Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - In the early hours of Nov. 7, federal and District of Columbia authorities fanned out to homes around the District and its suburbs. They knocked on doors and hauled off six suspects, including D.C. tax officials Harriette Walters and Diane Gustus. By the end of the day, the District would learn that authorities had busted what they called the largest public corruption scandal in D.C. history.
The tax office scandal has led to 10 arrests, and more might be coming soon. It disgraced Chief Financial Officer Natwar Gandhi, who had until then been spoken to in hushed and reverent tones by D.C.’s political class.
Tens of millions might have been stolen. Authorities are still tracing checks and might have dated the scam to mid-1990. So far, the public has been offered only a glimpse of the riches bought with the allegedly stolen money, but the glimpse has been enough to fire the public’s imagination and outrage: Faberge eggs, Bentleys, Jaguars and beachfront homes in the Caribbean.
The prosecution’s case rests on two middling D.C. bureaucrats. Diane Gustus was a veteran timeserver who plugged along at her work nearly anonymous for three decades and was a few weeks from retirement when she was arrested. The key figure, according to prosecutors, is Harriette Walters, a heavyset, garrulous West Indian who supervised property tax refunds.
Walters had been in the office since 1981, but, unlike Gustus, was well-known by many. She claimed to have inherited money from a rich relative and bragged about her savvy at casinos. And she wasn’t afraid to spread the wealth. Dozens of employees in the tax office, including supervisors, received jewelry, clothing, Wizards tickets and concert seats. Walters even handed out portable safes to store the boodle.
If someone was down on his or her luck, Walters was always glad to lend some money.
Her co-workers called her “Mother Harriette.”
Prosecutors say that the scam relied on a mixture of phony companies and legitimate names. Real estate lawyers would later be surprised to get calls from the FBI or the U.S. Attorney’s Office, asking them why their names were on six-figure checks to companies that either didn’t exist, didn’t own property or weren’t owed refunds.
Sometimes, the names were ludicrous, as in “Ninja Jo” and “Awsome.” Other times, the thieves apparently were hoping for heavenly sanction, christening the fronts with monikers such as “Aurora,” “Bellarmine” — the name of a Roman Catholic saint — “Provident” and “Legna,” which is “Angel” spelled backward.
According to court papers and sources close to the widening investigation, the scam began unraveling around June 18, when Jayrece Turnbull deposited a $410,000 check into a SunTrust bank account at a grocery store in Bowie.
Bank officials were worried about the check. It was made out to “First American Home” and was put in care of “David Fuss, Esq.” The bank put a “hold” on the check and, around June 27, a woman who worked there called Fuss.
Fuss, a real estate lawyer who often obtained refunds for his clients, told the bank clerk that he’d never heard of “First American” and certainly didn’t remember ever receiving a refund that large. The bank clerk asked Fuss what she should do. Fuss suggested she call the D.C. Inspector General’s Office.
Meanwhile, the bogus checks kept rolling out of the tax office. There were often two or three per day, in six-figure increments, most of them marked “hold for pickup.” No one from the finance office apparently questioned why so much money was going out, or where it was heading.
By late June or early July, the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office were poring over bank records and vouchers from the tax office. A month later, Gandhi’s top auditors were called into a meeting with Rod J. Rosenstein, the U.S. attorney for Maryland, and told that there may be thieves in Gandhi’s den.
In the wee hours of Nov. 7, federal authorities raided the homes of Walters, Gustus and several others. According to court records, Walters confessed to running the scheme but wouldn’t say where the money had gone.
The investigation continues.
A who’s who
D.C. tax office scandal
Harriette Walters
Tax office supervisor and alleged mastermind of the scheme
Diane Gustus
Veteran tax office employee, allegedly helped Walters process phony refunds
Jayrece Turnbull
Walters’ niece, allegedly set up accounts for “Legna Home Services”
Richard Walters
Allegedly set up an account for “Helmet Plumbing and Heating”
Ricardo Walters
Allegedly set up an account for “Provident Home Services”
Connie Alexander
Friend of Turnbull, allegedly set up an account for “Aurora Re Enterprises”
Walter Jones
Former Bank of America assistant manager, allegedly laundered millions
Alethia Grooms
Walters’ friend, allegedly laundered money through her real estate company
Patricia Steven
Relative and former Georgetown classmate of Harriette Walters, allegedly set up “Bellarmine” company.
Robert Steven
Estranged husband of Patricia, IRS executive, allegedly helped set up “Bellarmine.”
Got a tip on the tax scandal? Call Bill Myers at 202-459-4956 or e-mail bmyers@dcexaminer.com.



Comments from Examiner Readers
3:01 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "Cordi is new D.C. tax office director"
Report as inappropriate
12:37 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008
re: "Accused mastermind's nephew first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
8:54 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008
re: "Cordi is new D.C. tax office director"
Report as inappropriate
7:30 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008
re: "Cordi is new D.C. tax office director"
Report as inappropriate
2:09 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008
re: "Accused mastermind's nephew first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
2:05 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008
re: "Accused mastermind's nephew first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
5:34 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008
re: "Nephew of alleged mastermind is first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
5:13 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008
re: "Nephew of alleged mastermind is first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
1:37 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 28, 2007
re: "Scandal notes: Unraveling corruption"
Report as inappropriate
6:16 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 22, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
7:59 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
1:42 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
1:40 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "D.C. scandal soils Gandhi’s reputation, may cost his job"
Report as inappropriate
11:21 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
6:56 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
5:09 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "Police: Saintly name belies alleged role in scandal"
Report as inappropriate
12:22 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007
re: "Tax scandal may date to '90"
Report as inappropriate
11:42 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007
re: "Tax scandal may date to '90"
Report as inappropriate
11:13 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007
re: "D.C. scandal soils Gandhi’s reputation, may cost his job"
Report as inappropriate
7:40 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007
re: "D.C. scandal soils Gandhi’s reputation, may cost his job"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Phil Appelbaum is not the issue -- he is one of the honest managers in the DC real property office actually following the rules and regulations. It isn't an issue of black vs. white. Who are the other 10 people fired from the DC tax office since the case broke, and why haven't we been told who they are? The District should stop stonewalling! Who else in management are they trying to protect in auditing, revenue accounting, and the Treasury? Why hasn't the public been told the whole story?
82 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'd like to know more about him and all of the thieves as a whole.
69 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Now fire Applebaum who is in on the corruption and Ghandi-all a bunch of crooks-looks like more of a cover-up. Any insite on the Wilkes Artis law firm and all the money they steal? Applebaum is buddy buddy with Stanley Fineman-travels with him, etc.-doles out lots of money. Stop arresting black people and look into the whites!!!
66 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joe Jena said:
This incident shows that proper controls were not in place. Not for one year, not for 5 years, but for 17 years. The person in charge was incompetent and it's amazing he's now being allowed to hire others. And where did he hire him from? The corrupt state of Maryland of course.
62 agree | 61 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
These people just gotta have the life of luxury without working for it. What you do in the dark will always come to light. I can't believe that old woman was that dum, and those that followed her, you should be locked up. You have starving children out here, did you give any of the money to them, you pothethic people. God will reveal ugly things when you are not doing the right thing. Smiling in peoples face every day, and doing dirt. What a shame.
70 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Burn them all, how stupid can you be. Every company has to do an audit sooner or later to see where their funds are going. Crime does not pay.
75 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why can't DC just steal the tradition way like MD does - just keep increasing taxes until it hurts?
48 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How come Phil Applebaum is now running the DC Tax office? Have people investigated him and his ties to everyone?
39 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
rentamob said:
and how much time will they get?
87 agree | 51 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
can we see a picture of him, too?
89 agree | 80 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why are they protecting Gandhi? The questions should be aimed at Tom Davis, the master, Anthony Williams, the law breaker, and Jack Evans, the protector....
100 agree | 87 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION said:
It anyone thinks that this storying is surprising or outragious, just you wait. You ain't seen nothing yet!!
95 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT said:
It's just a matter of time. Dr. Gandhi, whether involved or not, will be leaving us soon. But don't worry, he's almost 70 and perhaps he will start a consulting firm. He has really screwed up and he knows it. I am looking forward to them uncovering the real story!
69 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
GAB said:
I want to know what the Criminal Investigation Division of the IRS is saying to Steven. Since they go in with the attitude "you're guilty of something", even if you're not, it would be instructive to see what happens when they come up against someone who really is guilty!
90 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately this is only the tip of the iceberg! 11 checks totaling $2.8 million in fraudulent checks routed to Bellarmine dating back to 1999. Someone is also sleeping at the Bank of America. Oh yeah -- I ask the question: once we let the cat out of the bag, can we stuff it back in?
99 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joe Jena said:
Gandhi is like the head of Enron. Why are they protecting him?
60 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Patent this game said:
What is happening is nothing but a extreme-version of the monoply game...think about it every time you pass go you collect 5k or more for that matter. As for Ghandi...ain't nothing wrong for asking for a 92k raise...it just the thought they were contemplating in given him one. You know that saying either you pay now or you pay later...with the word "severly" being added for good measure LOL!!!
75 agree | 75 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How Gandhi (the CFO) could even conceivably accept a $92,000 per year pay raise is beyond me. He has been there too long and outlived his usefulness, like Joe Gibbs. Throw the bum out!
81 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Angry Citizen said:
Hit the road, Nat. And don'tcha come back!
85 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Time to fire him and let the FBI investigate and chage him and his friends.
88 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree