State closing Rosewood
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Former Rosewood Center resident Anna Burkett, of Annapolis, listens as Gov. Martin O’Malley announces his plan to close the center during a Tuesday news conference in Owings Mills. – Chris Ammann/Examiner

Former Rosewood Center resident Anna Burkett, of Annapolis, listens as Gov. Martin O’Malley announces his plan to close the center during a Tuesday news conference in Owings Mills. – Chris Ammann/Examiner

Ownings Mills, MD (Map, News) - Gov. Martin O’Malley ordered a maligned state-run facility for people with developmental disabilities to be closed in the next 18 months and its 156 residents moved to community settings.

“This was a decision that was, quite frankly, very difficult if you walk down these halls and talk to these individuals,” he said Tuesday.

The governor’s announcement came after years of reports detailing abuse and neglect at the Rosewood Center in Owings Mills. The state banned admissions to the Baltimore County center three times during the past year as reports detailed bungled prescriptions, razor blades in the yard and stabbings.

The state will work to place each resident — some ordered to Rosewood by courts that found them not competent to stand trial — in other institutions or group homes, said Maryland Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene John Colmers.

An assessment found most of the facility’s residents can live in community settings.

Carol Fried, an advocate with ARC of Maryland, celebrated the decision, which she called overdue.

“People with developmental disabilities want rich lives and have friends and go bowling and be part of the day-to-day world,” Fried said.

But some family members of residents who have spent their entire lives in Rosewood said community settings might prove more dangerous.

Harry Yost, whose son, Larry, is a 46-year resident of Rosewood, said conditions in Rosewood have steadily improved, and the reports are grossly exaggerated.

“We had no say in the process,” Yost said. “Safety doesn’t seem to be a consideration.”

Yost said O’Malley met with family members before the announcement and agreed to meet again in 90 days.

The decision also angered the facility’s 500 employees, who O’Malley said will be transferred to other state jobs. Union president and Rosewood employee Barry Chapman said many of his co-workers blamed problems on the center’s court-ordered population.

The staff, he said, was never trained to deal with forensic patients.

The center, which dates to 1888 and once housed 3,700 residents, is on a 300-acre parcel of what is considered commercially attractive land. Some residents Tuesday said they fear the land will be sold to developers.

jmalarkey@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

6:08 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 6, 2008 re: "State closing Rosewood"

Sharon Diane True said:
My brother has been a resident of Rosewood since 1996. He loves it there and gets along well with all staffers. I can go there at anytime, they never know when to expect me and I have never seen anything out of the way or hear any complaints from my brother whom is well aware of what is going on around him. The governor never met with my family to imform of of the closing of Rosewood. I recently wrote a letter to him and have not had a reply. No repl? Probably because he doesn't want to hear what we have to say. He will not convince us that they can close Rosewood and place these patients in the neighborhood for less than it takes to downsize Rosewood on it's own property. These patients now have more staff members to look out for them whereas in a group home there would be only one or two attendants and in no way have the care they have now. We are furious that this closure is going to happen. THE GOVERNOR DOESN'T CARE ABOUT OUR FAMILY MEMBERS.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:38 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 16, 2008 re: "State closing Rosewood"

Examiner Reader said:
O'Malley's decision was the best answer!

35 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:32 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 16, 2008 re: "Disability activists demand officials shut down Rosewood"

Ashby said:
That is not worthy of a comment!

23 agree | 27 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:50 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 16, 2008 re: "State closing Rosewood"

Examiner Reader said:
Some say love is a new rosewood residence, with safegaurds, maybe. We will have to monitor this situation.

36 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:32 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 16, 2008 re: "State closing Rosewood"

Examiner Reader said:
Rosewood was never meant to house criminals (forensic patients) which began during the Glendenning administration. Rosewood was meant for children who were severely and mentally afflicted with developmental disabilities and because of those severe disabilities were expected to live out their normal life span in the protective safe atmosphere of Rosewood. O'Malley wants the Rosewood campus for its very valuable tax base. What a selfish and ruthless governor he is. O'Malley is not a man--he is a demon. What on earth is going to happen to those poor people? There is no place for those severely disabled people to go. My heart goes out to them and their families. This is a despicable and hateful act by O'Malley.

36 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:28 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 16, 2008 re: "State closing Rosewood"

plaid said:
" The center, which dates to 1888 and once housed 3,700 residents, is on a 300-acre parcel of what is considered commercially attractive land. Some residents Tuesday said they fear the land will be sold to developers." And this is the meat of O'Malley's decision: A payback to the robber barons who opened their wallets and put him in office. This governor is the most corrupt we've had in years! I know something about the population at Rosewood, and what those folks need is stability - something they will find hard to get in a community-based setting. I implore everyone to write their legislators to stop this order.

39 agree | 39 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:09 PM MST on Sun., Oct. 14, 2007 re: "Disability activists demand officials shut down Rosewood"

Examiner Reader said:
No one should want to be called activist, now a days, it is a dirty word in my vocabulary due to the ignorant unjust uproars. What happen to good old due gooders for good causes?

40 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:43 PM MST on Sun., Oct. 14, 2007 re: "Disability activists demand officials shut down Rosewood"

Examiner Reader said:
Where were these activists when the state appointed 4 interim temporary facility directors for Rosewood? I haven't seen any of these activists on Rosewood campus. Are they taking the lead from the media, which presents a slanted view to sell copy? The deficiencies at Rosewood are not representative of the total care provided at Rosewood. For example, would activists respond differently if they knew that only a single safety razor was found near a dumpster, versus the overhyped description of "razor blades scattered around residences." Was anyone actually harmed by this Bic razor? (nope). The good work being done at Rosewood by dedicated and skilled employees doesn't sell papers. Hey activists, tell us how wonderful the group home system works in Maryland? By all means, let's release all residents from Rosewood, even if many of them are felons. Who will accept them in their neighborhoods? Please, a balanced view is in order.

42 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)