Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia

Jan 3, 2008 12:00 AM (285 days ago) by Sara Michael, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Howard County’s final framework for downtown Columbia offers more emphasis in areas such as transit and open space, but the debate continues on how much detail the county should provide the Columbia landowner.

“We felt it was important to leave it as it was intended to be — a framework that would provide the flexibility to allow the property owner to be creative in their proposal,” said Kimberley Flowers, deputy director of the planning and zoning department.

The landowner, General Growth Properties Inc., is expected to announce this month a series of public meetings leading to the release of a detailed plan for downtown.

County Executive Ken Ulman recently released the final vision for downtown, intended to guide development during the next 30 years.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The final plan, “Downtown Columbia: A Community Vision,” includes a public square to encourage free speech and additional open space and walkways.

County officials also included a chart mapping out the steps for proposing zoning changes and a master plan, including legislative and public review.

“Overall, we incorporated, where appropriate, the concerns, issues and comments raised during our outreach sessions in the fall,” Flowers said.

But community members remain divided on how much detail the county should include.

Columbia Association Board Chairwoman Barbara Russell said the document still leaves too much up to the developer, and the framework should have included more in road infrastructure, development density and zoning.

“There are a lot of nice things in the plan, but they are not directives to do anything,” Russell said. “They are suggestions for GGP to consider.”

Alan Klein, spokesman for advocacy group Coalition for Columbia’s Downtown, said he also was concerned that General Growth’s plans won’t align with the county’s framework.

Another advocacy group, Bring Back the Vision, was less concerned with the vagueness.

“Once General Growth presents their plan, the entire legislative process begins, and everyone will have ample opportunity to comment,” group spokeswoman Emily Lincoln said.

On the Net

To view a copy of Howard’s “Downtown Columbia: A Community Vision,” visit howardcountymd.gov/DPZ/Community/downtowncolumbia.htm.

smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

11:37 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Columbia residents express concerns about infill proposal"

Lifelong Columbia Resident said:
It is always about the greed. They want to cash in on the older neighborhoods with larger lots. They can build a McMansion on Wilde Lake, or stuff 2-3 homes on a 1/3rd acre lot. It is all about which developer has enough grease for the squeeky wheels in the County Council. I've lived here my entire life and Columbia is turning into a sewer like Baltimore. Our "leaders" are out of touch with reality, they only have special interest in mind when they propose legislation. This not the Columbia vision we bought into in 1968, the elitists are running the show now. And public transportation is the last thing Columbia needs, we have enough problems without importing more. If people can't afford a car what can they buy at the Mall? Look at Owings Mills after the subway went in. Why don't the folks in the county council figure out how to curb crime? Or find productive things for our children to do instead of doing drugs and having babies. Stop filling your pocket with kickbacks and do your j

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:57 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
I used to work for Howard Co., and believe me, the current bus routes aren't full by any means. Therefore, I don't believe there is a need for more public transportation, especially in a town with affluent residents who commute. But I'm sure Ulman would love to funnel money into this anyway.

6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:12 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Funding unclear for Columbia downtown public transit plans"

Examiner Reader said:
Public transportation will not make Columbia Mall (downtown is a joke) more attractive. It will destroy the mall, just look up the road in Reisterstown. If GGP and Wells believe it is needed they are free to reach into their pockets to pay for it. They are not welcome to reach into mine.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 27, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
My vision for Columbia involves a qualified County Executive. Maybe one day Howard County will make that dream come true.

61 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:41 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 12, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
Ulman said he was going to block the tower in Columbia during his campaign. Then, he gets elected and does nothing. I can't trust this guy. His vision for Columbia likely panders to everyone, like he did to get elected.

51 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement