the bike. While riding back, the pedaling powers the water through a filtration device in the middle of the bike, and the filtered water is deposited in a two-gallon tank in front of the handlebars.

Last week, the bike won Google’s “Innovate or Die Pedal-Powered Machine Contest,” which challenged 102 teams across the country to create a pedal-powered solution to offset climate change.

Now, the team is receiving interest from water-filter manufacturers and other groups that want to expand the prototype on a wider scale, and more than 520,000 people have viewed its YouTube video demonstration.

“Filters are a huge challenge in the developing world,” said group member Adam Mack, 24, of Menlo Park. “There will be families and villages changed by us winning the competition.”

Mack is one of four twentysomethings in the group, joined by 44-year-old John Lai, of San Bruno. Working and living on the Peninsula and in Silicon Valley meant the group already started with the “spirit of invention,” Lai said. The environmental awareness the team experiences on an everyday basis in the Bay Area also gave it an advantage in the competition, he said.

The group originally kicked around ideas inspired by local events, said member Brian Mason, 26, of Menlo Park. The team discussed a pedal-powered oil skimmer in light of the Cosco Busan spill and a pedal-powered water-transport device that could have helped combat the recent Southern California wildfires, he said.

The group is donating its prize money to KickStart International, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that specializes in developing new technologies.

“We can see a business model where individual entrepreneurs could use the bike to sell clean water door to door in the developing world,” KickStart development Director Ken Weimar said.

mrosenberg@examiner.com

By the numbers

» 1.1 billion: People without clean drinking water worldwide

» 101: Groups Team Aquaduct defeated

» 20: Gallons the rear tank can hold

» 2: Gallons of filtered water the front tank can hold

» $5,000: Team Aquaduct’s prize for winning

» 50 cents: Monthly cost to maintain bike’s filter

» 2½: Weeks spent on project

Source: Team Aquaduct, contest officials


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

3:12 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

Examiner Reader said:
I've discovered that at least 80% of the pile placed there is contaminated by fuel and human waste from a broken sewer pipe and the rest is probably been contaminated by contact. The City directed where to leave it. Their plan is to have all of the contaminents wash out into the community and then stick one of the contractors with the cost of moving it once it is "clean". City pays to dispose of contaminated materials, contractor pays to move uncontaminated (now you see their game). City will not share test results after "dog and pony show" of moving 12 truck loads. I'm sure we will see results once they get a good test. It is amazing that City wastes money on politically connected but utterly useless layer of "consulting" oversite (they already use RK&K, Whiting Turner & qualified good city inspectors and also 4th unnamed layer of pointless political money related oversight) , but will not pay to protect residents from contaminated material. All easily verified by good reporter

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:46 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Severn Savings Bank debuts largest green roof in Annapolis"

Mike said:
I bet Severn Savings wishes they had not built this green monster/white elephant now that the stock price has gone from 22 to 6...yikes!

0 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:05 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "In reversal, city to remove toxic dirt"

Examiner Reader said:
nothing like a pile of dirt in the city!

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:56 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "Steep fees for felled trees — if Belmont has its way"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess the City of Belmont is more worried about saving its dying and hazardous trees than the homeless camps that were being covered by these trees. I personally was happy to see the trees removed I was always worried about the big branches overhanging the roadway that were broken not to mention that the homeless camp was sent packing because they lost their cover of the tree branches hanging down. Why would the city sue them for providing a great service, except they want money from the little guys.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:57 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Toxin-laden dirt poses no threat, according to Baltimore officials"

Examiner Reader said:
You can bet on it that if the pile of dirt had been left in Roland Park, it would be gone PDQ.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Toxin-laden dirt poses no threat, according to Baltimore officials"

Examiner Reader said:
Solution - Either move it or put up a 12 foot high fence around it with security 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week. (whichever is cheaper.

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:52 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

Examiner Reader said:
Great. I live two blocks away and walk my dog past that pile of dirt. Wonderful Baltimore. Just wonderful.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

johnn said:
not dixsons clean and green program is it

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:56 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "Greenbelt can continue preservation"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess when the salmon count is so low that wildlife agencies have to place a mandatory ban on fishing to replenish their numbers, and when the whales are about 10-15% thinner, it's a sign that the oceans are stressed out. Kudos to the state Supreme Court for protecting the ocean and giving our coasts protective areas to restore ecosystems and rejuvenate her marine life.

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:23 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Dark skies for solar-training plan"

Examiner Reader said:
Policy issues related to the solar program need to be vetted before money is spent, McGoldrick told The Examiner in an e-mail. The supervisor characterized Solar City’s threat to abandon The City as “greenmail.” Oh man...can someone please get goldbricker McGoldrick to get a real life, hopefully one not in public service! Geeze if this guy ran the world we would be forever spitting in the wind.

10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:02 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
Next step: Wire Hangers!!! (Dry cleaners don't seem to want them back).

11 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
I throw everything I can into the recycling bin and let them decide.

13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:23 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Maryland’s coastal grass continues to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
i think the bicycle built for water is a dum story

15 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:36 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 31, 2008 re: "It's a bicycle built for pure water, too"

Examiner Reader said:
how much will the bike cost?

14 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:48 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 29, 2008 re: "The City gets dark tonight"

Examiner Reader said:
Good. Can't wait for the criminals to do a number on the City!

14 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
there are no heading on what each paragraph is about

158 agree | 197 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Bob said:
What concerns me isn't so much all this green stuff; (and green is just a buzz word for Corporate America to make big bucks)what is being done to animal species being wiped off the face of the earth? Polar bear, Rhinos (being slaughered for their horns); elephants, snow tigers, and the list goes on and on;

223 agree | 176 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:43 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Examiner Reader said:
all this green is a bunch of crap....i still burn wood, drive my car alone to work (better than some smelly bus or bart) do not recycle..thats what i pay those garbagemen for. i would rather use my firplace and wood than pay Pacific Grred and Extortion zny of their rip bills.

230 agree | 186 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:21 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Audubon study sees local birds particularly threatened"

Another Examiner Reader said:
Sure nuclear power is "clean." Just ask the Chernobylites.

224 agree | 235 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:56 PM MST on Thu., May. 24, 2007 re: "Experts: Light pollution growing environmental problem"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you for this article. However it needs more development, especially in the area of light trespass onto down hill property. Full cut off on level ground is not full cut off on slopes. Also, motion detectors often activate when a person walks on his own property and is detected by the neighbor's poorly designed/installed system. Please consider this in the future.

647 agree | 425 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
Al Gore should provide more support for nuclear power. When you come to the realization that we have to STOP using fossil fuels, there is nothing else that can produce the huge amount of power that would be required to replace fossil fuels. Nuclear already provides 20% of our electric power. Nuclear power is as cheap or maybe cheaper than coal, especially when you compare 'clean coal' vs. nuclear. It is time we started replacing all of our coal fired power plants with nuclear.

866 agree | 426 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:27 AM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Environmental advisers request study of county’s waste stream"

Sandy Wisner said:
Dear Kelsey, If you take 15% of one portion of a thing and 17% of another portion of the same thing, you will not get 32% of the whole. Depending on the size of the portions, you will have between 15 and 17 percent of the whole.

614 agree | 452 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)