CHANGE MY LOCATION
Local
California News
Multimedia News
Cops: Name belies alleged role in scam
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - For nearly a decade, six-figure checks were cut, picked up and cashed by representatives of a cluster of businesses using the name of a Catholic saint named Bellarmine.
On Thursday, federal officials said the alleged owners of those companies were no angels.
As first reported by The Examiner in early November, “Bellarmine” is a name that recurs throughout the largest public corruption scandal in city history.
Authorities alleged in charging documents that Robert O. and Patricia Anne Steven opened at least two Bank of America accounts for “Bellarmine Designs” on which they were each signatories. The company would net about $2.8 million in phony tax refunds in the unholy scheme, authorities alleged.
The earliest known payment to Bellarmine dates to July 1, 1999, when tax officials wrote a $113,000 check to “Bellarmine Corporation,” left for pickup at the tax office in the care of Prem Malkani.
Malkani, a retired finance officer with the Air Line Pilots Association, said the payment “was entirely false.”
“I have no association with any company or business of that name,” he told The Examiner.
Through the next several years, authorities alleged, “Bellarmine” would be associated with at least 11 payments, including a June 9, 2000, check for more than $181,000, made out to “Bellarmine Associates” and put in care of real estate lawyer Jeffrey Nadel.
“Never heard of them,” Nadel told The Examiner.
The tax scam now dates back to at least 1990 and has involved such phony companies as “Legna” and “Provident Home Services.”
Robert Bellarmine was a Roman Catholic scholar who was canonized by his church and is the patron saint of converts studying church rites. In court Thursday, Patricia Steven told the judge she spells her middle name “the Catholic way.”
Got a tip on the tax scandal? Call Bill Myers at 202-459-4956 or e-mail bmyers@dcexaminer.com
Comments from Examiner Readers
3:01 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "Cordi is new D.C. tax office director"
Report as inappropriate
12:37 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008
re: "Accused mastermind's nephew first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
8:54 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008
re: "Cordi is new D.C. tax office director"
Report as inappropriate
7:30 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008
re: "Cordi is new D.C. tax office director"
Report as inappropriate
2:09 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008
re: "Accused mastermind's nephew first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
2:05 PM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008
re: "Accused mastermind's nephew first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
5:34 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008
re: "Nephew of alleged mastermind is first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
5:13 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 8, 2008
re: "Nephew of alleged mastermind is first indicted in tax fraud case"
Report as inappropriate
1:37 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 28, 2007
re: "Scandal notes: Unraveling corruption"
Report as inappropriate
6:16 AM MST on Sat., Dec. 22, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
7:59 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
1:42 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
1:40 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "D.C. scandal soils Gandhi’s reputation, may cost his job"
Report as inappropriate
11:21 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
6:56 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "IRS official and wife charged in widening web of tax scam"
Report as inappropriate
5:09 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007
re: "Police: Saintly name belies alleged role in scandal"
Report as inappropriate
12:22 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007
re: "Tax scandal may date to '90"
Report as inappropriate
11:42 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007
re: "Tax scandal may date to '90"
Report as inappropriate
11:13 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007
re: "D.C. scandal soils Gandhi’s reputation, may cost his job"
Report as inappropriate
7:40 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007
re: "D.C. scandal soils Gandhi’s reputation, may cost his job"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Phil Appelbaum is not the issue -- he is one of the honest managers in the DC real property office actually following the rules and regulations. It isn't an issue of black vs. white. Who are the other 10 people fired from the DC tax office since the case broke, and why haven't we been told who they are? The District should stop stonewalling! Who else in management are they trying to protect in auditing, revenue accounting, and the Treasury? Why hasn't the public been told the whole story?
82 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'd like to know more about him and all of the thieves as a whole.
69 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Now fire Applebaum who is in on the corruption and Ghandi-all a bunch of crooks-looks like more of a cover-up. Any insite on the Wilkes Artis law firm and all the money they steal? Applebaum is buddy buddy with Stanley Fineman-travels with him, etc.-doles out lots of money. Stop arresting black people and look into the whites!!!
66 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joe Jena said:
This incident shows that proper controls were not in place. Not for one year, not for 5 years, but for 17 years. The person in charge was incompetent and it's amazing he's now being allowed to hire others. And where did he hire him from? The corrupt state of Maryland of course.
62 agree | 61 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
These people just gotta have the life of luxury without working for it. What you do in the dark will always come to light. I can't believe that old woman was that dum, and those that followed her, you should be locked up. You have starving children out here, did you give any of the money to them, you pothethic people. God will reveal ugly things when you are not doing the right thing. Smiling in peoples face every day, and doing dirt. What a shame.
70 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Burn them all, how stupid can you be. Every company has to do an audit sooner or later to see where their funds are going. Crime does not pay.
75 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why can't DC just steal the tradition way like MD does - just keep increasing taxes until it hurts?
48 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How come Phil Applebaum is now running the DC Tax office? Have people investigated him and his ties to everyone?
39 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
rentamob said:
and how much time will they get?
87 agree | 51 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
can we see a picture of him, too?
89 agree | 80 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why are they protecting Gandhi? The questions should be aimed at Tom Davis, the master, Anthony Williams, the law breaker, and Jack Evans, the protector....
100 agree | 87 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION said:
It anyone thinks that this storying is surprising or outragious, just you wait. You ain't seen nothing yet!!
95 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT said:
It's just a matter of time. Dr. Gandhi, whether involved or not, will be leaving us soon. But don't worry, he's almost 70 and perhaps he will start a consulting firm. He has really screwed up and he knows it. I am looking forward to them uncovering the real story!
69 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
GAB said:
I want to know what the Criminal Investigation Division of the IRS is saying to Steven. Since they go in with the attitude "you're guilty of something", even if you're not, it would be instructive to see what happens when they come up against someone who really is guilty!
90 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately this is only the tip of the iceberg! 11 checks totaling $2.8 million in fraudulent checks routed to Bellarmine dating back to 1999. Someone is also sleeping at the Bank of America. Oh yeah -- I ask the question: once we let the cat out of the bag, can we stuff it back in?
99 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joe Jena said:
Gandhi is like the head of Enron. Why are they protecting him?
60 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Patent this game said:
What is happening is nothing but a extreme-version of the monoply game...think about it every time you pass go you collect 5k or more for that matter. As for Ghandi...ain't nothing wrong for asking for a 92k raise...it just the thought they were contemplating in given him one. You know that saying either you pay now or you pay later...with the word "severly" being added for good measure LOL!!!
75 agree | 75 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How Gandhi (the CFO) could even conceivably accept a $92,000 per year pay raise is beyond me. He has been there too long and outlived his usefulness, like Joe Gibbs. Throw the bum out!
81 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Angry Citizen said:
Hit the road, Nat. And don'tcha come back!
85 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Time to fire him and let the FBI investigate and chage him and his friends.
88 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree