Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
A motion to dismiss the case, along with several others to suppress evidence, could be ruled on by today or Friday.
Isaiah Simmons III stopped breathing and died Jan. 23 after counselors at the Keymar school allegedly held him down for three hours after an outburst and waited nearly 41 minutes to call 911, prosecutors said.
A grand jury indicted the six counselors on misdemeanor reckless endangerment charges in April instead of the felony manslaughter charges that Simmons’ family was pushing for.
Because the grand jury did not indict the counselors on manslaughter, they must not have seen enough evidence of “grossly negligent conduct” leading to Simmons’ death, Scott Rolle, attorney for counselor Shadi Sabbagh, argued in a motion to dismiss.
Rolle and the five other attorneys also say the indictment is too vague to argue against, and that the accusations against the counselors were blurred so that legal actions could be manipulated into illegal ones, according to the motion.
The counselors “did fail to contact emergency services (9-1-1) in a timely manner that created a substantial risk of death and serious physical injury,” according to the charges in the indictment.
Among the six other motions filed by both sides, defense attorneys say any testimony about the alleged three hours of restraint should not be admitted because the grand jury did not indict the counselors on manslaughter charges.
The state countered that allowing the testimony provides essential context for what happened that day because it happened just before the alleged offenses, according to the court records filed by Allan Culver, senior assistant state’s attorney.
In addition, a judge will decide whether Simmons’ criminal record can be brought into the case. Prosecutors filed a motion arguing that his 2006 conviction for armed robbery, which prompted the Department of Juvenile Services to place him in Bowling Brook, would mislead the jury and should be excluded.
The six counselors are to be tried in groups of three in March in Carroll County Circuit Court.
BOWLING BROOK MOTIONS
Defense
» Dismiss
» Exclude restraint evidence
» Exclude other defendants' testimony
» Exclude testimony from a nurse
» Allow jury to travel to Bowling Brook
State
» Exclude Simmons' criminal record
» Exclude grand jury proceedings
msilvestri@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
9:36 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008 re: "O’Malley, team defend sale of former troubled youth facility"
Report as inappropriate
9:03 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "O’Malley, team defend sale of former troubled youth facility"
Report as inappropriate
5:02 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "O’Malley, team defend sale of former troubled youth facility"
Report as inappropriate
2:13 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "O’Malley, team defend sale of former troubled youth facility"
Report as inappropriate
12:10 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "State eyes selling Bowling Brook to Nevada-based Rite of Passage"
Report as inappropriate
10:06 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008
re: "Family of teen killed at Bowling Brook files $207M suit"
Report as inappropriate
3:33 PM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008
re: "Family of teen killed at Bowling Brook files $207M suit"
Report as inappropriate
5:57 AM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008
re: "Family of teen killed at Bowling Brook files $207M suit"
Report as inappropriate
9:29 PM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008
re: "Family of teen killed at Bowling Brook files $207M suit"
Report as inappropriate
9:55 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Bowling Brook staff members turn themselves in to police"
Report as inappropriate
7:07 AM MST on Fri., Jan. 4, 2008
re: "Counselors want charges dismissed"
Report as inappropriate
7:29 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 2, 2008
re: "Counselors want charges dismissed"
Report as inappropriate
5:50 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 2, 2008
re: "Counselors want charges dismissed"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Follow the money. O'Malley is dirty.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Owe'Malley is a liar. He lies about helping working families, he lies about lowering BG&E and he lied about stopping the LNG plant.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No kidding. O'Malley defends his heartless, corrupt, decision.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
johnn said:
remember thease words there coming to get you martin,and soon !and all your flunkys,shelia,shawn malone,miller,and bush
5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
hey, martha! get me rewrite (and no-doz)! At today’s Board of Public Works meeting, the state is proposing to sell the former Bowling Brook juvenile facility where a youth died in custody this past year to a Nevada-based group that runs juvenile facilities
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
this is so stupid. they just want to get rich, there have been other cases but the money being asked for is around 25 million. this is the most amount of mony i have ever seen being asked for over a death in school. if they win this money then it's like they win the lottery. that money could be put to better use than to molify the parents loss.
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
“They stole possibilities. They stole opportunities. They stole his life.” Darn, they stole the chance for him to be released and commit more of the same crimes that put him there. Boo Hoo
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Can we get a little background on the teen? This story is light on details, we need more before forming an opinion. I'm assuming that they didn't just start restraining him for no reason.
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
suing for 1 million for each minute their son suffered? That's so lame, they're just trying to get rich. Losers, they raised the child baldy and expect to get paid for it? No way, they don't deserve that much money.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is a well know peer from the school and I think that they should be charged for killing that boy because they dont listen to people when they say that the stuff that they be doing hurt really bad.It hurt so bad that you feel like your dead,and also they ceature the problem just so they can put you throw that kind of pain.So with that being said I think that they should get atleast 25 to 50 years a peace.But I can say this MR.Dennis was a good person and he would not try to hurt anyone.Thank you for your time.(P.S DO THE RIGHT THING AND PUT THEM AWAY)
7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Independent Marylander said:
The "court of public opinion" is a little short on facts. The Grand Jury indicted based on the facts presented after the investigation of the incident. Soon there will be a trial to determine whether the facts merit a finding of guilt or acquittal. The standard for guilt is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and to a moral certainty." Anything short results in a finding of "not guilty." This is our system...live with it.
67 agree | 71 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
The Undertaker said:
They want the charges dismissed. And I want a million dollars and the girl that I am obsessed with to love me.
80 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
They should be charged with first degree murder.END OF STORY
67 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree