CHANGE MY LOCATION
Local
California News
Multimedia News
County to hear from public on special district
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The public will get the chance to weigh in on Montgomery County’s controversial use of special tax districts to pay for infrastructure.
A hearing on a resolution proposed by Council President Mike Knapp to get rid of a special tax that has been preliminarily approved for Clarksburg Town Center, off Interstate 270 in northwestern Montgomery, has been set for Jan. 15.
A separate hearing, over a bill proposed by Councilwoman Duchy Trachtenberg that would create more oversight and improve resident notification of any developer’s desire to create a special district, is also planned Jan. 15.
“My mind-set is to refine the process and to improve the notice, improve the coordination and oversight,” Trachtenberg, who chairs the committee that is overseeing legislation dealing with development districts, said Wednesday.
Use of special tax districts, which are created through a multi-step process, became controversial in 2005.
That’s when Clarksburg Town Center residents, who had already uncovered a series of building irregularities, complained they were not properly notified that they could be charged a $2,000 tax on top of other county taxes when they began moving in.
The county’s Office of Legislative Oversight issued a report in September that says the council should re-evaluate its policies for establishing the special districts, though it found Clarksburg’s district was created legally.
That report appears to have split the council. Some members, including Knapp, have said the Town Center residents shouldn’t be forced to pay the tax. Others, including Trachtenberg, disagree.
“I think that given the enormity of the project, given the schedule at hand, the enormous problems that the county is going to have around investments and infrastructure, we would not be serving the community well,” Trachtenberg said.
cmabeus@dcexaminer.com
Comments from Examiner Readers
10:17 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Leggett says property tax cuts only help businesses, wealthy"
Report as inappropriate
5:28 AM MST on Tue., May. 13, 2008
re: "Most council members favor cut to property tax"
Report as inappropriate
12:18 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 15, 2008
re: "Council may kill Montgomery property tax hike"
Report as inappropriate
10:23 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "Anti-tax signs disappear before increase proposed"
Report as inappropriate
1:02 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "Montgomery balks at tax increase for millionaires"
Report as inappropriate
6:30 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 22, 2008
re: "Anti-tax signs disappear before increase proposed"
Report as inappropriate
5:50 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 22, 2008
re: "Anti-tax signs disappear before increase proposed"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 21, 2008
re: "Anti-tax signs disappear before increase proposed"
Report as inappropriate
5:54 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008
re: "Legislation would give charter counties OK to raise property taxes above limit"
Report as inappropriate
7:56 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 7, 2007
re: "Montgomery home sellers must disclose future tax"
Report as inappropriate
7:07 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007
re: "Petition seeks vote to make property tax hikes tougher"
Report as inappropriate
7:04 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007
re: "Petition seeks vote to make property tax hikes tougher"
Report as inappropriate
Robin Ficker, Broker Robin Realty said:
Don't use the words, "property tax cut," in Montgomery County. Leggett has proposed the largest property tax increase in 20 years. Sticking to the charter limit will allow a 3.6% increase in property tax revenues. That should be enough. We shall see if Council members Tratchenberg and Andrews were serious when they spoke of sticking to the charter property tax limit. If they vote to exceed the limit, it will make passage of our November ballot question making it more difficult to exceed the charter property tax limit more likely.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gazette Reader (and Examiner, too) said:
The council committee tax plan will result in a MUCH larger tax increase for the average homeowner (where their home is worth under about $500,000) then the Leggett plan. Older people and those who live in smaller condos and townhomes will bear the greater brunt of the increase than the people who live in million dollar homes. That fact that is exposed by this article, and their is no hiding from it.
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Robin Ficker, Broker Robin Realty said:
The council is waiting for the results of the special election in District 4 to see what to do. Mark Fennel is running for County Council and Property Tax Relief. He opposes Leggett's biggest proposed property tax increase in 20 years, has pledged to vote against exceeding the charter property tax limit and supports our November ballot question which makes it more difficult to exceed the charter property tax limit. C
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Last summer, Help Save Maryland filed a Freedom of Information” request with Montgomery County Executive Ike Leggett and County Council President Mike Knapp. Our request covered 5 years worth of official documents concerning Montgomery County and all taxpayer funding for the illegal alien support group CASA of Maryland – Day Laborer Centers, Training, Education, Outreach, Health Care, Legal Services and more, all County funded activities advertised on CASA’s web site. Leggett responded and supplied Help Save Maryland with THREE pieces of paper; Knapp had ZERO. Judicial Watch, a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and law, came to the rescue. Judicial Watch re-filed the request and guess what, they received boxes of documents from multiple parts of the Montgomery County Government regarding CASA of Maryland.
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Robin Ficker Broker Robin Realty said:
Knapp and Leggett are trying to push through the biggest property tax increase in 20 years. When the state budget "deficit" in a budget that was 8.5% larger than last year was proposed, Leggett proposed raising taxes. He got what he wanted. Then he said he got too much of what he wanted. Now he is trying to raise the gas tax while gasoline is headed to $4 a gallon. Is he nuts?
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mark D. Fennel, County Council Candidate said:
For goodness sakes, three of the signs taken on seperate occasions, by the Montgomery County Government, was displayed in the yard of Tommy Le, who lives along that stretch. He's a candidate for Montgomery County Board of Education, fine man, and political ally.
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mark D. Fennel, County Council Candidate said:
When I caught the county employee, he said each house needed a permit to have a sign. He also said, the signs were to big for permits, and that he could fine me $500 per house for all 26 houses,($1,300). NONE OF THIS WAS TRUE. He asked to see my identification. I asked for them back from his truck, he said no. ACLU Help! As I drove off, he said, "And some of them were in the right of way." Some of them? Today, Montgomery County's spin is all of them were in the right of way. Tragically, they tossed many of them in Montgomery County's landfill. I told permitting services, that donations from senior citizens who are being driven out of their homes due to high property taxes helped to pay for those signs -- they shrugged. VOTE FENNEL FOR COUNTY COUNCIL AND PROPERTY TAX RELIEF APRIL 15 AND MAY 13
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Robin Ficker, Broker Robin Realty said:
All these signs were put up on the homes of homeowners with the permission of the homeowners. None was put in the right of way. We caught the county employee surreptitiously taking down the signs when he was doing it for the fifth time, after we had filed two police reports. Vote for Fennel for County Council and Property Tax Relief in the April 15 special election.
2 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Robin Ficker, Broker Robin Realty said:
We have a ballot question on the 2008 ballot in Montgomery County. It would make it more difficult to exceed the county property tax limit, not easier. This ballot question will pass.
31 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Tony Sharpe said:
I read your article about the Council's decision to have sellers estimate taxes. What a crock. Why don't they make it easy and keep the law simple and say that taxes cannot be increased more than 10% a year. Why does it matter if the property changes hands! This is just another example of the county being greeeeedy taking advantage of the purchasers of real estate. The county should get their hands out of the purchasers pockets. Taxes are way too high the way it is. This will only hamper the already hurting market. Thanks.
56 agree | 48 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Control spending said:
Monkey County needs to control spending, not try to take our homes.
77 agree | 67 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Taxed out said:
After all the O'Malley tax increases, I can't believe the council covets out home equity!
53 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree