Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Three bags of hollow-point bullets and $20,000 in cash were also found at the home of Robert Chan, an alleged co-conspirator of Jew, according to FBI documents, who is now battling federal extortion charges.
The latest details surrounding the much-followed legal wrangling of the rookie supervisor come from a federal application and affidavit for a search warrant, in addition to the subsequent May 18 search warrant, which U.S. District Judge Susan Illston unsealed at the request of federal prosecutors.
Jew has been accused of extorting up to $80,000 in cash bribes from owners of Quickly tapioca drink shop franchises and of accepting in cash $40,000 as partial payment.
During the FBI’s May 18 raid of five properties, agents seized $10,000 in cash from Jew’s Burlingame home and a “stack of one hundred dollar bills totaling $20,000 U.S. dollars” from consultant Chan’s Newhall Street residence and home business, the unsealed documents show.
Also seized from Chan’s home were three bags of “various manufacturers hollow point ammunition,” a federal agent noted in the documents.
According to Jew, he referred local tapioca drink shop owners to Chan as someone who could handle their business permitting problems. Jew said he accepted $40,000 cash on behalf of Chan, then asked for half to spend on community needs.
In the federal complaint against Jew, a person is identified only as “co-conspirator No. 1.” In the earlier documents, which were filed before the Sept. 20 complaint, the moniker “co-conspirator” is not used, but Robert Chan’s name is.
Chan’s attorney James Bustamante said that “the hollow-points are of no consequence and it’s not part of the investigation.”
Bustamante said that the FBI raid “revealed nothing that placed my client doing anything illegal; quite the contrary” and said that “my client was not the target of the investigation.”
Jew’s attorney Stuart Hanlon referred questions about the bullets to Chan, but said “Jew has been charged of a lot of things but not charged of anything violent.”
“There are no guns, there’s no violence here,” he said.
Hanlon said that Chan, who has not been charged with a crime, is “co-operating” with federal
authorities.
Hanlon just took over the federal case last week after Jew’s initial defense attorney bowed out. He said he is reviewing “tapes and videos” from when the FBI had Jew under surveillance.
Federal agents apparently requested a search warrant only after Jew found out he was being tailed. Jew had contacted the San Francisco Police Department and asked them to run the license plates of cars following him. The local police alerted the FBI to Jew’s request on May 17.
Jew is also facing three other legal battles. The district attorney has charged Jew with nine felonies, accusing him of lying about where he lived to run for office, the city attorney has filed a civil lawsuit against Jew to oust him from office for allegedly violating city residency requirements and The City is also holding misconduct proceedings that could result in his permanent removal from office.
Hanlon said that “either the cases go to trial or there is a global resolution on all of them.”
That could be Jew resigning and then resolving the criminal cases “in a way everyone is satisfied,” he said.
Jew’s next scheduled court appearance is Jan. 18 in federal court.
jsabatini@examiner.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
12:07 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 3, 2008 re: "Ed Jew’s federal trial set for July"
Report as inappropriate
10:48 AM MST on Sun., Apr. 20, 2008
re: "Ed Jew started property transfers as charges loomed"
Report as inappropriate
9:06 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008
re: "Ed Jew started property transfers as charges loomed"
Report as inappropriate
12:21 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 26, 2008
re: "Jew's attorney alleges 'conflict of interest' in case"
Report as inappropriate
10:11 AM MST on Sat., Jan. 26, 2008
re: "Jew's attorney alleges 'conflict of interest' in case"
Report as inappropriate
1:20 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "Ed Jew FBI raid unsealed"
Report as inappropriate
1:02 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "Ed Jew FBI raid unsealed"
Report as inappropriate
12:20 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "Ed Jew FBI raid unsealed"
Report as inappropriate
9:23 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "Ed Jew’s attorney certain he can win"
Report as inappropriate
4:50 PM MST on Sat., Dec. 15, 2007
re: "Ed Jew drops another attorney"
Report as inappropriate
7:54 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 1, 2007
re: "Ed Jew’s attorney certain he can win"
Report as inappropriate
6:12 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 27, 2007
re: "Ed Jew’s attorney certain he can win"
Report as inappropriate
9:00 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 27, 2007
re: "Ed Jew’s attorney certain he can win against the state"
Report as inappropriate
8:05 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Ed Jew’s attorney asks for more time"
Report as inappropriate
7:14 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Ed Jew’s attorney asks for more time"
Report as inappropriate
4:50 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Ed Jew’s attorney asks for more time"
Report as inappropriate
1:57 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 26, 2007
re: "Ed Jew’s attorney asks for more time"
Report as inappropriate
10:35 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 7, 2007
re: "Ed Jew pleads not guilty"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 7, 2007
re: "Ed Jew pleads not guilty"
Report as inappropriate
6:21 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 6, 2007
re: "Protesters, supporters rally at Jew's hearing"
Report as inappropriate
2:23 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 21, 2007
re: "Protesters, supporters rally at Jew's hearing"
Report as inappropriate
10:32 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007
re: "Protesters, supporters rally at Jew's hearing"
Report as inappropriate
10:10 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007
re: "Protesters, supporters rally at Jew's hearing"
Report as inappropriate
6:47 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007
re: "Protesters, supporters rally at Jew's hearing"
Report as inappropriate
6:46 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007
re: "Jew pleads not guilty to nine felony charges"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Jew is just not lucky and got busted.
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Sweet Melissa said:
Ed Jew withdrew his motion for federal funds that day this story came out. Coincidence?
7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
While he was still in office, Mr. Jew's website for the most part became a plea for his legal defense fund (Doug Comstock treasurer). How much was collected? Why does the masthead of the site still list him as supervisor of district 4. Mr. Sabatini the article is imcomplete - you have more work to do.
7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let me get this straight. Yee (hates Jew because he won't play by SF machine back-room rules) asks lawyer with name of ancient slop food (please sir, may I have some more?) to go back channel to FBI in hopes of taking out the man who was never supposed to win office in our rigged city. Then Oatmeal and mash lawyer ends up representing Ed Jew without telling him that it was he that went to FBI in 1st place at behest of Jew's political enemy? Obama better watch out is all I can say. In the politics (demo or repub) of our times, you play be their rules (not the people's rules) or they go after you.
82 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You do the crime you do the time Ed. Stop sniveling and take your punishment like a man!!
86 agree | 91 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Carl said:
hang in there ed
110 agree | 103 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The color of justice is green, ed will walk.
99 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Josh Sabatini should win a Pulitzer. Ha! In your face, Chronicle!
114 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
carmen chu is way smarter and better than ed jew!
100 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
SFnativeson said:
If Ed can't afford the multiple attorneys, maybe he ought to consider selling his house in Burlingame and asking his dad if he can REALLY move into that house in the Sunset.
110 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Lawyer Hanlon says poor Ed's case is "complex"...hmmm, let's review; Ed and family live in Burlingame. Ed filled out paperwork claiming to live in The City to win a $100,000+ a year job. Ed lied. Ed got caught. Gee, I ain't no lawyer, but that don't seem so "complex" to me.
114 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
Ed Jew will win the residency case. The city charter is too ambiguous about the requirement and should be rewritten. It's a waste of taxpayer dollars pursuing the "worst kept secret in SF politics".
130 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
good old amercian justice being dropped in this case, if I'm ed I'd pray I never get any of these "judgers without facts" on my jury, Ed will walk I'd bet it he has the best lawyer Staurt Hanlon can run circles around anyone in teh DA office including th DA hersef Hanlon is the very best SF has to offer yo ucan see the difference between him and Fazio already, only a fool will rush to trial, ED WILL WALK
155 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
all Ed Jew has to do is to get one of those San Francisco ID Cards. If Illegal immigrants can get one, then how about a man who was born, raised and owns a business in San Francisco.
129 agree | 116 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ed wanted one of his other trials to be speedy. He's hasn't decided about this one yet.
129 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What happen to the change of venue? His attorney is nuts. “But I’m convinced Mr. Jew will be able to get a fair trial” in San Francisco. Uh where are you going to find anyone in the city that has not heard of this case? What people live in cave or under a rock?
115 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Did Ed Jew want a speedy trial? I don't call this a speedy trial.
119 agree | 114 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Poor Ed Jew What to do? Fazio left him Will Steve Gruel, too? No argument yet For defense 'I didn't do it' Won't mend the fence He took the money Can't give it back Must pay the price Of a political hack The love of money That powerful greed The downfall of many That too few heed Poor Ed Jew What will he do? The State, The Feds, The City,Too, All want him in court To answer the charges I'd keep my eye On the China-bound barges Is he really so blind As not to see The writing on the wall What his future will be? Three squares a day Prison dungarees Poor Ed Jew Off to prison, if you please.
146 agree | 149 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Attorney Gruel says Ed Jew didn't do it but he can't "give out details of defense arguments". Well, of course not...he and Ed haven't finished making them up yet.
143 agree | 148 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
That’s what happens when you disagree with the supervisors of San Francisco and defend free speech - serves him right...
165 agree | 140 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
don't play the race card, what a cop out. Ed Jew still doesn't live in his Sunset house you moron!
164 agree | 177 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Well, if Ed Jew committed a crime, I guess 12,000,000 "ILLEGALS" must go back to where they came from too !
177 agree | 176 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
haf devil said:
you just don't like yellow people with the white power to lie and hopefully get away with it.
170 agree | 173 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ed Jew! Get out of here! Resign! Quit! Leave!
176 agree | 177 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
nail the sucker...
186 agree | 175 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree