California News

Multimedia News

Female sluggers on the court and stump
20 photos
Russia's Vera Dushevina returns a shot to Ser...
LA and Philly battle for the pennant
20 photos
Justin Maiuro of Mantua, NJ, shows off his Ph...
PETA gets naked and bloody again
16 photos
Partially clothed protesters seen with taped ...
Cute dogs, bulls and a green polar bear
15 photos
Dogs wait in line to be blessed during a bles...
High School Musical 3 Debate: Tisdale vs. Hudgens
20 photos
U.S. actress Ashley Tisdale arrives for the B...

Half Moon Bay readies appeal of $36M verdict

Dec 19, 2007 3:00 AM (297 days ago) by Tamara Barak Aparton, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: HALF MOON BAY, Calif.

HALF MOON BAY, Calif. (Map, News) - Half Moon Bay officials plan to appeal a $36.8 million judgment threatening to cripple city services, Mayor Bonnie McClung announced at Tuesday’s City Council meeting.

“We are united in our position at this point that this is our best course of action,” McClung said.

At the meeting, council members voted to retain an appellate law firm and a financial consultant to advise them how to tackle the judgment — which is more than three times larger than the city’s $10 million operating budget.

According to City Manager Marcia Raines, council members met with financial and legal experts during lengthy closed sessions Dec. 7 and 12. Legal firm Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe and financial consultant Piper Jaffray were both asked to submit proposals after offering “invaluable free advice and information,” according to Raines.

This story continues below
Advertisement

At Tuesday’s meeting, John Knox, a partner in the appellate law firm, said he believes the judge’s ruling on the lawsuit was erroneous and there is sufficient reason to appeal.

If the city goes through with its appeal, the required bond would mean significant budget cuts to parks, streets, libraries and other city services. City Council members say the worst-case scenario — that the city itself is dissolved — remains unlikely.

Most residents who packed Tuesday’s meeting said they were supportive of the decision to appeal, though some pleaded with council members to negotiate with the developer.

Resident Ozzie Montero expressed anger at the council for the city’s predicament.

“This was the result of many years of thoughtless and reckless government,” he said.

The shocking blow was delivered Nov. 28 by the Federal District Court of California, which ruled the city was responsible for creating delicate wetlands on Joyce Yamagiwa’s property by adding storm drain improvements.

Yamagiwa, a trustee for developer Charles Keenan, purchased the property, known as Beachwood, for $1 million in 1993. The existence of wetlands created a series of permit problems that prevented Keenan’s plan to turn the 24 acres into an 83-unit subdivision.

tbarak@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

There are no comments available.
Advertisement