Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty announced a $200 million financing program for the development of the Southwest waterfront area Wednesday, a contribution that will make up roughly 18 percent of the $1.1 billion project.
The public funds will be allocated for new parks, piers and infrastructure, Fenty said during a waterfront press conference, calling the step a “milestone” in the progress of the project.
The legislation for the funding approval, as well as the land deposition authority, were introduced before the D.C. Council on Monday.
Legislation also has to be introduced to close Water Street permanently.
The project will create over 3,000 construction jobs and about 2,800 permanent jobs, according to Monty Hoffman, chief executive officer of developer PN Hoffman.
The project is being undertaken by Hoffman-Struever Waterfront LLC.
The financing will be paid back in future taxes through the Tax Increment Financing and Payment-In-Lieu-of-Taxes programs.
The D.C. government estimates the revitalized area will bring in $32 million in sales and property taxes, compared with the current $4.5 million.
This area is “one of the most underutilized parts of D.C.,” said Ward 6 Councilmember Tommy Wells.
That estimate of revenue is conservative, said Nina Albert, real estate development manager at Deputy Mayors Office of Planning and Economic Development.
Despite national economic worries about the future, the conditions in the metro region are “not as gloomy” as some say, said Hoffman. “I feel very good” about economic conditions.
Hoffman estimated the city could earn $40 million in taxes, noting the mixed-use nature of the project “hedges” against some economic troubles.
In total, a combined 767 condos and apartments will be built, and at least 30 percent will be designated as affordable housing.
About 100 new businesses will come into the area, with about 1.3 million square feet of space for offices (400,000 square feet), retail (280,000 square feet), hotels (476,000 square feet) and cultural purposes (150,000 square feet).
Government officials and the developers hope the council will pass the legislation this spring. Construction could begin in early 2010, with completion of the first phase occurring in 2014.
wblake@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
5:13 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 8, 2007 re: "Massive development for Anacostia"
Report as inappropriate
5:07 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 8, 2007
re: "D.C.'s $40B agenda for development"
Report as inappropriate
10:12 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007
re: "Massive development for Anacostia"
Report as inappropriate
6:32 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007
re: "Massive development for Anacostia"
Report as inappropriate
4:06 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 19, 2007
re: "D.C.'s $40B agenda for development"
Report as inappropriate
12:11 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 19, 2007
re: "D.C.'s $40B agenda for development"
Report as inappropriate
10:56 AM MST on Mon., Nov. 19, 2007
re: "D.C.'s $40B agenda for development"
Report as inappropriate
Condovet said:
condos are the ENRON of housing---no oversight no regulation, no recourse but the civil courts---and no warning because too many entities make money off them. The only thing worse than a condo--is a cheap (affordable) condo.
141 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Anacostiawen4hu said:
Just like the frontier!!!!! Ya-right---and guess who the indians are?!?@!- and the plans for them-- Get a map---the Giant/Camp Simms development isn't in Anacostia---neither are any of the people quoted in your article living there.
145 agree | 139 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why does DC deserve that $40B? MD or VA needs it more to fix their massive budget deficits!
151 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Great idea but how much will it take to buy one of these condo's most likely the prices will be to expensive for the average DC governemnt worker and/or Federal worker.
154 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
>>Re: D.C.'s $40B agenda for development<<: Given the decaying U.S. financial situation, will this be like the 1990s, where developers demolished downtown but could not raise money to build planned projects? That tore the heart out of the city. Can we avoid repeating this? If so, how?
199 agree | 172 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How much of that $40 Billion will be left after the DC Govt. starts embezzling it??? They've been practicing recently.
201 agree | 184 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Ind. Presidential Candidate - middleclass2008.com said:
How about fixing the school system first? DC is ranked DEAD LAST in the nation, and even ranks below many third world countries. Unbelievable.
192 agree | 205 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree