Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
“It would have a severe, negative impact on future hotel development,” said Mary Jo McCulloch, president of the Maryland Hotel and Lodging Association.
“It will make people pause.”
County Executive John R. Leopold is calling for increases to impact fees that a developer pays to build houses, hotels, office parks and other buildings in the county.
The one-time fee is used to offset the cost of expanding roads and schools, and hiring more police officers and firefighters to accommodate the growth.
The increases are anywhere between three to seven times higher. The proposed legislation, for example, would raise the fee for a new three-bedroom house from $4,069 to $20,898.
The Home Builders Association of Maryland, along with other industries, say the fee could deter builders from coming to Anne Arundel.
The hotel industry, for example, is expanding around the Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport, Fort Meade and Annapolis. But with the cost of building a new hotel room at $150,000, additional fees may make it less profitable to open shop in Anne Arundel, officials say.
“I think builders and hotel owners will look at other areas than to build here,” McCulloch said.
“It’s just one more opportunity to run the costs of the county on guests.”
The increases also reach the boating industry, as new marinas will see their fees increase from $329 per berth to $2,149.
“With fuel prices going up, we’re getting less traffic — we can’t take any more hits,” said Ken Jefferies, president of the Bay Charter Captains Association, based in the Chesapeake Bay area.
Higher costs for building marinas may hinder new facilities in the county, which considers its waterways a valuable economic asset, he said.
How the County Council will react to the proposed fees will be seen in the coming weeks. Some have already said the fees are too high.
County Councilman Daryl Jones, D-District 1, who represents part of the BWI hotel district, said though he has not decided on where he stands on the proposed fees, he believes higher fees will not stop growth.
“Right now there is too much demand in this county for higher fees to curb development,” Jones said.
Anne Arundel has a $1 billion backlog in school construction and is facing state funding cuts and reduced revenues because of the slumping housing market.
jflanagan@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
9:10 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 19, 2008 re: "Public comment missing from fee debate in Anne Arundel"
Report as inappropriate
8:32 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 19, 2008
re: "Public comment missing from fee debate in Anne Arundel"
Report as inappropriate
9:24 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 16, 2008
re: "Higher fees could deter businesses eyeing county"
Report as inappropriate
5:17 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 7, 2008
re: "Anne Arundel Council divided over impact fees for developers"
Report as inappropriate
Ditto said:
Well, thanks for debate 101. Of course affordable housing is the answer. Yes, time is money. The rocket scientist plan only benifits whom?? The housing market pick up in the spring, regardless of recesion.
82 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It is misleading to describe these fees as imposed on developers. They do not punish developers, they do not diminish the amount of land developed, they raise the prices of homes, the end user pays them. And because they are part of the cost of doing business, because profit is calculated on cost, developers and builders actually make money on these fees--and they must, if you understand how profit works. Builders and developers oppose these fees because they raise the price of homes, which reduces the market in size--fewer people have the money or appetite to buy the homes, which means the homes stay on the market longer and thus prices go up further--time = money. How sad that all of this is going on.
77 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How much can everyone pay to Maryland. I believe this will slow everything down even more. Which hurts contractors in the building industry. We already pay enough for permits. Which we can't even get in a timely matter.
89 agree | 90 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jen W said:
Another reason I LOVE Leopold. Developers are slime balls who could care less about the environment or anything else besides making money. It is about time they have to pay. Why should the tax payers bear the burden of more congestion and traffic while the developers keep getting richer?
100 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree