Environmentalists’ input sought tonight to change recycling bill
Article History
There are updates to this article.

Annapolis (Map, News) - Less than a month after the Annapolis City Council voted to replace his plastic bag ban with a tempered environmental bill, a city council alderman is calling for public support in once again amending the bill.

“I hope anyone with any input on this legislation will be there, because this is the right thing to do,” said Alderman Sam Shropshire, D-Ward 7, who is hoping environmentalists who backed his bag ban will return to speak at the City Council meeting tonight.

“There is no value in this bill without measurable objectives. We need to amend this bill so we can see changes in eight to nine months.”

The revised bill, which was introduced by Annapolis Mayor Ellen Moyer, encourages residents and business owners “to use reusable and recyclable materials and to purchase goods from companies that practice energy use reduction and sequestration of carbon dioxide.”

The bill also establishes an Environmental Review Committee to evaluate the city’s existing environmental policies to “assure that its policies and procedures foster the use of materials that are compostable, recyclable, and reusable,” according to the bill.

But Shropshire says he wants clear goals, specifically targeting plastic bags and the pollution they cause.

Moyer could not be reached for comment.

The public may speak about the revised bill tonight at the public hearing and propose ideas for the legislation.

Shropshire said he plans to introduce several amendments and put the bill’s focus back on plastic bags, with specific goals such as reducing plastic bag use by 20 to 30 percent in the next nine months. He also wants to see an increase in the number of grocery stores selling or distributing reusable bags.

“It should be an interesting evening,” he said.

Previous meetings about the bag ban have attracted nationwide attention from environmentalists who tout reasons for eliminating their use, such as dangers to marine life. But the bill was also met with a backlash from retailers and business owners, who say plastic bags are cheaper and more user-friendly.

The meeting is at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall.

cpeirce@baltimoreexaminer.com

People who read this also read:

Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

5:35 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Annapolis’ proposed plastic bag ban sparks controversy"

Examiner Reader said:
""" Look at the mounting litter and destruction humans' "freedom of choice" has brought to the environment""" -So am I right in assuming that you would glady give up your freedom of choice, and allow the government to make all of your decisions in order to protect the environment? When will we, as a nation, stop allowing the government to over-regulate every miniscule aspect of our lives? Plastic bags are bad for the environment? Who cares? What about important issues like health care, education, our broken tax code?

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:53 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Baltimore City's plastic bag ban dead, for now"

Examiner Reader said:
What are we dog owners going to do if there is a ban on plastic bags? After all, when one walks his or her little dog one needs to carry a scooper and a plastic bag since the law demands it. Any suggestions? Oh, forget about paper bags since paper bags leak.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:19 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Baltimore City's plastic bag ban dead, for now"

African American Woman said:
Using paper or plastic both have a negative affect on the environment. What you should be promoting is recycling. One of the ways we can work on keeping the city clean is to bring back the clean block contest they used to have back in the late 60’s and early 70’s but keep it going all year long. The city could also put recycling bins on the corners and classrooms instead of trash cans that you dump anything into.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:11 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Baltimore City's plastic bag ban dead, for now"

JF said:
"I think the concept is a good concept, but I think the timing happens to be off,” said District 2 Councilman Nicholas D’Adamo Jr. “And keep in mind, bags don’t litter. People do.” What a crock of...the timing is off??? WTH does that mean? Bags don't litter, people do??? Who cares? The problem is plastic! Plastic does not disintegrate into nothing - paper does. This is very disappointing - especially given that 11 of 14 council people voted it down. These people obviously don't represent their non-business voters.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:45 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Supermarket plastic bag ban in Baltimore advances"

Examiner Reader said:
You liberals make me laugh , and now we are going to use the trees again!Yes it is a big deal!

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:42 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Supermarket plastic bag ban in Baltimore advances"

Examiner Reader said:
I'm gonna buy blue bags from a private manufacturer on the net and still use them,HA HA!

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:08 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Supermarket plastic bag ban in Baltimore advances"

Examiner Reader said:
Whatever happened to global warming and saving trees? Do the tree huggers know about this proposal? Maybe it would be better if city residents just stopped throwing trash everywhere.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:16 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Supermarket plastic bag ban in Baltimore advances"

Workin Stiff said:
Way to go Baltimore City Council!! With the city falling apart all around and the residents leaving by the bus load the council tackles the important job -- plastic bags. What a laughing stock the city council is, rampant crime, embarrassingly bad schools, grotesquely high property taxes, a revolving door justice system and recycling trash bags is being discussed.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:44 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Supermarket plastic bag ban in Baltimore advances"

Examiner Reader said:
Hey you liberals ! What has happen that you are not saving the trees? This is why we went to plastic , don't you remember? I do!

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:28 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Supermarket plastic bag ban in Baltimore advances"

Examiner Reader said:
Plastic bags do not pollute ! People do.Now we are going to see paper bags all over the place!

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:41 PM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Plastic bags on their way out of The City"

Libidiot said:
They need to print "Recycle this Bag" in Chinese and Spanish on every plastic bag

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:54 PM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Plastic bags on their way out of The City"

gerryx21dlr said:
I worked for Walgreens in Santa Rosa where the manager had to put a plastic bag recycle bin near the register. I found out that he told his staff just to throw out the accumulated bags alsong with the regular trash. OMG! I decided to take responsibilty and took the full bin of bags to Safeway's recycling area without telling my manager. If Walgreens could, they would lobby against using paper over plastic, citing extra costs and not really caring about the environment, wildlife, etc. Walgreens is not a good company.

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:21 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Plastic bags on their way out of The City"

Examiner Reader said:
I do not often agree with the Supervisors but this time i do. Next to fast food trash plastic bags are all over the place and I have to pick them up because the city does not. How about charging fast food vendors a clean up fee and use the fee to employ people (supervised of course) to pick up the trash.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Annapolis’ proposed plastic bag ban sparks controversy"

Pizza said:
It is not that difficult to use a reuseable bag. Clearly plastic bags are not being recycled - look at the streets in the city. Maybe we should grow up and take some responsibility for ourselves and stop whining that we're inconvenienced by environmentalists.

4 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:16 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Business owners blast plan for bottle deposit, plastic bag ban"

Examiner Reader said:
Don't use paper bags because trees have to be killed to make them. Now don't use plastic. It's for the kids. It's for the kids. I'm so sick of hearing that. Let's stop living so we don't disrupt the environment.

3 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:54 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Business owners blast plan for bottle deposit, plastic bag ban"

Examiner Reader said:
Smiley face fascists like James Kraft continue to use “green” legislation to increase government’s power to regulate every human activity. The functionally illiterate voters in the City will welcome this fascist legislation and then whine for more government welfare when the Baltimore City economy takes another hit.

7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:39 PM MST on Sun., Mar. 9, 2008 re: "Lawmakers consider ban on plastic bags"

Student said:
The next generation will not complain about purchase tax or plastic old bags! Sell the trees for furniture not bags. Recycle!

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:57 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 8, 2008 re: "Lawmakers consider ban on plastic bags"

Examiner Reader said:
Look we can't even keep criminals off the streets what makes them think we can stop people from using plastic bags. Don't we have better stuff to worrie about than plastic bags? like the fall of Maryland due to O'ididnothingforthestatemalley.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:08 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 8, 2008 re: "Alderman seeks to ban bags"

Examiner Reader said:
Let's not forget that it's not just supermarket shoppers who rely upon plastic bags to get groceries home. Just last week, when I shopped at a gift shop, a toy store, a beer store, a couple restaurants, bought girl scout cookies and got my shirts from a dry cleaner, all delivered my goods in plastic. Will we also ban newspapers being wrapped in plastic, or make it a crime to send our kids' lunches in plastic bags? This bill is completely ridiculous. As another reader stated, let's enforce the laws we already have instead of wasting state time & resources enacting new ones. I happen to reuse the grocery bags in my home's trash cans around the house, so they serve a useful purpose. My teenager, who is into saving trees, will have a heart attack if suddenly I require 15 huge paper bags to get my groceries. (I guarantee nobody will ever have enough of the reusable ones.)

6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:18 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 30, 2008 re: "Recycling group: Oakland plastic bag ban hurts the environment"

Examiner Reader said:
When the handles fail in the supermarket paper bags or if the paper bags fail and you are carrying glass jars, bottles, and breakable items in them, send Ross Mikarimi the bill. His idea.

77 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:15 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 30, 2008 re: "Recycling group: Oakland plastic bag ban hurts the environment"

Seven said:
At the Safeway I shop in the Sunset (San Francisco), I haven't seen much of an increase in use of reuseable bags. The city ban on plastic bags has been pretty much just a swap of plastic bags for paper bags. However, the Sunset was the only district to vote against the plastic bag ban in the first place.

82 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:40 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Environmentalists’ input sought tonight to change recycling bill"

Bag Monster said:
I support politicians who resist pressure to set unreachable goals with unreasonable timetables on environmental issues. Additionally, I commend the mayor for encouraging people to use “recyclable materials” like plastic bags! Glad to know some people are being realistic about environmental issues even in the wake of uber-Liberal San Francisco’s bag ban. Plastic grocery bags are recyclable, so what’s with trying to ban plastic bags? It's hard being a Bag Monster!

127 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:29 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Plastic bag ban just part of S.F. green wave"

Jeff, an Independent said:
First it was paper bags killing trees, now it is plastic bags killing the environment? Has anybody ever heard of the term "recycling"?

135 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:33 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 27, 2007 re: "Annapolis’ proposed plastic bag ban sparks controversy"

Examiner Reader said:
Oh you've got to be kidding. Bery Scher of Giant likening banning plastic bags to banning cars. OK then, let's ban plastic bags and install speed limitation devices on cars (the way people drive in this state, it could only help). Even better is Safeway's Ten Eyk hiding behind the old "un-American" line...the ultimate in lame attempts to stop an argument! Look at the mounting litter and destruction humans' "freedom of choice" has brought to the environment! Quit being so ego-centric and grab a reuseable bag or two or three. Keep forgetting to bring them back to your car? Put them on the handle of your front door after you've unpacked them. This is something SO SIMPLE that will only have a positive impact for the environment and the animals that presently suffer because of human selfish laziness. I can't wait to see this ban enacted!

213 agree | 236 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:47 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 4, 2007 re: "Alderman seeks to ban bags"

Examiner Reader said:
Howzabout if you don't like plastic bags, don't take them. Don't force your bag preference on me. Improper disposal of bags is the problem, not the bags themselves. And littering is already a crime. Oh, that's right... we don't enforce laws in Maryland, only make new ones.

207 agree | 200 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:40 AM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Plastic bag ban just part of S.F. green wave"

starbrite said:
I think this is a fabulous idea, hooray for progress! However, opponents raise some very valid points. The primary problem is that, without plastic (or paper, either, I would suggest), just what ARE you going to bring your purchases home in? Some say use the reusable bags. Great idea, for those of us who have and use them. I keep some in my car for when I shop, as does my family, and I have a few friends who do as well. But there've been a number of times I left them at home or I was out with a friend and didn't have them, and the store didn't have any left. Many, many, many businesses don't carry reusable bags. On top of that, most people may just end up accumulating more and more of the reusables - and likely just throw them out. NOT a solution! Hopefully the ban will force people to change their habits - although if in 10 years only 1% of all plastic bags are recycled annually, my guess is that human nature - laziness - invariably will make or break the success of this effort.

256 agree | 199 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:23 AM MST on Sat., May. 12, 2007 re: "Plastic bag ban just part of S.F. green wave"

Mink said:
I think that we should ban plastic bags because they are not good for the enviroment. Also whenever you drive you see atleast one on the side of the road that one careless person through out their window. Animals could die from this and also it causes global warming.

268 agree | 263 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:15 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Plastic bag ban just part of S.F. green wave"

Examiner Reader said:
I'd like to see the plastic bag ban extended to everyone, not just large chains. I see more bags that say "thank you" on them floating around or in the streets than ones that say "Riteaid", "Walgreens", "Safeway" or "Albertsons". Everyone needs to take responsibility including small businesses. It will not kill people to get in the habit of carrying a reusable bag when they go shopping, or to not use a bag for something that will fit in their purse.

283 agree | 255 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:52 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Plastic bag ban just part of S.F. green wave"

Examiner Reader said:
this is a great article. rigefield should conserve more too!!!

276 agree | 279 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:03 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 11, 2007 re: "Plastic bag ban just part of S.F. green wave"

Examiner Reader said:
Hey Keeks this is for you, this is a cool article and may be a good idea to have everywhere.

272 agree | 272 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)