Examiners

David Pinto
Baseball Examiner
Most Recent Post
ALCS: Red Sox versus Rays

California News

Multimedia News

LA and Philly battle for the pennant
20 photos
Justin Maiuro of Mantua, NJ, shows off his Ph...
PETA gets naked and bloody again
16 photos
Partially clothed protesters seen with taped ...
Cute dogs, bulls and a green polar bear
15 photos
Dogs wait in line to be blessed during a bles...
High School Musical 3 Debate: Tisdale vs. Hudgens
20 photos
U.S. actress Ashley Tisdale arrives for the B...
Sexiest men alive
20 photos
In this July 25, 2008 file photo, San Diego C...

Frantz: So-called experts must let ‘non-issue’ go

Jan 14, 2008 3:00 AM (270 days ago) by Bob Frantz, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Tiger Woods forgave Kelly Tilghman for her comments. So should everyone else.
(AP file photo)
Tiger Woods forgave Kelly Tilghman for her comments. So should everyone else.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The first column I wrote for this newspaper, some seven years ago believe it or not, was a tribute to the backspace key. That’s right, I spent 600-plus words paying homage to a little piece of plastic with a backwards-pointed arrow; the one right next to the “=” and “+” key on any standard keyboard. The one that couldn’t be more valuable if it were made of platinum.

Allow me to explain: We in the broadcasting industry spend our entire careers speaking. In any given 3- or 4-hour radio program, for example, we will spit out literally thousands of words. In just a single calendar year, a typical talk radio host will utter tens of millions of words to convey tens of thousands of thoughts. And if you were to ask any one of them what their single greatest fear is, every one of them would likely tell you it’s that one of those words will be their career-killer.

One single ill-chosen word, articulated without thinking and highlighted among the millions of others before and after it, can undo an entire career of respected broadcast journalism — if the wrong person is offended by it. It’s like walking a verbal tightrope without a net. Every step can be as sure and confident as the last, perfectly balanced, until the one fateful slip that renders all that preceded it meaningless.

Unless that word is written rather than spoken, of course. Then it can be quickly destroyed without any record of its existence by the best friend of every print journalist or columnist working today: the backspace key.

This story continues below
Advertisement

What’s the point, you ask? The point is this: It’s a shame that Kelly Tilghman didn’t have a backspace key.

Make no mistake about it, if Tilghman had been writing for Golf Digest instead of speaking on The Golf Channel, her name would not have been dragged through the media mud for the last week or so and the Rev. Al Sharpton wouldn’t have made her the most recent stop on his Victimization Tour of America.

And why? Because the moment she would have typed the “h” in the word “lynch”, she would have looked at it and thought to herself, “No, that’s not the right word!” And she would have hit that little backwards arrow five times, deleting her error forever.

Tilghman has been suspended for two weeks by The Golf Channel for her mistake, which was to follow Nick Faldo’s suggestion that the rest of the PGA field “gang up on” Tiger Woods with the phrase, “lynch him in a back alley.” The suspension has been accepted by some, but considered a slap on the wrist by many, who believe the commentator should have been fired.

Clearly, Tilghman’s comment was nothing more than a pained attempt at humor, as she played off the imagery painted by Faldo of a group of golfers ganging up on Woods to stop him from lapping the field again this season. Tiger himself acknowledged as much when he called the story, through an agent, a “non-issue.”

So why is it such an issue?

It’s an issue because columnists, sports-talkers and activists such as Sharpton (who has demanded her firing) want it to be. For the past five days I’ve read and listened to “expert” after “expert” condemn Tilghman’s “poor choice of words” which is one of the most ignorant statements ever. They make it appear as though she had a list of words in front of her, and that she took her time surveying it, and then chose the most offensive word on it.

“Hmmm, what can the other golfers do to stop Tiger? I know, they should take him out and LYNCH him! Yes, they should hang him! That’s it!”

Give me a break. Tilghman simply opened her mouth too quickly following Faldo’s “gang up” remark, and didn’t take the time to think about the words that were coming out of it. Had she a backspace key, the word would have disappeared as quickly as it came, because she knew it was an error.

But it was a simple error, not a malicious one. A forgivable error. That’s why Tiger forgave her. So should we.

Sports personality Bob Frantz is a regular contributor to The Examiner. E-mail him at bfrantz@examiner.com.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

7:50 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 16, 2008 re: "Frantz: So-called experts must let ‘non-issue’ go"

Examiner Reader said:
If Phil Michelson was winning all the tournaments and someone suggested everyone gang up on him, and she had said the same word, no one would have a problem with it would they. White people always have to watch every word they say even when there is nothing racial involved in a comment. What other words are off limits they should publish a list so everyone knows whats okay and whats not

86 agree | 108 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:24 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 15, 2008 re: "Frantz: So-called experts must let ‘non-issue’ go"

Examiner Reader said:
I am a white male 44 and don't consider myself to be politically correct all of the time or overly concerned about it. That being said though, I don't think that I have used the word "lynched",in a casual way, ever. It is not in my vocabulary for a joking situation. I am afraid that it might have been in Kelly Tilgman's though. I think that to a certain degree if you are not racist then you will be very unlikely to make a racist remark because they are not in your vocabulary.

81 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:47 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 14, 2008 re: "Frantz: So-called experts must let Tilghman’s ‘non-issue’ go"

Examiner Reader said:
Here's a better question: Why are people like you so ready to assume the worst about someone based on one mistaken word? Frantz is right, if Tiger forgives her, and he's the one who knows her best, then why do people like you judge her so much?

102 agree | 87 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:51 AM MST on Mon., Jan. 14, 2008 re: "Frantz: So-called experts must let Tilghman’s ‘non-issue’ go"

Examiner Reader said:
I was reading your article on Kelly Tilgman and was wondering - do you ever make those sort of harmless remark when your hanging out with your black friends? I suspect the answer is no for a couple of reasons. 1st, you don't have any black friends, latino friends or asian friends. 2nd, no public person would say anything so dated and stupid. My question: why are dumb white guys like you so quick to dismiss these sorts of comments?

95 agree | 97 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement