
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Budget projections from the City Controller’s Office indicate The City will be $60 million in the red on overtime spending by the end of the current fiscal year as San Francisco stares square in the face of a nearly $230 million budget deficit that is expected to worsen when the state budget comes out.
As a result of the dire financial forecast, Mayor Gavin Newsom issued an executive directive in December for all city departments to evaluate overtime usage.
“The assignment of overtime should be limited to extraordinary circumstances which cannot be anticipated, or where staffing requirements cannot be met through normal scheduling and assignment of available personnel,” Newsom’s directive read.
Newsom ordered departments to better manage staffing levels, ensure overtime is only assigned by management, use flexible work schedules, consider using compensatory time off instead of overtime pay, and monitor employee sick leave and any potential abuses of it.
The directive came in conjunction with Newsom’s announcement on Dec. 17 that he was canceling the hiring of 1,679 unfilled city positions; that number was reduced to about 640 open positions, according to a list later provided to The Examiner by the Department of Human Resources. The moves are an effort to trim spending heading into 2008.
The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Fire Department, Police Department, Public Health, Public Utilities Commission and Sheriff’s Department are responsible for $52 million of the $60 million excess, but only two of those departments — Public Health and the Sheriff’s Department — will need to go to the Board of Supervisors for supplements to their budgets, according to the Controller’s Office.
Projected deficits for the other four departments can be absorbed by money slated for unfilled positions, according to the Controller’s Office.
The Public Health Department’s projected $8 million overtime deficit is mostly a result of a nursing shortage, and the use of overtime is necessary until more nurses can be hired, according to the Mayor’s Office.
The Sheriff’s Department has a projected $7.8 million overtime deficit due in part to an increasing jail population and two new additional jail pods opened up to accommodate suspects formerly sleeping on the floor, Sheriff Mike Hennessy told The Examiner.
Hennessy said sheriff’s deputies also perform the police function of transporting suspects from district stations to jail, a task that is performed entirely on overtime.

Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:19 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008 re: "Overtime pay part of grim deficit forecast"
Report as inappropriate
2:33 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "Overtime pay part of grim deficit forecast"
Report as inappropriate
2:12 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 2, 2008
re: "Overtime pay part of grim deficit forecast"
Report as inappropriate
9:53 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 2, 2008
re: "Overtime pay part of grim deficit forecast"
Report as inappropriate
3:39 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 18, 2007
re: "Home of the six-figure police officer"
Report as inappropriate
8:51 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007
re: "Superior Court to double staff for D.C. police crackdown on crime; 3,800 will work overtime"
Report as inappropriate
4:41 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007
re: "Officials: OT a solution for short staffs"
Report as inappropriate
10:33 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007
re: "Training and staff shortages lead to rise in expenses, overtime"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I think there is a lot of 'fudging' going on here regarding OT! Are these people really working OT? Is someone actually checking to see if they are working. I mean, to me where and who are these people? I dont' see it in our filthy streets, terrible MUNI service. Cop protection,
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let's see... Close Buster's that serves 150 homeless people to save 150 K , while paying 8000 S.F. employees 62 Million in extra overtime pay... ???
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As far as I'm aware, there are no "secrets" as to the salaries of public employess. Each year their base salaries are published with the respective budget. I believe you can find copies available in your public library and elsewhere.
42 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I work at SF General. What I'd like to know is how you can reduce overtime *and* have a hiring freeze at the same time. The nurses where I work end up having to work mandatory overtime (which they don't want to do) because there aren't enough nurses to cover the hospital 24/7 as is required by the licensing bodies that oversee us (and is necessary for good patient care).
57 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
LDP said:
I wonder if the actual hours paid really equal the actual hours worked? That's the real investigation.
45 agree | 45 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
Did the Council ever pass Tommy Wells' bill to institute "night papering"? If so, has it been implemented? I haven't read anything about it, and that is the measure beat cops have told me they want the most.
72 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Where's the list of all employees and their salaries to go along with this story? Didn't someone say it's public information and publishing it only serves to improve public service? Of course, I'm being sarcastic. There was absolutely no excuse for what they did. But if you're going to publish the names of police officers, why not everyone else in the county too? Let's see how they feel about having their names and salaries made known to their neighbors, families, co-workers, etc. It's one thing to have an idea that someone makes more than you but to have it made public for no good reason and shoved in your face like the Examiner did is inexcusable.
58 agree | 44 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
C.M. Azevedo, Baltimore said:
WHAT IS YOUR POINT WITH ALL THIS???? So, you seem to have a fetish for publishing the salaries and overtime budgets of municiple agencies as you round-robin the state. You seem to do nothing more than point a finger and go "LOOKIE HERE!" So....what is your point? I see no questions asked, no position stated, no social statement other than look at how much money all these folks make. THAT'S JOURNALISM???? Get real. This is tabloid garbage. Good thing I don't have to pay to read this stuff. Sounds like you folks need some 10th grade help. Let me start you off with something to find out, ok? Investigate: How the welfare state and the shifting cultural trend towards Americans refusing to take responsibility for neither themselves nor their children, NOR their actions results in massive overtime budgets for municiple emergency service agencies. That's not the whole ball of wax, but it's a good start! Now how about earning your wages for once???
68 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree